Tootfinder

How the US democracy is designed to avoid representation
Right now in the US, a system which proclaims to give each citizen representation, my interests are not represented very well by most of my so-called representatives at any level of government. This is true for a majority of Americans across the political spectrum, and it happens by design. The "founding fathers" were explicit about wanting a system of government that would appear Democratic but which would keep power in the hands of rich white landowners, and they successfully designed exactly that. But how does disenfranchisement work in this system?
First, a two-party system locked in by first-post-the-post winner-takes-all elections immediately destroys representation for everyone who didn't vote for the winner, including those who didn't vote or weren't eligible to vote. Single-day non-holiday elections and prisoner disenfranchisement go a long way towards ensuring working-class people get no say, but much larger is the winner-takes all system. In fact, even people who vote for the winning candidate don't get effective representation if they're really just voting against the opponent as the greater of two evils. In a 51/49 election with 50% turnout, you've immediately ensured that ~75% of eligible voters don't get represented, and with lesser-of-two-evils voting, you create an even wider gap to wedge corporate interests into. Politicians need money to saturate their lesser-of-two-evils message far more than they need to convince any individual voter to support their policies. It's even okay if they get caught lying, cheating, or worse (cough Epstein cough) as long as the other side is also doing those things and you can freeze out new parties.
Second, by design the Senate ensures uneven representation, allowing control of the least-populous half of states to control or at least shut down the legislative process. A rough count suggests 284.6 million live in the 25 most-populous states, while only 54.8 million live in the rest. Currently, counting states with divided representation as two half-states with half as much population, 157.8 million people are represented by 53 Republican sensors, while 180.5 million people get only 45 seats of Democratic representation. This isn't an anti-Democrat bias, it's a bias towards less-populous states, whose residents get more than their share it political power.
I haven't even talked about gerrymandering yet, or family/faith-based "party loyalty," etc. Overall, the effect is that the number of people whose elected representatives meaningfully represent their interests on any given issue is vanishingly small (like, 10% of people tops), unless you happen to be rich enough to purchase lobbying power or direct access.
If we look at polls, we can see how lack of representation lets congress & the president enact many policies that go against what a majority of the population wants. Things like abortion restrictions, the current ICE raids, and Medicare cuts are deeply unpopular, but they benefit the political class and those who can buy access. These are possible because the system ensures at every step of the way that ordinary people do NOT get the one thing the system promises them: representation in the halls of power.
Okay, but is this a feature of all democracies, inherent in the nature of a majority-decides system? Not exactly...
1/2
#uspol #democracy

Three of my photos when I walked through a small portion of the South March Highlands Conservation Forest. Part of the paths I walked were quite rugged, but worth it for the views and that no one was on them so I had a very quiet walk. Towards the end when I was on the easier paths I passed and was passed by bikers and fellow walkers.
My watch tracked what I walked and I covered approximately 10 Km over three hours going through some of the trails. That is a fraction of the trails, b…

P.J. Harvey es otra cumpleañera rockera del día. La britšnica, que comparte cumpleaños con Lennon, nació el 9 de octubre de 1969, hoy cumple 56 años.
#PJHarvey #CumpleañosRockero #Rock

VeriOS: Query-Driven Proactive Human-Agent-GUI Interaction for Trustworthy OS Agents
Zheng Wu, Heyuan Huang, Xingyu Lou, Xiangmou Qu, Pengzhou Cheng, Zongru Wu, Weiwen Liu, Weinan Zhang, Jun Wang, Zhaoxiang Wang, Zhuosheng Zhang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07553

VeriOS: Query-Driven Proactive Human-Agent-GUI Interaction for Trustworthy OS Agents
With the rapid progress of multimodal large language models, operating system (OS) agents become increasingly capable of automating tasks through on-device graphical user interfaces (GUIs). However, most existing OS agents are designed for idealized settings, whereas real-world environments often present untrustworthy conditions. To mitigate risks of over-execution in such scenarios, we propose a query-driven human-agent-GUI interaction framework that enables OS agents to decide when to query h…

K2-Think: A Parameter-Efficient Reasoning System
Zhoujun Cheng, Richard Fan, Shibo Hao, Taylor W. Killian, Haonan Li, Suqi Sun, Hector Ren, Alexander Moreno, Daqian Zhang, Tianjun Zhong, Yuxin Xiong, Yuanzhe Hu, Yutao Xie, Xudong Han, Yuqi Wang, Varad Pimpalkhute, Yonghao Zhuang, Aaryamonvikram Singh, Xuezhi Liang, Anze Xie, Jianshu She, Desai Fan, Chengqian Gao, Liqun Ma, Mikhail Yurochkin, John Maggs, Xuezhe Ma, Guowei He, Zhiting Hu, Zhengzhong Liu, Eric P. Xing

K2-Think: A Parameter-Efficient Reasoning System
K2-Think is a reasoning system that achieves state-of-the-art performance with a 32B parameter model, matching or surpassing much larger models like GPT-OSS 120B and DeepSeek v3.1. Built on the Qwen2.5 base model, our system shows that smaller models can compete at the highest levels by combining advanced post-training and test-time computation techniques. The approach is based on six key technical pillars: Long Chain-of-thought Supervised Finetuning, Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewa…

Ok NLziet ... Er zijn toch echt grenzen aan wat ik waardeer.. 😅😅😅
Zelfs nog nooit per ongeluk naar gekeken in al die jaren!

Zelensky heeft helemaal gelijk.
"De Oekraïense president Volodymyr Zelensky zit op dezelfde golflengte. Hij voegde er bij het Oekraïense nieuwsagentschap RBC-Ukraine aan toe dat de Russen het ook gedaan kunnen hebben om te voorkomen dat bondgenoten luchtafweersystemen aan Oekraïne zouden leverden vóór de winter.
„Om te laten zien: wij kunnen jullie ook aanvallen, jullie hebben die systemen zelf nodig. Dat ruikt enorm naar iets wat Poetin zou doen”, aldus Zelensky."

Nieuwe details over incident met Russische drones in Polen: ‘Vijf toestellen koersten op Navo-basis’
Er zijn nieuwe details opgedoken over het drone-incident boven Polen in de nacht van dinsdag op woensdag. Vijf van de twintig waargenomen toestellen zouden een directe vliegroute gehad hebben naar een Navo-basis. Dat meldt Die Welt. Volgens de Duitse krant stapelen de aanwijzingen voor ‘een gerichte operatie’ zich op.

Jeg har fulgt Norsk Syndikalistisk Forbund en stund, og det fŸles som å stå på skuldrene til en lang kamp for ekte arbeiderkontroll og selvorganisering. NSF bærer historien til radikale arbeidere som siden 1916 har stått imot byråkrati, hierarkier og enhver form for politisk slippe-opp. Deres anarkosyndikalistiske tradisjon bygger på solidaritet nedenfra og direkte aksjon, noe jeg virkelig verdsetter.
I dag kan de virke små og marginale i det politiske landskapet, men for meg er de for…

Ja też taki będę!
#Bleach #anime

Speculative politics
As an anarchist (okay, maybe not in practice), I'm tired of hearing why we have to suffer X and Y indignity to "preserve the rule of law" or "maintain Democratic norms." So here's an example of what representative democracy (a form of government that I believe is inherently flawed) could look like if its proponents had even an ounce of imagination, and/or weren't actively trying to rig it to favor a rich donor class:
1. Unicameral legislature, where representatives pass laws directly. Each state elects 3 statewide representatives: the three most-popular candidates in a statewide race where each person votes for one candidate (ranked preference voting would be even better but might not be necessary, and is not a solution by itself). Instead of each representative getting one vote in the chamber, they get N votes, where N is the number of people who voted for them. This means that in a close race, instead of the winner getting all the power, the power is split. Having 3 representatives trades off between leisure size and ensuring that two parties can't dominate together.
2. Any individual citizen can contact their local election office to switch or withdraw their vote at any time (maybe with a 3-day delay or something). Voting power of representatives can thus shift even without an election. They are limited to choosing one of the three elected representatives, or "none of the above." If the "none of the above" fraction exceeds 20% of eligible voters, a new election is triggered for that state. If turnout is less than 80%, a second election happens immediately, with results being final even at lower turnout until 6 months later (some better mechanism for turnout management might be needed).
3. All elections allow mail-in ballots, and in-person voting happens Sunday-Tuesday with the Monday being a mandatory holiday. (Yes, election integrity is not better in this system and that's a big weakness.)
4. Separate nationwide elections elect three positions for head-of-state: one with diplomatic/administrative powers, another with military powers, and a third with veto power. For each position, the top three candidates serve together, with only the first-place winner having actual power until vote switches or withdrawals change who that is. Once one of these heads loses their first-place status, they cannot get it again until another election, even if voters switch preferences back (to avoid dithering). An election for one of these positions is triggered when 20% have withdrawn their votes, or if all three people initially elected have been disqualified by losing their lead in the vote count.
5. Laws that involve spending money are packaged with specific taxes to pay for them, and may only be paid for by those specific revenues. Each tax may be opted into or out of by each taxpayer; where possible opting out of the tax also opts you out of the service. (I'm well aware of a lot of the drawbacks of this, but also feel like they'd not necessarily be worse than the drawbacks of our current system.) A small mandatory tax would cover election expenses.
6. I'm running out of attention, but similar multi-winner elections could elect panels of judges from which a subset is chosen randomly to preside in each case.
Now I'll point out once again that this system, in not directly confronting capitalism, racism, patriarchy, etc., is probably doomed to the same failures as our current system. But if you profess to want a "representative democracy" as opposed to something more libratory, I hope you'll at least advocate for something like this that actually includes meaningful representation as opposed to the current US system that's engineered to quash it.
Key questions: "Why should we have winner-take-all elections when winners-take-proportionately-to-votes is right there?" and "Why should elected officials get to ignore their constituents' approval except during elections, when vote-withdrawal or -switching is possible?"
2/2
#Democracy