Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@fanf@mendeddrum.org
2025-10-18 20:42:01

from my link log —
Why are video games graphics (still) a challenge? Productionizing rendering algorithms.
bartwronski.com/2020/12/27/why

@ayn@trunk.lol
2025-12-18 12:10:46

this is kinda a crazy deal now that the jpn yen is so low
lift-net.co.jp/products/object

@maxheadroom@hub.uckermark.social
2025-11-18 10:19:46

dehydrating the filament does make a difference for 3D printing. Much less stringing. I'm using my food dehydrator occasionally to dry filament that was sitting outside too long on the printer. ##3Dprint #3Dprinting

close up of a 3D printer head printing a while object on the printbed
A square shaped box in the heat bed of a 3D printer. The object is printed with white filament and seems to be some sort of housing. Several parts in the walls are left out for buttons and latches.
a round food dehydrator with a transparent lid. Under the lid a cardboard spool of 3D printer filament can be seen. the dryer is sitting on a desk that looks slightly messy with various cables and gadgets.
@ErikJonker@mastodon.social
2025-11-15 12:13:28

Great research and sloppy work by the Kremlin 😀
"Where's Putin? How The Kremlin Hides His Location With Three Nearly Identical Offices"
rferl.org/a/kremlin-trickery-p

@drbruced@aus.social
2025-11-19 19:41:15

I’m getting enough of these to think it must be the new Nigerian prince scam. Am I right? Anyone know how it works?

Email that reads “We have a family office that is highly interested in making an investment into Systems Approach's space. We are a capital advisory firm that works directly with a select group of family offices, and this particular family office is strongly considering an investment into Systems Approach's vertical, so we wanted to reach out and see if you are open to bringing on capital.

Are you available to discuss this opportunity?

Thanks,
@yaya@jorts.horse
2025-10-17 15:54:30
Content warning: shitlibs love taking pictures at "protests" that they RSVP'd to

every time I criticize these shitlib parades they say well it gets people used to mass mobilization. to which I say when you're teaching someone to drive do you start by teaching them to never wear a seat belt, not to check their mirrors, to drive with their phone in one hand, to merge without looking? or do you start by teaching people how to do things correctly so they don't learn bad dangerous habits
y'all hate opsec so muuuch

@fanf@mendeddrum.org
2025-11-18 18:42:03

from my link log —
DRAM errors and cosmic rays: space invaders or science fiction?
arxiv.org/abs/2407.16487
saved 2025-11-17 dotat.at/:…

@cowboys@darktundra.xyz
2025-10-17 13:21:29

Rinse, Repeat: Cowboys made questionable hire at DC, then made his job impossible cowboyswire.usatoday.com/story

@hex@kolektiva.social
2025-11-17 06:11:16

I think we can actually prove that this constraint is the *only* constraint that can preserve freedom:
1. There will exist actors in a system who will wish to take advantage of others. Evolution drives survival and one strategy for increasing survival in an altruistic society is to become a parasite.
2. Expecting exploitative dynamics, a system needs to have a set of rules to manage exploitation.
3. If the set of rules is static it will lack the requisite variety necessary to manage the infinite possible behavior of humans so the system will fail.
4. If the system is dynamic then it must have a rule set about how it's own rules are updated. This would make the system recursive, which makes the system at least as complex as mathematics. Any system at least as complex as mathematics is necessarily either incomplete or inconsistent (Gödel's incompleteness theorem). If the system is incomplete, then constraints can be evaded which then allow a malicious agent to seize control of the system and update the rules for their own benefit. If constraints are incomplete, then a malicious agent can take advantage of others within the system.
5. Therefore, no social system can possibly protect freedom unless there exists a single metasystemic constraint (that the system must be optional) allowing for the system to be abandoned when compromised.
Oh, you might say, but this just means you have to infinitely abandon systems. Sure, but there's an evolutionary advantage to cooperation so there's evolutionary pressure to *not* be a malicious actor. So a malicious actor being able to compromise the whole system is likely to be a much more rare event. Compromising a system is a lot of work, so the first thing a malicious actor would want to do is preserve that work. They would want to lock you in. The most important objective to a malicious actor compromising a system would be to violate that metasystemic constraint, or all of their work goes out the window when everyone leaves.
And now you understand why borders exist, why fascists are obsessed with maintaining categories like gender, race, ethnicity, etc. This is why even Democrats like Newsom are on board with putting houseless people in concentration camps. And this is why the most important thing anarchists promote is the ability to choose not to be part of any of that.

@fanf@mendeddrum.org
2025-10-17 14:42:01

from my link log —
The maturing of QUIC.
fastly.com/blog/maturing-of-qu
saved 2019-11-14 dotat.at/:/CW74X.htm…