Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@benb@osintua.eu
2025-07-15 22:37:35

Fact Check: Video Does NOT Show Gazans Fleeing Palestine Arriving In Sweden -- It Shows A West Bank Soccer Team Touring Europe: benborges.xyz/2025/07/15/fact-

@fanf@mendeddrum.org
2025-06-15 17:42:03

from my link log —
Elementary functions NOT following the IEEE 754 floating-point standard.
hlsl.co.uk/blog/2020/1/29/ieee
saved 2025-02-11

@hex@kolektiva.social
2025-06-14 11:12:47

It seems like, again, just following the plain logic of the Constitution and Declaration of Independence (which, again, I do not subscribe to), that every law passed under Trump, every supreme court justice appointment by Trump, every supreme court ruling by Trump appointed justices, all the illegal firing, etc, must all, necessarily, be null and void.
And if not following from the insurrection act, or from the oath of office, then following from the Declaration of Independence itself. The logic here being that a constitution is a contract between the people and their government, which the later upholds in order to maintain its legal status. The violation of said laws by the government violates "consent of the governed" (which, again, I have issues with the concept entirely but we're just going to ignore that) and therefore nullifies the authority of that government, granting " the right of the people to alter or to abolish it."
That seems a lot like the hard reset some folks have been looking for. Given that existing flaws allowed this state to be reached, it would also be necessary for the true authority to correct those mistakes before assuming authority that derives from these principles.
Now, personally, I don't subscribe to any of this logic but it's interesting to explore, as an outsider, where the logic goes.

@relcfp@mastodon.social
2025-07-14 14:15:13

JOBS> H-Net Job Guide Weekly Report for H-Buddhism: 30 June - 7 July #acrel networks.h-net.org/group/annou

@saraislet@infosec.exchange
2025-07-15 09:32:48

LinkedIn tips:
1. You don't have to read the posts.
2. If you don't like a post from someone you follow, then stop following them. You can keep a connection without following them!
3. If you don't like a post from someone you don't follow, then mark it as not interested. Send the signal to inform both the recommendation algorithm, and the people who design the recommendation algorithm, what content you don't want to see.
Whatever other people are…

@berlinbuzzwords@floss.social
2025-06-16 06:00:06

Welcome to Berlin Buzzwords 2025! 
Be sure not to miss our keynote speaker, @…, who will be giving a talk on „Unpacking Digital Sovereignty: How to avoid fueling the nationalist rise," which commences at 9:35 am at stage Kesselhaus.
 
Learn more:

Berlin Buzzwords posters
@netzschleuder@social.skewed.de
2025-07-15 08:00:07

twitter_15m: Twitter 15-M movement (2011)
A network representing follower-following relations among Twitter users associated with the 15-M Movement or Anti-austerity movement in Spain, in the period April-May 2011. Metadata include hashtags in the tweets.
This network has 87569 nodes and 6030459 edges.
Tags: Social, Online, Unweighted, Metadata

twitter_15m: Twitter 15-M movement (2011). 87569 nodes, 6030459 edges. https://networks.skewed.de/net/twitter_15m
@migueldeicaza@mastodon.social
2025-06-14 22:32:43

A small aside, during my vacation I finally started on writing a Metal backend for SwiftTerm.
It has a few missing features, so not worth comparing performance yet, but it is feeling great:
github.com/migueldeicaza/Swift

@fanf@mendeddrum.org
2025-07-14 08:42:04

from my link log —
Rain of Fire Falling: The crash of American Airlines flight 191.
admiralcloudberg.medium.com/ra

@hex@kolektiva.social
2025-06-14 11:01:02

Now personally, I'm not invested in the law and I reject the logical underpinnings of the whole thing. The US is founded on land that already had people on it, that already had multiple systems of authority, so there can be no claim that it has any legal authority to exist at all.
But it's hard to ignore the inconsistency here. Accepting the logic from the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, there is no way in which the current state can be legitimate and which Trump has the authority to do anything. The last legal president, again, following the logic that assumes such a thing even possible, was Barak Obama. Since the transfer of power, the country has failed to enforce the law.
If the executive cannot complete their oath, then they are considered vacant under the 25th amendment. If the cabinet fails to invoke article 4, then they too are involved in the insurrection (again, simply following the logic outlined pretty clearly here) as are any who would fail to support the invocation.
Since a full takeover of the federal government by insurrectionists wasn't really planned for, I'm guessing that it would necessarily go to the states, being the only remaining legal authority.