Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@erikdelareguera@mastodon.nu
2025-12-20 17:31:39

Som mångårig medlem i både SJF och Sveriges Författarförbund ser jag fram mot riklig ersättning efter den rättsprocess/förlikning som bör följa på den stämningsansökan mot KB som jag utgår från snart kommer att lämnas in. journalisten.se/ledare/ai-bola

@erikdelareguera@mastodon.nu
2026-01-24 13:12:02

Macron a des raisons bien précises de s’inquiéter de la “menace Trump”.
Voici mon analyse, traduite et publiée par Courrier International. 🌎 #geopolitique #Trump

@Dragofix@veganism.social
2026-02-23 23:33:35

Greenland ice melt surges unprecedentedly amid warming #Greenland

@vosje62@mastodon.nl
2025-12-17 19:08:05

Oja .... Vanavond mestdebat.
Is al even bezig...
#nlpol #mestdebat #debat

@memeorandum@universeodon.com
2025-12-04 22:50:57

Apocalypse Not: Science Journal 'Nature' Retracts Catastrophic Climate Change Study (Jameson Mitrovich/The Washington Free Beacon)
freebeacon.com/latest-news/apo
memeorandum.com/251204/p106#a2

@mela@zusammenkunft.net
2025-12-02 16:14:54

Schweigespirale in 3, 2, 1 ...
spiegel.de/ausland/usa-donald-

@digitalnaiv@mastodon.social
2026-01-11 19:11:04

"Es! War! Keine! Notwehr!“ – René Martens erinnert Journalisten an etwas Altmodisches: Fakten. Wer Lügen gleichberechtigt neben belegte Wirklichkeit stellt, informiert nicht, sondern verwirrt. Das #Altpapier zeigt, wie diese Praxis den Journalismus selbst beschädigt. #Medienkritik

@primonatura@mstdn.social
2026-02-13 13:01:01

"Pesticides found in 70% of European soils, harming beneficial life: Study"
#Europe #Pesticides #Soil

An April 2025 study published in the prominent journal Nature found tantalizing evidence that the herpes zoster – or #shingles#vaccine
👍could lower the risk of #dementia in the general population by as much as 20%❗️
A …

@inthehands@hachyderm.io
2025-11-29 16:06:15

The headline should be: ❝AI vendor’s AI-generated analysis claims AI generated reviews for AI-generated papers at AI conference❞
To be clear, I give great credence to the claims of the humans in the article who thought they’d received an AI-generated review. I bet •they’re• correct. It’s Nature I’m coming after here.
A journalistic institution would investigate that claim, track down the reviewer in question, get to the bottom of the story. A PR outlet would just repeat some vendor’s product claims as fact and click “publish.”
Which one is Nature?
/end