Tootfinder

Es wundert mich schon sehr lange, dass Bundesregierung und Ministerien ob Bund oder Land sowie große dt. Unternehmen immer noch auf #X unterwegs sind.
Wer sich in schelchter bis krimineller Gesellschaft bewegt, darf sich nicht wundern, wenn man ihm selbst ein Mindestmaß an Anstand, Rationalität, Zivilcourage und Verstand in Abrede stellt.
Ist den Verantwortlichen eigentlich noch zu helfen? Wie du…

Kommentar: Nach Musks Aufruf zur Gewalt muss die Bundesregierung X verlassen
Elon Musk hat am Samstag als Sprecher einer Großdemonstration zu Gewalt aufgerufen. Doch die Bundesregierung und viele Medien sind weiterhin auf seiner Plattform X. Was muss eigentlich noch passieren, bis sie diesem gewaltbereiten Rechtsradikalen den Rücken kehren? Ein Kommentar.

💥We are pleased to share our new paper about ancient RNA expression profiles from the Woolly Mammoth, now published in Cell @cellpress.bsky.social
If you want to know more, read the thread below:
https://bsky.app/profile/marmole6.bsky.social/post/3m5m2u5u7gk2m

Emilio Mármol Sánchez (@marmole6.bsky.social)
During past years, research focused on ancient #DNA has gained a lot of interest, with dozens of papers being routinely published each year📃 But what about ancient #RNA? The common preconception is that these molecules, as opposed to DNA, do not last long after cell death. https://media.tenor.com/gMBUgkYXPxIAAAAC/ponke-ponkesol.gif?hh=498&ww=498

TL;DR: what if instead of denying the harms of fascism, we denied its suppressive threats of punishment
Many of us have really sharpened our denial skills since the advent of the ongoing pandemic (perhaps you even hesitated at the word "ongoing" there and thought "maybe I won't read this one, it seems like it'll be tiresome"). I don't say this as a preface to a fiery condemnation or a plea to "sanity" or a bunch of evidence of how bad things are, because I too have honed my denial skills in these recent years, and I feel like talking about that development.
Denial comes in many forms, including strategic information avoidance ("I don't have time to look that up right now", "I keep forgetting to look into that", "well this author made a tiny mistake, so I'll click away and read something else", "I'm so tired of hearing about this, let me scroll farther", etc.) strategic dismissal ("look, there's a bit of uncertainty here, I should ignore this", "this doesn't line up perfectly with my anecdotal experience, it must be completely wrong", etc.) and strategic forgetting ("I don't remember what that one study said exactly; it was painful to think about", "I forgot exactly what my friend was saying when we got into that argument", etc.). It's in fact a kind of skill that you can get better at, along with the complementary skill of compartmentalization. It can of course be incredibly harmful, and a huge genre of fables exists precisely to highlight its harms, but it also has some short-term psychological benefits, chiefly in the form of muting anxiety. This is not an endorsement of denial (the harms can be catastrophic), but I want to acknowledge that there *are* short-term benefits. Via compartmentalization, it's even possible to be honest with ourselves about some of our own denials without giving them up immediately.
But as I said earlier, I'm not here to talk you out of your denials. Instead, given that we are so good at denial now, I'm here to ask you to be strategic about it. In particular, we live in a world awash with propaganda/advertising that serves both political and commercial ends. Why not use some of our denial skills to counteract that?
For example, I know quite a few people in complete denial of our current political situation, but those who aren't (including myself) often express consternation about just how many people in the country are supporting literal fascism. Of course, logically that appearance of widespread support is going to be partly a lie, given how much our public media is beholden to the fascists or outright in their side. Finding better facts on the true level of support is hard, but in the meantime, why not be in denial about the "fact" that Trump has widespread popular support?
To give another example: advertisers constantly barrage us with messages about our bodies and weight, trying to keep us insecure (and thus in the mood to spend money to "fix" the problem). For sure cutting through that bullshit by reading about body positivity etc. is a better solution, but in the meantime, why not be in denial about there being anything wrong with your body?
This kind of intentional denial certainly has its own risks (our bodies do actually need regular maintenance, for example, so complete denial on that front is risky) but there's definitely a whole lot of misinformation out there that it would be better to ignore. To the extent such denial expands to a more general denial of underlying problems, this idea of intentional denial is probably just bad. But I sure wish that in a world where people (including myself) routinely deny significant widespread dangers like COVID-19's long-term risks or the ongoing harms of escalating fascism, they'd at least also deny some of the propaganda keeping them unhappy and passive. Instead of being in denial about US-run concentration camps, why not be in denial that the state will be able to punish you for resisting them?

Rational functions that share finite values with their first derivative
Andreas Sauer, Andreas Schweizer
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08517 https://arxiv.org…

Rational functions that share finite values with their first derivative
We treat shared value problems for rational functions $R(z)$ and their derivative $R'(z)$ in the plane and on the sphere. We also consider shared values for the pair $R(w)$ and $\partial_{z} R = λw \cdot R'(w)$ on ${\mathbb C} \setminus \{ 0 \}$ and $\widehat{\mathbb C}$, again with rational functions $R$. In ${\mathbb C} \setminus \{ 0 \}$ this is related to shared values of meromorphic functions $f : {\mathbb C} \to \widehat{\mathbb C}$ and $f'$ through $f(z)=R(w)$ with $w=\exp(λz)$, while …

Trevon Diggs could be next Cowboys' star out the door after trading Micah Parsons https://cowboyswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/cowboys/2025/08/29/cowboys-trevon-diggs-trade-possibility-rationa…

Grabbing the Forbidden Fruit: Restriction-Sensitive Choice
Niels Boissonnet, Alexis Ghersengorin
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.11673 https://arxiv.org/pdf/250…

Grabbing the Forbidden Fruit: Restriction-Sensitive Choice
Restricting individuals' access to some opportunities may steer their desire toward their substitutes, a phenomenon known as the forbidden fruit effect. We axiomatize a choice model named restriction-sensitive choice (RSC), which rationalizes the forbidden fruit effect and is compatible with the prominent psychological explanations: reactance theory and commodity theory. The model is identifiable from choice data, specifically from the observation of choice reversals caused by the removal of op…

Routinely ignoring Dependabot requests pays off again, probably.
https://cyberplace.social/@GossiTheDog/115169390397282254

Bridging the Gap in Ophthalmic AI: MM-Retinal-Reason Dataset and OphthaReason Model toward Dynamic Multimodal Reasoning
Ruiqi Wu, Yuang Yao, Tengfei Ma, Chenran Zhang, Na Su, Tao Zhou, Geng Chen, Wen Fan, Yi Zhou
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16129

Bridging the Gap in Ophthalmic AI: MM-Retinal-Reason Dataset and OphthaReason Model toward Dynamic Multimodal Reasoning
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently demonstrated remarkable reasoning abilities with reinforcement learning paradigm. Although several multimodal reasoning models have been explored in the medical domain, most of them focus exclusively on basic reasoning, which refers to shallow inference based on visual feature matching. However, real-world clinical diagnosis extends beyond basic reasoning, demanding reasoning processes that integrate heterogeneous clinical information (such…

Trade in Minutes! Rationality-Driven Agentic System for Quantitative Financial Trading
Zifan Song, Kaitao Song, Guosheng Hu, Ding Qi, Junyao Gao, Xiaohua Wang, Dongsheng Li, Cairong Zhao
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04787

Trade in Minutes! Rationality-Driven Agentic System for Quantitative Financial Trading
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) and agentic systems have shown exceptional decision-making capabilities, revealing significant potential for autonomic finance. Current financial trading agents predominantly simulate anthropomorphic roles that inadvertently introduce emotional biases and rely on peripheral information, while being constrained by the necessity for continuous inference during deployment. In this paper, we pioneer the harmonization of strategic depth in agents w…

There is no "national security" rationale
- not least one that arbitrarily toggles on & off
- for the tariffs.
Section 301 tariffs are supposed to follow a legal process based on identified violations of existing trade agreements.
All of this violates our WTO treaty obligations. It's all nonsense.