Tootfinder

Let's say you find a really cool forum online that has lots of good advice on it. It's even got a very active community that's happy to answer questions very quickly, and the community seems to have a wealth of knowledge about all sorts of subjects.
You end up visiting this community often, and trusting the advice you get to answer all sorts of everyday questions you might have, which before you might have found answers to using a web search (of course web search is now full of SEI spam and other crap so it's become nearly useless).
Then one day, you ask an innocuous question about medicine, and from this community you get the full homeopathy treatment as your answer. Like, somewhat believable on the face of it, includes lots of citations to reasonable-seeming articles, except that if you know even a tiny bit about chemistry and biology (which thankfully you do), you know that the homoeopathy answers are completely bogus and horribly dangerous (since they offer non-treatments for real diseases). Your opinion of this entire forum suddenly changes. "Oh my God, if they've been homeopathy believers all this time, what other myths have they fed me as facts?"
You stop using the forum for anything, and go back to slogging through SEI crap to answer your everyday questions, because one you realize that this forum is a community that's fundamentally untrustworthy, you realize that the value of getting advice from it on any subject is negative: you knew enough to spot the dangerous homeopathy answer, but you know there might be other such myths that you don't know enough to avoid, and any community willing to go all-in on one myth has shown itself to be capable of going all in on any number of other myths.
...
This has been a parable about large language models.
#AI #LLM

Here @…’s answer is IMO the correct answer:
When a corporation demands personal data, oblige with bad data. Ask an intrusive question, get an obfuscatory answer.
https://cyberplace.social/@GossiTheDog/114915518256108559

Daydream, which raised a $50M seed in June 2024 to build a generative AI shopping agent for fashion, launches in beta, with an app expected later this summer (Hilary Milnes/Vogue Business)
https://www.voguebusiness.com/story/techno

Is Daydream’s AI platform the answer to fashion’s discovery problem?
Founder Julie Bornstein raised $50 million last year to create the ultimate AI shopping experience. Today, it launches in beta.

Drei chinesische Gruppen als Angreifer auf Sharepoint-Server identifiziert
Eine Analyse von Microsoft nennt drei verschiedene Gruppen aus China als Angreifer auf die jüngste Sharepoint-Lücke. Dabei dürfte es aber nicht bleiben.

Senate Democrats demand answers on rural health fund (Alejandra O'Connell-Domenech/The Hill)
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5421354-senate-democrats-demand-answers-on-rural-health-fund/
http://www.memeorandum.com/250725/p123#a250725p123

Mittwoch: Autonomy-Schadenersatz für HP, Sharepoint-Angriffe aus China
Übernahmeschäden geringer als beklagt Microsoft nennt Sharepoint-Angreifer Sportmodell von Opels E-SUV IT-Fachkräfte für EU Apple gegen Spyware im Iran

Massie comes up with another way to anger President Trump (Gregory Svirnovskiy/Politico)
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/24/massie-comes-up-with-another-way-to-anger-president-trump-00422043
http://www.memeorandum.com/250624/p141#a250624p141

Kupfer-Glas-Migration: Verbraucherschützer fordern transparente Abschaltpläne
Kunden sollen frühzeitig über Pläne zu DSL-Abschaltung informiert und zu Umstellung auf Glasfaser angeregt werden, verlangen die Verbraucherzentralen.

Zero-Day: Bluetooth-Lücke macht Millionen Kopfhörer zu Abhörstationen
Der in beliebten Modellen großer Hersteller verbaute Bluetooth-Chipsatz ist angreifbar. Hacker konnten so Anrufe starten und Geräte abhören.

Gefahr in der Luft: 🎧🚨 Forscher haben eine kritische Sicherheitslücke aufgedeckt, die Millionen drahtlose Kopfhörer in potenzielle Abhörgeräte verwandeln könnte.
Zum Artikel: https://heise.de/-10457857?wt_mc=sm.red.ho.…