Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-13 09:18:02

Addressing the Heterogeneity of Visualization in an Introductory PhD Course in the Swedish Context
Kostiantyn Kucher, Niklas R\"onnberg, Jonas L\"owgren
arxiv.org/abs/2508.08958

@arXiv_csCR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-10 07:59:41

The Signalgate Case is Waiving a Red Flag to All Organizational and Behavioral Cybersecurity Leaders, Practitioners, and Researchers: Are We Receiving the Signal Amidst the Noise?
Paul Benjamin Lowry, Gregory D. Moody, Robert Willison, Clay Posey
arxiv.org/abs/2509.07053

@cdamian@rls.social
2025-09-12 11:27:17

Friday Links 25-19
Small selection today. Some good reads, about the job market, corporate job, and a good podcasts about teams & AI.
christof.damian.net/2025/09/fr

@arXiv_csSE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-12 08:07:59

Pattern-Based File and Data Access with Python Glob: A Comprehensive Guide for Computational Research
Sidney Shapiro
arxiv.org/abs/2509.08843

@NFL@darktundra.xyz
2025-08-11 10:01:53

Before the Super Bowls, the Chiefs were at rock bottom. One blueprint changed everything nytimes.com/athletic/6210303/2

@curiouscat@fosstodon.org
2025-09-11 13:23:47

"you have to try to build that strong organizational structure; one that isn’t so fragile that when one or two senior leaders change, things fall apart. But it’s very difficult and many organizations have weak management systems..."

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-10 09:55:01

Getting In Contract with Large Language Models -- An Agency Theory Perspective On Large Language Model Alignment
Sascha Kaltenpoth, Oliver M\"uller
arxiv.org/abs/2509.07642

@arXiv_csSI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-11 07:42:12

Network Contagion in Financial Labor Markets: Predicting Turnover in Hong Kong
Abdulla AlKetbi, Patrick Yam, Gautier Marti, Raed Jaradat
arxiv.org/abs/2509.08001

@Jeff@mastodon.opencloud.lu
2025-08-29 10:21:31

Building organisational resilience through ISO 22301
"Today’s world is unpredictable. From cyber threats and pandemics to natural disasters, organizations must be ready to keep running, no matter what happens. A structured Business Continuity Management System – BCMS is no longer a luxury but a necessity. (...)
Understanding ISO 22301: A Framework for Resilience"

@arXiv_econTH_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-08 08:53:50

Interactions across multiple games: cooperation, corruption, and organizational design
Jonathan Bendor, Lukas Bolte, Nicole Immorlica, Matthew O. Jackson
arxiv.org/abs/2507.03030

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-11 08:39:50

Do Ethical AI Principles Matter to Users? A Large-Scale Analysis of User Sentiment and Satisfaction
Stefan Pasch, Min Chul Cha
arxiv.org/abs/2508.05913

@arXiv_csCR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-11 09:23:39

Leveraging large language models for SQL behavior-based database intrusion detection
Meital Shlezinger, Shay Akirav, Lei Zhou, Liang Guo, Avi Kessel, Guoliang Li
arxiv.org/abs/2508.05690

@arXiv_csCY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-01 07:33:03

From Model Design to Organizational Design: Complexity Redistribution and Trade-Offs in Generative AI
Sharique Hasan, Alexander Oettl, Sampsa Samila
arxiv.org/abs/2506.22440

@arXiv_eessSY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-09 10:27:42

Human-Hardware-in-the-Loop simulations for systemic resilience assessment in cyber-socio-technical systems
Francesco Simone, Marco Bortolini, Giovanni Mazzuto, Giulio di Gravio, Riccardo Patriarca
arxiv.org/abs/2509.06657

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-06 10:24:10

FairLangProc: A Python package for fairness in NLP
Arturo P\'erez-Peralta, Sandra Ben\'itez-Pe\~na, Rosa E. Lillo
arxiv.org/abs/2508.03677

@UP8@mastodon.social
2025-07-03 19:14:50

🦜 Gossip, redefined: Research shows the surprising power of positive talk in teams
#work

@arXiv_hepph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-08 09:18:52

Rediscovering the Standard Model with AI
Aya Abdelhaq, Pellegrino Piantadosi, Fernando Quevedo
arxiv.org/abs/2508.04923 arxiv.org/pdf/2508.…

@arXiv_csDB_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-15 08:03:42

Cross-Organizational Analysis of Parliamentary Processes: A Case Study
Paul-Julius Hillmann, Stephan A. Fahrenkrog-Petersen, Jan Mendling
arxiv.org/abs/2508.10381

@Techmeme@techhub.social
2025-06-18 13:51:21

The Midas Project and Tech Oversight Project release The OpenAI Files, a 50 page analysis of OpenAI's governance, leadership, and organizational culture (Hayden Field/The Verge)
theverge.com/openai/688783/the

@patrick_townsend@infosec.exchange
2025-08-01 18:08:55

Assessing security and privacy
I sometimes get asked how I think about and evaluate the security and privacy of Internet services and applications. For me, a number of factors come into focus when assessing the privacy of an application or service. Some of the factors are technological and some of them are human, social and organizational. Additionally, some of the factors are critical to ensure privacy and some are important but less critical.
 
I think we need a new model …

@arXiv_csCR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-09 12:07:02

An Ethically Grounded LLM-Based Approach to Insider Threat Synthesis and Detection
Haywood Gelman, John D. Hastings, David Kenley
arxiv.org/abs/2509.06920

@arXiv_csSE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-06 09:56:20

Agentic AI in 6G Software Businesses: A Layered Maturity Model
Muhammad Zohaib, Muhammad Azeem Akbar, Sami Hyrynsalmi, Arif Ali Khan
arxiv.org/abs/2508.03393

@ErikJonker@mastodon.social
2025-08-15 07:24:59

After having looked at eIDAS and the dutch implementation of digital identity, it is very interesting to read this paper, a proposal that tries to improve on various aspects from eiDAS.
"An Architecture for Distributed Digital Identities in the Physical World"
arxiv.org/abs/2508.10185

@laimis@mstdn.social
2025-06-19 14:09:48

This seems like a cry for help from a few remaining honest individuals at #openai:
openaifiles.org/
This is why I do not use their LLMs, regardless how powerful their models might be. W…

@arXiv_condmatsoft_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-01 08:37:41

Active Filaments on Curved Surfaces: From Single Filaments to Dilute Suspensions
Giulia Janzen, Euan D. Mackay, Rastko Sknepnek, D. A. Matoz-Fernandez
arxiv.org/abs/2507.23616

@rene_mobile@infosec.exchange
2025-08-15 07:01:49

I am very happy to announce that our big architecture paper for the Digidow project on distributed digital identity systems with biometric authentication for physical interaction is now online on arXiv: arxiv.org/abs/2508.10185.
While it can't have all the details, it summarizes the main de…

@arXiv_csLG_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-22 10:03:31

Fairness for the People, by the People: Minority Collective Action
Omri Ben-Dov, Samira Samadi, Amartya Sanyal, Alexandru \c{T}ifrea
arxiv.org/abs/2508.15374

@arXiv_csCY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-26 11:11:57

What is digital about abstraction?
Bernhard Rieder
arxiv.org/abs/2508.18181 arxiv.org/pdf/2508.18181

@curiouscat@fosstodon.org
2025-08-20 14:57:33

...John says if you focus on building the capability in the organization to understand variation and to appreciate how to use #data - then you are on the right path, and can increase your influence in addition.
“You need to build into the organization things like a focus on pleasing the customer instead of pleasing your boss.” When combining all of these methods, that is when your

@arXiv_physicssocph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-01 08:46:33

Advocacy for Physics and for Physicists: Results of an Informal Survey of American Physical Society Members in 2025
Michael B. Bennett (for the Physics Advocacy Collaboration)
arxiv.org/abs/2506.24043

@arXiv_qbioNC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-29 08:43:11

Signed Higher-Order Interactions for Brain Disorder Diagnosis via Multi-Channel Transformers
Dengyi Zhao, Zhiheng Zhou, Guiying Yan, Dongxiao Yu, Xingqi Qi
arxiv.org/abs/2507.20205

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-06-21 02:34:13

Why AI can't possibly make you more productive; long
#AI and "productivity", some thoughts:
Edit: fixed some typos.
Productivity is a concept that isn't entirely meaningless outside the context of capitalism, but it's a concept that is heavily inflected in a capitalist context. In many uses today it effectively means "how much you can satisfy and/or exceed your boss' expectations." This is not really what it should mean: even in an anarchist utopia, people would care about things like how many shirts they can produce in a week, although in an "I'd like to voluntarily help more people" way rather than an "I need to meet this quota to earn my survival" way. But let's roll with this definition for a second, because it's almost certainly what your boss means when they say "productivity", and understanding that word in a different (even if truer) sense is therefore inherently dangerous.
Accepting "productivity" to mean "satisfying your boss' expectations," I will now claim: the use of generative AI cannot increase your productivity.
Before I dive in, it's imperative to note that the big generative models which most people think of as constituting "AI" today are evil. They are 1: pouring fuel on our burning planet, 2: psychologically strip-mining a class of data laborers who are exploited for their precarity, 3: enclosing, exploiting, and polluting the digital commons, and 4: stealing labor from broad classes of people many of whom are otherwise glad to give that labor away for free provided they get a simple acknowledgement in return. Any of these four "ethical issues" should be enough *alone* to cause everyone to simply not use the technology. These ethical issues are the reason that I do not use generative AI right now, except for in extremely extenuating circumstances. These issues are also convincing for a wide range of people I talk to, from experts to those with no computer science background. So before I launch into a critique of the effectiveness of generative AI, I want to emphasize that such a critique should be entirely unnecessary.
But back to my thesis: generative AI cannot increase your productivity, where "productivity" has been defined as "how much you can satisfy and/or exceed your boss' expectations."
Why? In fact, what the fuck? Every AI booster I've met has claimed the opposite. They've given me personal examples of time saved by using generative AI. Some of them even truly believe this. Sometimes I even believe they saved time without horribly compromising on quality (and often, your boss doesn't care about quality anyways if the lack of quality is hard to measure of doesn't seem likely to impact short-term sales/feedback/revenue). So if generative AI genuinely lets you write more emails in a shorter period of time, or close more tickets, or something else along these lines, how can I say it isn't increasing your ability to meet your boss' expectations?
The problem is simple: your boss' expectations are not a fixed target. Never have been. In virtue of being someone who oversees and pays wages to others under capitalism, your boss' game has always been: pay you less than the worth of your labor, so that they can accumulate profit and thus more capital to remain in charge instead of being forced into working for a wage themselves. Sure, there are layers of management caught in between who aren't fully in this mode, but they are irrelevant to this analysis. It matters not how much you please your manager if your CEO thinks your work is not worth the wages you are being paid. And using AI actively lowers the value of your work relative to your wages.
Why do I say that? It's actually true in several ways. The most obvious: using generative AI lowers the quality of your work, because the work it produces is shot through with errors, and when your job is reduced to proofreading slop, you are bound to tire a bit, relax your diligence, and let some mistakes through. More than you would have if you are actually doing and taking pride in the work. Examples are innumerable and frequent, from journalists to lawyers to programmers, and we laugh at them "haha how stupid to not check whether the books the AI reviewed for you actually existed!" but on a deeper level if we're honest we know we'd eventually make the same mistake ourselves (bonus game: spot the swipe-typing typos I missed in this post; I'm sure there will be some).
But using generative AI also lowers the value of your work in another much more frightening way: in this era of hype, it demonstrates to your boss that you could be replaced by AI. The more you use it, and no matter how much you can see that your human skills are really necessary to correct its mistakes, the more it appears to your boss that they should hire the AI instead of you. Or perhaps retain 10% of the people in roles like yours to manage the AI doing the other 90% of the work. Paradoxically, the *more* you get done in terms of raw output using generative AI, the more it looks to your boss as if there's an opportunity to get enough work done with even fewer expensive humans. Of course, the decision to fire you and lean more heavily into AI isn't really a good one for long-term profits and success, but the modern boss did not get where they are by considering long-term profits. By using AI, you are merely demonstrating your redundancy, and the more you get done with it, the more redundant you seem.
In fact, there's even a third dimension to this: by using generative AI, you're also providing its purveyors with invaluable training data that allows them to make it better at replacing you. It's generally quite shitty right now, but the more use it gets by competent & clever people, the better it can become at the tasks those specific people use it for. Using the currently-popular algorithm family, there are limits to this; I'm not saying it will eventually transcend the mediocrity it's entwined with. But it can absolutely go from underwhelmingly mediocre to almost-reasonably mediocre with the right training data, and data from prompting sessions is both rarer and more useful than the base datasets it's built on.
For all of these reasons, using generative AI in your job is a mistake that will likely lead to your future unemployment. To reiterate, you should already not be using it because it is evil and causes specific and inexcusable harms, but in case like so many you just don't care about those harms, I've just explained to you why for entirely selfish reasons you should not use it.
If you're in a position where your boss is forcing you to use it, my condolences. I suggest leaning into its failures instead of trying to get the most out of it, and as much as possible, showing your boss very clearly how it wastes your time and makes things slower. Also, point out the dangers of legal liability for its mistakes, and make sure your boss is aware of the degree to which any of your AI-eager coworkers are producing low-quality work that harms organizational goals.
Also, if you've read this far and aren't yet of an anarchist mindset, I encourage you to think about the implications of firing 75% of (at least the white-collar) workforce in order to make more profit while fueling the climate crisis and in most cases also propping up dictatorial figureheads in government. When *either* the AI bubble bursts *or* if the techbros get to live out the beginnings of their worker-replacement fantasies, there are going to be an unimaginable number of economically desperate people living in increasingly expensive times. I'm the kind of optimist who thinks that the resulting social crucible, though perhaps through terrible violence, will lead to deep social changes that effectively unseat from power the ultra-rich that continue to drag us all down this destructive path, and I think its worth some thinking now about what you might want the succeeding stable social configuration to look like so you can advocate towards that during points of malleability.
As others have said more eloquently, generative AI *should* be a technology that makes human lives on average easier, and it would be were it developed & controlled by humanists. The only reason that it's not, is that it's developed and controlled by terrible greedy people who use their unfairly hoarded wealth to immiserate the rest of us in order to maintain their dominance. In the long run, for our very survival, we need to depose them, and I look forward to what the term "generative AI" will mean after that finally happens.

@arXiv_econEM_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-28 07:41:10

Batched Adaptive Network Formation
Yan Xu, Bo Zhou
arxiv.org/abs/2507.18961 arxiv.org/pdf/2507.18961

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-19 09:58:20

Organization Matters: A Qualitative Study of Organizational Dynamics in Red Teaming Practices For Generative AI
Bixuan Ren, EunJeong Cheon, Jianghui Li
arxiv.org/abs/2508.12504

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-01 10:18:11

Role-Aware Language Models for Secure and Contextualized Access Control in Organizations
Saeed Almheiri, Yerulan Kongrat, Adrian Santosh, Ruslan Tasmukhanov, Josemaria Vera, Muhammad Dehan Al Kautsar, Fajri Koto
arxiv.org/abs/2507.23465

@arXiv_econGN_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-29 09:03:41

Organisational justice moderates the link between leadership, work engagement and innovation work behaviour
Rahmat Sabuhari, Rusman Soleman, Marwan Man Soleman, Johan Fahri, Muhammad Rachmat
arxiv.org/abs/2508.20320

@arXiv_csSE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-03 10:19:33

Non Technical Debt in Agile Software Development
Muhammad Ovais Ahmad, Tomas Gustavsson
arxiv.org/abs/2509.01445 arxiv.org/pdf/2509.01445…

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-05 09:34:01

Would I regret being different? The influence of social norms on attitudes toward AI usage
Jaroslaw Kornowicz, Maurice Pape, Kirsten Thommes
arxiv.org/abs/2509.04241

@arXiv_csSI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-01 07:37:33

Modular versus Hierarchical: A Structural Signature of Topic Popularity in Mathematical Research
Brian Hepler
arxiv.org/abs/2506.22946

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-22 09:57:01

From Bits to Boardrooms: A Cutting-Edge Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Business Excellence
Zihao Wang, Junming Zhang
arxiv.org/abs/2508.15447

@arXiv_csCR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-03 13:46:03

Are Enterprises Ready for Quantum-Safe Cybersecurity?
Tran Duc Le, Phuc Hao Do, Truong Duy Dinh, Van Dai Pham
arxiv.org/abs/2509.01731 arxi…

@arXiv_csDB_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-23 09:28:40

Data-Agnostic Cardinality Learning from Imperfect Workloads
Peizhi Wu, Rong Kang, Tieying Zhang, Jianjun Chen, Ryan Marcus, Zachary G. Ives
arxiv.org/abs/2506.16007

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-21 08:06:40

Exploring Organizational Strategies in Immersive Computational Notebooks
Sungwon In, Ayush Roy, Eric Krokos, Kirsten Whitley, Chris North, Yalong Yang
arxiv.org/abs/2508.14346

@arXiv_csSE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-31 09:50:12

Secure coding for web applications: Frameworks, challenges, and the role of LLMs
Kiana Kiashemshaki, Mohammad Jalili Torkamani, Negin Mahmoudi
arxiv.org/abs/2507.22223

@arXiv_csCY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-28 08:38:31

What Makes AI Applications Acceptable or Unacceptable? A Predictive Moral Framework
Kimmo Eriksson, Simon Karlsson, Irina Vartanova, Pontus Strimling
arxiv.org/abs/2508.19317

@arXiv_qbioNC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-22 08:37:40

The Role of Excitatory Parvalbumin-positive Neurons in the Tectofugal Pathway of Pigeon (Columba livia) Hierarchical Visual Processing
Shan Lu, Xiaoteng Zhang, Yueyang Cang, Shihao Pan, Yanyan Peng, Xinwei Li, Shaoju Zeng, Yingjie Zhu, Li Shi
arxiv.org/abs/2507.15486

@arXiv_csCY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-27 07:46:53

The Accessibility Paradox: How Blind and Low Vision Employees Experience and Negotiate Accessibility in the Technology Industry
Aparajita Marathe, Anne Marie Piper
arxiv.org/abs/2508.18492

@arXiv_statAP_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-25 09:11:40

Nonlinear Rank Scaling and Hidden Structure in NHS Expenditure Transparency Data
Animotu Mohammed, Golnaz Shahtahmassebi, Haroldo V. Ribeiro, Jack Sutton, Quentin S. Hanley
arxiv.org/abs/2506.19520

@arXiv_csCR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-25 07:47:29

Network Structures as an Attack Surface: Topology-Based Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning
Murtaza Rangwala, Richard O. Sinnott, Rajkumar Buyya
arxiv.org/abs/2506.19260

@arXiv_csSE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-25 09:17:40

LLM-Assisted Semantic Alignment and Integration in Collaborative Model-Based Systems Engineering Using SysML v2
Zirui Li, Stephan Husung, Haoze Wang
arxiv.org/abs/2508.16181

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-31 09:11:41

A Node on the Constellation: The Role of Feminist Makerspaces in Building and Sustaining Alternative Cultures of Technology Production
Erin Gatz, Yasmine Kotturi, Andrea Afua Kwamya, Sarah Fox
arxiv.org/abs/2507.22329

@arXiv_csSE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-23 08:07:39

How Do Community Smells Influence Self-Admitted Technical Debt in Machine Learning Projects?
Shamse Tasnim Cynthia, Nuri Almarimi, Banani Roy
arxiv.org/abs/2506.15884

@arXiv_csCY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-20 09:41:20

The AI-Fraud Diamond: A Novel Lens for Auditing Algorithmic Deception
Benjamin Zweers, Diptish Dey, Debarati Bhaumik
arxiv.org/abs/2508.13984

@arXiv_csCR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-17 09:37:51

Exploiting AI for Attacks: On the Interplay between Adversarial AI and Offensive AI
Saskia Laura Schr\"oer, Luca Pajola, Alberto Castagnaro, Giovanni Apruzzese, Mauro Conti
arxiv.org/abs/2506.12519

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-21 08:05:30

From Firms to Computation: AI Governance and the Evolution of Institutions
Michael S. Harre
arxiv.org/abs/2507.13616

@arXiv_csSE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-19 10:18:50

Influencia de fatores organizacionais e sociais na etapa de levantamento de requisitos
Glauber da Rocha Balthazar, Marcia Ito
arxiv.org/abs/2508.13134

@arXiv_csCR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-15 09:32:02

An Architecture for Distributed Digital Identities in the Physical World
Ren\'e Mayrhofer, Michael Roland, Tobias H\"oller, Philipp Hofer, Mario Lins
arxiv.org/abs/2508.10185