
2025-08-12 11:36:53
Grasp-HGN: Grasping the Unexpected
Mehrshad Zandigohar, Mallesham Dasari, Gunar Schirner
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07648 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.07648
Grasp-HGN: Grasping the Unexpected
Mehrshad Zandigohar, Mallesham Dasari, Gunar Schirner
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07648 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.07648
Improving Continuous Grasp Force Decoding from EEG with Time-Frequency Regressors and Premotor-Parietal Network Integration
Parth G. Dangi, Yogesh Kumar Meena
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07677
The judicial cases in OKC are closely linked to the silence and lack of accountability of Tibetan Buddhist Heads of Nyigmapa Lineages in 🇫🇷🇧🇪🇵🇹. To grasp the full extent of responsibility and complacency, check out this documentary. #TibetanBuddhism #Responsibility
Attribute-based Object Grounding and Robot Grasp Detection with Spatial Reasoning
Houjian Yu, Zheming Zhou, Min Sun, Omid Ghasemalizadeh, Yuyin Sun, Cheng-Hao Kuo, Arnie Sen, Changhyun Choi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08126
Grasp Like Humans: Learning Generalizable Multi-Fingered Grasping from Human Proprioceptive Sensorimotor Integration
Ce Guo, Xieyuanli Chen, Zhiwen Zeng, Zirui Guo, Yihong Li, Haoran Xiao, Dewen Hu, Huimin Lu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08354
DexVLG: Dexterous Vision-Language-Grasp Model at Scale
Jiawei He, Danshi Li, Xinqiang Yu, Zekun Qi, Wenyao Zhang, Jiayi Chen, Zhaoxiang Zhang, Zhizheng Zhang, Li Yi, He Wang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.02747
Addressing the Heterogeneity of Visualization in an Introductory PhD Course in the Swedish Context
Kostiantyn Kucher, Niklas R\"onnberg, Jonas L\"owgren
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08958
Have a beautiful Day of Aphrodite aka Venus' Day aka Frigg's Day aka Friday 🌹
"The Kyprian Queen [Aphrodite] brooded above their souls, that olden love might be renewed, and heart-ache chased away."
Quintus Smyrnaeus, Fall of Troy 14.160
🏛 Aphrodite Anadyomene, 1-2nd century CE, Musée Royal de Mariemont
@…
When you're so used to programming languages with high-level methods of checking for empty strings, that you grasp for something like `not x`, `x.empty()`, `len(x) == 0`… and only after a while of thinking, you realize that it's `x == ''`.
#Meson
Grasp-MPC: Closed-Loop Visual Grasping via Value-Guided Model Predictive Control
Jun Yamada, Adithyavairavan Murali, Ajay Mandlekar, Clemens Eppner, Ingmar Posner, Balakumar Sundaralingam
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06201
Towards Affordance-Aware Robotic Dexterous Grasping with Human-like Priors
Haoyu Zhao, Linghao Zhuang, Xingyue Zhao, Cheng Zeng, Haoran Xu, Yuming Jiang, Jun Cen, Kexiang Wang, Jiayan Guo, Siteng Huang, Xin Li, Deli Zhao, Hua Zou
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08896
A LLM-Driven Multi-Agent Systems for Professional Development of Mathematics Teachers
Kaiqi Yang, Hang Li, Yucheng Chu, Ahreum Han, Yasemin Copur-Gencturk, Jiliang Tang, Hui Liu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05292
This #wasp is cutting cat food into smaller pieces and flies away with them!😡
Replaced article(s) found for cs.HC. https://arxiv.org/list/cs.HC/new
[1/1]:
- GraspR: A Computational Model of Spatial User Preferences for Adaptive Grasp UI Design
Arthur Caetano, Yunhao Luo, Adwait Sharma, Misha Sra
"More than 10,000 species on brink of extinction need urgent action: Study"
#Animals #Extinction
Replaced article(s) found for cs.AI. https://arxiv.org/list/cs.AI/new
[2/4]:
- FFHFlow: Diverse and Uncertainty-Aware Dexterous Grasp Generation via Flow Variational Inference
Qian Feng, Jianxiang Feng, Zhaopeng Chen, Rudolph Triebel, Alois Knoll
GRASP: Grouped Regression with Adaptive Shrinkage Priors
Shu Yu Tew, Daniel F. Schmidt, Mario Boley
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.18092 https://
Communication-Efficient Module-Wise Federated Learning for Grasp Pose Detection in Cluttered Environments
Woonsang Kang, Joohyung Lee, Seungjun Kim, Jungchan Cho, Yoonseon Oh
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05861
"To grasp the full significance of life is the actor’s duty, to interpret it is his problem, and to express it his dedication."
-Marlon Brando
#acting #coaching #inspiration …
How to tell a vibe coder of lying when they say they check their code.
People who will admit to using LLMs to write code will usually claim that they "carefully check" the output since we all know that LLM code has a lot of errors in it. This is insufficient to address several problems that LLMs cause, including labor issues, digital commons stress/pollution, license violation, and environmental issues, but at least it's they are checking their code carefully we shouldn't assume that it's any worse quality-wise than human-authored code, right?
Well, from principles alone we can expect it to be worse, since checking code the AI wrote is a much more boring task than writing code yourself, so anyone who has ever studied human-computer interaction even a little bit can predict people will quickly slack off, stating to trust the AI way too much, because it's less work. I'm a different domain, the journalist who published an entire "summer reading list" full of nonexistent titles is a great example of this. I'm sure he also intended to carefully check the AI output, but then got lazy. Clearly he did not have a good grasp of the likely failure modes of the tool he was using.
But for vibe coders, there's one easy tell we can look for, at least in some cases: coding in Python without type hints. To be clear, this doesn't apply to novice coders, who might not be aware that type hints are an option. But any serious Python software engineer, whether they used type hints before or not, would know that they're an option. And if you know they're an option, you also know they're an excellent tool for catching code defects, with a very low effort:reward ratio, especially if we assume an LLM generates them. Of the cases where adding types requires any thought at all, 95% of them offer chances to improve your code design and make it more robust. Knowing about but not using type hints in Python is a great sign that you don't care very much about code quality. That's totally fine in many cases: I've got a few demos or jam games in Python with no type hints, and it's okay that they're buggy. I was never going to debug them to a polished level anyways. But if we're talking about a vibe coder who claims that they're taking extra care to check for the (frequent) LLM-induced errors, that's not the situation.
Note that this shouldn't be read as an endorsement of vibe coding for demos or other rough-is-acceptable code: the other ethical issues I skipped past at the start still make it unethical to use in all but a few cases (for example, I have my students use it for a single assignment so they can see for themselves how it's not all it's cracked up to be, and even then they have an option to observe a pre-recorded prompt session instead).
I once again confused a US Customs bridge troll by knowing the declaration form off from memory and clearly having a better grasp on USCBP ag biosecurity requirements than he did. I detest bureaucracy, but as a necessity of my former career, I'm very goddamn fucking good at it.
Donald Trump, I believe, wants to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell in exchange for her silence.
Note I said wants to. He might not.
A pardon would rip his base in two.
He may grasp that and not do it. -- But there can be little question that he’s thinking about it.
In fact, on the White House lawn Friday morning, he was asked about a possible Maxwell pardon, and he said:
“I’m allowed to do it.”
Task-Oriented Human Grasp Synthesis via Context- and Task-Aware Diffusers
An-Lun Liu, Yu-Wei Chao, Yi-Ting Chen
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11287 https://…
On $\tau$ Spin Use with KKMCee
J. M. John, Ananya Tapadar, Zbigniew Was
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04400 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.04400
First Plan Then Evaluate: Use a Vectorized Motion Planner for Grasping
Martin Matak, Mohanraj Devendran Ashanti, Karl Van Wyk, Tucker Hermans
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07162 ht…
Biggest Jump From College to the NFL For Raiders' Rookie https://www.si.com/nfl/raiders/las-vegas-charles-grant-pete-carroll-maxx-crosby-training-camp
Identifying Fine-grained Forms of Populism in Political Discourse: A Case Study on Donald Trump's Presidential Campaigns
Ilias Chalkidis, Stephanie Brandl, Paris Aslanidis
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.19303
A bibliometric analysis on the current situation and hot trends of the impact of microplastics on soil based on CiteSpace
Yiran Zheng, Yue Quan, Su Yan, Xinting Lv, Yuguanmin Cao, Minjie Fu, Mingji Jin
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.01520
Classifying Emergence in Robot Swarms: An Observer-Dependent Approach
Ricardo Vega, Cameron Nowzari
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07315 https://
GraSP: A Unified Graph-Based Framework for Scalable Generation, Quality Tagging, and Management of Synthetic Data for SFT and DPO
Bidyapati Pradhan, Surajit Dasgupta, Amit Kumar Saha, Omkar Anustoop, Sriram Puttagunta, Vipul Mittal, Gopal Sarda
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15432
The judicial cases in OKC are closely linked to the silence and accountability of Tibetan Buddhist Heads of Nyigmapa Lineages in 🇫🇷🇧🇪🇵🇹. To grasp the full extent of responsibility and complacency, let's delve deeper into the matter. #TibetanBuddhism #Responsibility
1/2
Should we teach vibe coding? Here's why not.
Should AI coding be taught in undergrad CS education?
1/2
I teach undergraduate computer science labs, including for intro and more-advanced core courses. I don't publish (non-negligible) scholarly work in the area, but I've got years of craft expertise in course design, and I do follow the academic literature to some degree. In other words, In not the world's leading expert, but I have spent a lot of time thinking about course design, and consider myself competent at it, with plenty of direct experience in what knowledge & skills I can expect from students as they move through the curriculum.
I'm also strongly against most uses of what's called "AI" these days (specifically, generative deep neutral networks as supplied by our current cadre of techbro). There are a surprising number of completely orthogonal reasons to oppose the use of these systems, and a very limited number of reasonable exceptions (overcoming accessibility barriers is an example). On the grounds of environmental and digital-commons-pollution costs alone, using specifically the largest/newest models is unethical in most cases.
But as any good teacher should, I constantly question these evaluations, because I worry about the impact on my students should I eschew teaching relevant tech for bad reasons (and even for his reasons). I also want to make my reasoning clear to students, who should absolutely question me on this. That inspired me to ask a simple question: ignoring for one moment the ethical objections (which we shouldn't, of course; they're very stark), at what level in the CS major could I expect to teach a course about programming with AI assistance, and expect students to succeed at a more technically demanding final project than a course at the same level where students were banned from using AI? In other words, at what level would I expect students to actually benefit from AI coding "assistance?"
To be clear, I'm assuming that students aren't using AI in other aspects of coursework: the topic of using AI to "help you study" is a separate one (TL;DR it's gross value is not negative, but it's mostly not worth the harm to your metacognitive abilities, which AI-induced changes to the digital commons are making more important than ever).
So what's my answer to this question?
If I'm being incredibly optimistic, senior year. Slightly less optimistic, second year of a masters program. Realistic? Maybe never.
The interesting bit for you-the-reader is: why is this my answer? (Especially given that students would probably self-report significant gains at lower levels.) To start with, [this paper where experienced developers thought that AI assistance sped up their work on real tasks when in fact it slowed it down] (https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09089) is informative. There are a lot of differences in task between experienced devs solving real bugs and students working on a class project, but it's important to understand that we shouldn't have a baseline expectation that AI coding "assistants" will speed things up in the best of circumstances, and we shouldn't trust self-reports of productivity (or the AI hype machine in general).
Now we might imagine that coding assistants will be better at helping with a student project than at helping with fixing bugs in open-source software, since it's a much easier task. For many programming assignments that have a fixed answer, we know that many AI assistants can just spit out a solution based on prompting them with the problem description (there's another elephant in the room here to do with learning outcomes regardless of project success, but we'll ignore this over too, my focus here is on project complexity reach, not learning outcomes). My question is about more open-ended projects, not assignments with an expected answer. Here's a second study (by one of my colleagues) about novices using AI assistance for programming tasks. It showcases how difficult it is to use AI tools well, and some of these stumbling blocks that novices in particular face.
But what about intermediate students? Might there be some level where the AI is helpful because the task is still relatively simple and the students are good enough to handle it? The problem with this is that as task complexity increases, so does the likelihood of the AI generating (or copying) code that uses more complex constructs which a student doesn't understand. Let's say I have second year students writing interactive websites with JavaScript. Without a lot of care that those students don't know how to deploy, the AI is likely to suggest code that depends on several different frameworks, from React to JQuery, without actually setting up or including those frameworks, and of course three students would be way out of their depth trying to do that. This is a general problem: each programming class carefully limits the specific code frameworks and constructs it expects students to know based on the material it covers. There is no feasible way to limit an AI assistant to a fixed set of constructs or frameworks, using current designs. There are alternate designs where this would be possible (like AI search through adaptation from a controlled library of snippets) but those would be entirely different tools.
So what happens on a sizeable class project where the AI has dropped in buggy code, especially if it uses code constructs the students don't understand? Best case, they understand that they don't understand and re-prompt, or ask for help from an instructor or TA quickly who helps them get rid of the stuff they don't understand and re-prompt or manually add stuff they do. Average case: they waste several hours and/or sweep the bugs partly under the rug, resulting in a project with significant defects. Students in their second and even third years of a CS major still have a lot to learn about debugging, and usually have significant gaps in their knowledge of even their most comfortable programming language. I do think regardless of AI we as teachers need to get better at teaching debugging skills, but the knowledge gaps are inevitable because there's just too much to know. In Python, for example, the LLM is going to spit out yields, async functions, try/finally, maybe even something like a while/else, or with recent training data, the walrus operator. I can't expect even a fraction of 3rd year students who have worked with Python since their first year to know about all these things, and based on how students approach projects where they have studied all the relevant constructs but have forgotten some, I'm not optimistic seeing these things will magically become learning opportunities. Student projects are better off working with a limited subset of full programming languages that the students have actually learned, and using AI coding assistants as currently designed makes this impossible. Beyond that, even when the "assistant" just introduces bugs using syntax the students understand, even through their 4th year many students struggle to understand the operation of moderately complex code they've written themselves, let alone written by someone else. Having access to an AI that will confidently offer incorrect explanations for bugs will make this worse.
To be sure a small minority of students will be able to overcome these problems, but that minority is the group that has a good grasp of the fundamentals and has broadened their knowledge through self-study, which earlier AI-reliant classes would make less likely to happen. In any case, I care about the average student, since we already have plenty of stuff about our institutions that makes life easier for a favored few while being worse for the average student (note that our construction of that favored few as the "good" students is a large part of this problem).
To summarize: because AI assistants introduce excess code complexity and difficult-to-debug bugs, they'll slow down rather than speed up project progress for the average student on moderately complex projects. On a fixed deadline, they'll result in worse projects, or necessitate less ambitious project scoping to ensure adequate completion, and I expect this remains broadly true through 4-6 years of study in most programs (don't take this as an endorsement of AI "assistants" for masters students; we've ignored a lot of other problems along the way).
There's a related problem: solving open-ended project assignments well ultimately depends on deeply understanding the problem, and AI "assistants" allow students to put a lot of code in their file without spending much time thinking about the problem or building an understanding of it. This is awful for learning outcomes, but also bad for project success. Getting students to see the value of thinking deeply about a problem is a thorny pedagogical puzzle at the best of times, and allowing the use of AI "assistants" makes the problem much much worse. This is another area I hope to see (or even drive) pedagogical improvement in, for what it's worth.
1/2
GRASPing Anatomy to Improve Pathology Segmentation
Keyi Li, Alexander Jaus, Jens Kleesiek, Rainer Stiefelhagen
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03374 https://arx…
An Implementation of a Visual Stepper in the GRASP Programming System
Panicz Maciej Godek
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.04859 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.04859…
Affordance-Guided Dual-Armed Disassembly Teleoperation for Mating Parts
Gen Sako, Takuya Kiyokawa, Kensuke Harada, Tomoki Ishikura, Naoya Miyaji, Genichiro Matsuda
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.05937
"The paper is only interested in the use of the idea, not the idea itself. Hardly anyone can understand the importance of an idea, it is so remarkable. Except that, possibly, some children catch on. And when a child catches on to an idea like that, we have a scientist." ("The value of science, Richard P. Feynman)
Short, but it took me all day to read it because I had to stop and think all the time, and it will take a lot longer to actually grasp it.
So last night, after watching the Russian Victory Day ‘24 video for contrast, I thought “what the hell” & went ahead & watched1️⃣ the PBS YT video of the “June 24 Military2️⃣ Parade” to see if it was as bad as all that
(Short Answer: Yes and No)
But this guy was the one that caught my sympathy as “you poor dude”.
Project-Based Learning in Introductory Quantum Computing Courses: A Case Study on Quantum Algorithms for Medical Imaging
Nischal Binod Gautam, Keith Evan Schubert, Enrique P. Blair
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.21321
Strengthening Programming Comprehension in Large Language Models through Code Generation
Xiaoning Ren, Qiang Hu, Wei Ma, Yan Li, Yao Zhang, Lingxiao Jiang, Yinxing Xue
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.12620 …
SPGrasp: Spatiotemporal Prompt-driven Grasp Synthesis in Dynamic Scenes
Yunpeng Mei, Hongjie Cao, Yinqiu Xia, Wei Xiao, Zhaohan Feng, Gang Wang, Jie Chen
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.20547
Crosslisted article(s) found for cs.MM. https://arxiv.org/list/cs.MM/new
[1/1]:
- Predicting User Grasp Intentions in Virtual Reality
Linghao Zeng
https://…
The judicial cases in OKC are closely linked to the silence and lack of accountability of Tibetan Buddhist Heads of Nyigmapa Lineages in 🇫🇷🇧🇪🇵🇹. To grasp the full extent of responsibility and complacency, check out this documentary. #TibetanBuddhism #Responsibility
\'Etale algebras and the Kummer theory of finite Galois modules
Evan M. O'Dorney
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11310 https://arx…
Predicting User Grasp Intentions in Virtual Reality
Linghao Zeng
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16582 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.16582
Manip4Care: Robotic Manipulation of Human Limbs for Solving Assistive Tasks
Yubin Koh, Ahmed H. Qureshi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02649 https://arxiv.org/…
FineGrasp: Towards Robust Grasping for Delicate Objects
Yun Du, Mengao Zhao, Tianwei Lin, Yiwei Jin, Chaodong Huang, Zhizhong Su
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05978
Querying Large Automotive Software Models: Agentic vs. Direct LLM Approaches
Lukasz Mazur, Nenad Petrovic, James Pontes Miranda, Ansgar Radermacher, Robert Rasche, Alois Knoll
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13171
Interpretable Decision-Making for End-to-End Autonomous Driving
Mona Mirzaie, Bodo Rosenhahn
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18898 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.18…
KGN-Pro: Keypoint-Based Grasp Prediction through Probabilistic 2D-3D Correspondence Learning
Bingran Chen, Baorun Li, Jian Yang, Yong Liu, Guangyao Zhai
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14820
The judicial cases in OKC are closely linked to the silence and accountability of Tibetan Buddhist Heads of Nyigmapa Lineages in 🇫🇷🇧🇪🇵🇹. To grasp the full extent of responsibility and complacency, let's delve deeper into the matter. #TibetanBuddhism #Responsibility
1/2
GraspMAS: Zero-Shot Language-driven Grasp Detection with Multi-Agent System
Quang Nguyen, Tri Le, Huy Nguyen, Thieu Vo, Tung D. Ta, Baoru Huang, Minh N. Vu, Anh Nguyen
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.18448
Crosslisted article(s) found for cs.AI. https://arxiv.org/list/cs.AI/new
[1/9]:
- QuickGrasp: Lightweight Antipodal Grasp Planning with Point Clouds
Navin Sriram Ravie, Keerthi Vasan M, Asokan Thondiyath, Bijo Sebastian
Assessing students understanding of the concept of electric potential difference based on the SOLO taxonomy in upper-secondary students for a targeted assessment
Rahmani Fateme, Ahmadi Kalateh Fatemeh
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13723
The judicial cases in OKC are closely linked to the silence and lack of accountability of Tibetan Buddhist Heads of Nyigmapa Lineages in 🇫🇷🇧🇪🇵🇹. To grasp the full extent of responsibility and complacency, check out this documentary. #TibetanBuddhism #Responsibility
Investigating Sensors and Methods in Grasp State Classification in Agricultural Manipulation
Benjamin Walt, Jordan Westphal, Girish Krishnan
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11588 htt…
KnotDLO: Toward Interpretable Knot Tying
Holly Dinkel, Raghavendra Navaratna, Jingyi Xiang, Brian Coltin, Trey Smith, Timothy Bretl
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22176
Leveraging Extrinsic Dexterity for Occluded Grasping on Grasp Constraining Walls
Keita Kobashi, Masayoshi Tomizuka
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14721 https:/…
CDP: Towards Robust Autoregressive Visuomotor Policy Learning via Causal Diffusion
Jiahua Ma, Yiran Qin, Yixiong Li, Xuanqi Liao, Yulan Guo, Ruimao Zhang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14769
Effects of variation in system responsiveness on user performance in virtual environments
Benjamin Watson, Neff Walker, William Ribarsky, Victoria Spaulding
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.18085
GraspQP: Differentiable Optimization of Force Closure for Diverse and Robust Dexterous Grasping
Ren\'e Zurbr\"ugg, Andrei Cramariuc, Marco Hutter
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15002
OVGrasp: Open-Vocabulary Grasping Assistance via Multimodal Intent Detection
Chen Hu, Shan Luo, Letizia Gionfrida
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04324 https://…
Reactive In-Air Clothing Manipulation with Confidence-Aware Dense Correspondence and Visuotactile Affordance
Neha Sunil, Megha Tippur, Arnau Saumell, Edward Adelson, Alberto Rodriguez
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.03889
GraspGen: A Diffusion-based Framework for 6-DOF Grasping with On-Generator Training
Adithyavairavan Murali, Balakumar Sundaralingam, Yu-Wei Chao, Wentao Yuan, Jun Yamada, Mark Carlson, Fabio Ramos, Stan Birchfield, Dieter Fox, Clemens Eppner
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13097
Equivariant Volumetric Grasping
Pinhao Song, Yutong Hu, Pengteng Li, Renaud Detry
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.18847 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.18847
A segmented robot grasping perception neural network for edge AI
Casper Br\"ocheler, Thomas Vroom, Derrick Timmermans, Alan van den Akker, Guangzhi Tang, Charalampos S. Kouzinopoulos, Rico M\"ockel
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13970
ClutterDexGrasp: A Sim-to-Real System for General Dexterous Grasping in Cluttered Scenes
Zeyuan Chen, Qiyang Yan, Yuanpei Chen, Tianhao Wu, Jiyao Zhang, Zihan Ding, Jinzhou Li, Yaodong Yang, Hao Dong
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14317
A Point Cloud Completion Approach for the Grasping of Partially Occluded Objects and Its Applications in Robotic Strawberry Harvesting
Ali Abouzeid, Malak Mansour, Chengsong Hu, Dezhen Song
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14066
Versatile and Generalizable Manipulation via Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning with Grounded Object Detection
Huiyi Wang, Fahim Shahriar, Alireza Azimi, Gautham Vasan, Rupam Mahmood, Colin Bellinger
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10814
Regrasp Maps for Sequential Manipulation Planning
Svetlana Levit, Marc Toussaint
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12407 https://arxiv.org/p…