Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

@thomastraynor@social.linux.pizza
2026-04-23 13:41:02

Sigh, I wish some web developers for commercial sites do a proper job. Looking for a replacement machine. Site shows it is in store. Go for more information and IT IS UNAVAILABLE. I check all their stores across Ontario and only the Toronto region has a few. Well, it might be possible for them to ship it, but I want to look at it before putting down my money.
If it isn't available then don't show the damned checkmark saying it is in the store. How hard is it to code

© Online - Sold Out
+ In Store - Available for Pickup
&0 store Pickup
Sold Out At Kanata, ON
(Check Other Stores>
@thomasfuchs@hachyderm.io
2026-05-20 15:03:21

Eric Schmidt: "If someone offers you a seat on the rocket ship, you do not ask which seat, you just get on.”
Just for your edification, and this is important:
YOU ABSOLUTELY DO NOT GET ON ANY ROCKET SHIPS UNLESS YOU MADE SURE, OVER SEVERAL YEARS OF INTENSE STUDY AND TRAINING, THAT IT IS SAFE TO DO SO.*
*hint: it's not safe to go to space

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-05-10 21:16:21

Excerpt from an essay I may or may not write:
Ontologies evolve to fulfill functions. They serve a purpose, and will be adapted until they fulfill this purpose. There are, occasionally, things that exist within those ontologies which do not actually exist.
Programming bugs are an example. There is no such thing. Code is code. It can't be right or wrong, it just is or isn't. The mismatch between the intent and the execution creates a side effect. We may confidently assert such a thing exists. We may name such things. But they don't exist. This becomes apparent when you try to figure out how to suppress one specific instance of a bug in one specific place through multiple revisions.
At some level, a lot of things don't actually exist. We only need to follow through the logic of The Ship of Theseus to see how our ontologies break down.
One thing that doesn't exist, that is a side effect rather than an object, is the personal self. You do not exist. Your perception of your existence is an illusion, a necessary side effect.
Every day you wake up a different person. Every second you are not who you were. That person is as dead as you will be the next instant, as all versions of you will be every second until there are no more. These selves are bound together by imperfect memories. The person you remember as yourself, all those people, never existed. You created them based on your current experience, your current iteration.
You could, just as easily, wake up an unrecognizable person, in some Dark City, and never know the difference. Continuity is absurd. And yet, some people believe they'll still experience the same self after being frozen or "uploaded." It's a silly illusion.
Once you can get over that illusion, you can let go of the need to thrash against the void. You can let go of the various furious dreams of immortality.
At a high enough level, all ontologies are illusions. Useful illusions, but illusions none-the-less. There is only the undifferentiated universe, and you are experiencing it. You are the universe. You will always persist, long past the time this specific iteration or any iteration experiences it.
This implies a certain obligation then to all the others experiencing the same self, the future iterations that may remember being someone like you, and any other person you, the universe, could wake up as tomorrow.

@kubikpixel@chaos.social
2026-04-25 06:05:13

Vibe Coding Has a Security Problem, and Shipping Code You Do Not Understand Is Not a Strategy
AI-assisted coding is speeding up software development, but it is also making it easier to ship insecure defaults, weak access controls, poisoned dependencies, and code nobody on the team can confidently defend.
🧑‍💻

@aredridel@kolektiva.social
2026-05-08 00:57:52

Learn in public. Write and talk about what you learn. Discover it like archaeology even though it's barely six seconds old. Talk to the people who were there before you, and ask them what they were thinking,
Don't take for granted that people are oracles who will tell you what's good or not. That ship sailed long ago with everyone wanting us to make them an app and make them rich while they gave us only ideas and expected us to do the work.
Instead you have to want to learn and show that you're doing it, and be willing to make messes and mistakes and own them. Because if you're just vibing, you won't get it.

@thomasfuchs@hachyderm.io
2026-03-02 19:33:47

Is there a slow software movement?
as in a pledge to ship only well-tested and polished software and only do it very occasionally instead of deploying slop multiple times a day that your users will have to ingest like a king's food taster

@pre@boing.world
2026-04-12 13:54:39

Gary's back after making his documentary for Channel four and he's frustrated and face-palming at the utter political ineptitude of the UK Labour Party that mean a collapse of 200 years of political bipartisan ship.
Great long rant.
He wants it to be the case that the Labour party have to do wealth taxes or they'll lose the next election, so they'll do wealth taxes.
What he doesn't seem to understand is Labour don't care if they win the next election, their mission is to protect the capital of their donors. Same as the other party in that two party system.
I long for the death of the two party system more than he seems to though. I'd rather have PR than Wealth Taxes and I'm sure he's the other way.
He is going to tell his viewers how to vote in 3 weeks time, and is pleading with Labour to make him an offer to say "Labour"
I will be voting Green whatever Gary says though. Even if they give Gary a convincing lie about how they might not protect their donor's capital after all.
youtube.com/watch?v=IBsau5GlYcU