
2025-08-19 19:38:32
Who would've thought that philosophical, lyrical #motorcycle video essays are a thing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kz3ceOIjSdU
Who would've thought that philosophical, lyrical #motorcycle video essays are a thing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kz3ceOIjSdU
A Logic of Stability: Formalizing Similarity in Counterfactual Reasoning
Marta Esteves
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.12502 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.12502
Cognitive scientist Margaret Boden, whose books helped shape the philosophical conversation about human intelligence and AI, passed away on July 18 at age 88 (Michael S. Rosenwald/New York Times)
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/14/science…
There’s no doubting the seriousness with which Braxton approaches his art – this is a major composer, who with his Tri-Axium writings, has developed a musico-philosophical system of cosmic complexity – but the sense of adventure and fun he brings to these enterprises is undeniable. Braxton describes himself as "a professional student of music" and his enthusiasm for new ideas and possibilities is inspiring.
How Benchmark's investment in Chinese startup Manus has highlighted a philosophical divide in Silicon Valley over China, patriotism, and the pursuit of profit (Bloomberg)
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-07-1…
La \'Ultima Frontera de La Filosof\'ia: Hacia una S\'intesis de La \'Etica del Futuro a Largo Plazo, el Riesgo Existencial y la Ontolog\'ia Posthumana
Santos E. Moreta Reyes
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11568
Really enjoyed @…’s thoughtful and entertaining talk at #smashingconf today! Amazing to see how philosophical ideas influenced the design of iA’s apps and what designers can and could learn from philosophy – and vice versa. A lot of food for thought!…
There are some deep philosophical questions such as "Could god create a stone so heavy that god could not lift it?"
So I wonder, could Space X create a rocket so powerful that it could send trump, miller, noem, and rfk-jr to Mars?
It is certainly worth a try.
Uncertainty Awareness and Trust in Explainable AI- On Trust Calibration using Local and Global Explanations
Carina Newen, Daniel Bodemer, Sonja Glantz, Emmanuel M\"uller, Magdalena Wischnewski, Lenka Schnaubert
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08989
Ghost in the Machine: Examining the Philosophical Implications of Recursive Algorithms in Artificial Intelligence Systems
Llewellin RG Jegels
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.01967
HumanAgencyBench: Scalable Evaluation of Human Agency Support in AI Assistants
Benjamin Sturgeon, Daniel Samuelson, Jacob Haimes, Jacy Reese Anthis
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08494
Say it together with me now: Indigenous people WERE (and ARE) using the land.
https://nebula.tv/videos/philosophytube-how-colonisers-lied-about-indian-land-use/
# Philosophical test fails ChatGPT: AI coherence isn’t enough to prove human mind
The research reveals that #ChatGPT does exhibit proficiency in basic coherence building. It maintains consistent dictional and intentional lines by reusing phrases and aligning responses with contextual topics. It also demonstrates some ability to construct rational coherence by offering logically consistent replies…
The most influential philosophers in Wikipedia: a multicultural analysis
Guillaume Rollin, Jos\'e Lages
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06034 https://
Futurity as Infrastructure: A Techno-Philosophical Interpretation of the AI Lifecycle
Mark Cote, Susana Aires
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15680 https://arxi…
Discursive and Non-Discursive Reasoning in Chinese Philosophy
https://ift.tt/jwXndTc
CFP: The (After) Lives of Things: Deconstructing and Reconstructing Material Culture, Association of…
via Input 4 RELCFP
Using Large Language Models to Study Mathematical Practice
William D'Alessandro
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.02873 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.02873
Just read this post by @… on an optimistic AGI future, and while it had some interesting and worthwhile ideas, it's also in my opinion dangerously misguided, and plays into the current AGI hype in a harmful way.
https://social.coop/@eloquence/114940607434005478
My criticisms include:
- Current LLM technology has many layers, but the biggest most capable models are all tied to corporate datacenters and require inordinate amounts of every and water use to run. Trying to use these tools to bring about a post-scarcity economy will burn up the planet. We urgently need more-capable but also vastly more efficient AI technologies if we want to use AI for a post-scarcity economy, and we are *not* nearly on the verge of this despite what the big companies pushing LLMs want us to think.
- I can see that permacommons.org claims a small level of expenses on AI equates to low climate impact. However, given current deep subsidies on place by the big companies to attract users, that isn't a great assumption. The fact that their FAQ dodges the question about which AI systems they use isn't a great look.
- These systems are not free in the same way that Wikipedia or open-source software is. To run your own model you need a data harvesting & cleaning operation that costs millions of dollars minimum, and then you need millions of dollars worth of storage & compute to train & host the models. Right now, big corporations are trying to compete for market share by heavily subsidizing these things, but it you go along with that, you become dependent on them, and you'll be screwed when they jack up the price to a profitable level later. I'd love to see open dataset initiatives SBD the like, and there are some of these things, but not enough yet, and many of the initiatives focus on one problem while ignoring others (fine for research but not the basis for a society yet).
- Between the environmental impacts, the horrible labor conditions and undercompensation of data workers who filter the big datasets, and the impacts of both AI scrapers and AI commons pollution, the developers of the most popular & effective LLMs have a lot of answer for. This project only really mentions environmental impacts, which makes me think that they're not serious about ethics, which in turn makes me distrustful of the whole enterprise.
- Their language also ends up encouraging AI use broadly while totally ignoring several entire classes of harm, so they're effectively contributing to AI hype, especially with such casual talk of AGI and robotics as if embodied AGI were just around the corner. To be clear about this point: we are several breakthroughs away from AGI under the most optimistic assumptions, and giving the impression that those will happen soon plays directly into the hands of the Sam Altmans of the world who are trying to make money off the impression of impending huge advances in AI capabilities. Adding to the AI hype is irresponsible.
- I've got a more philosophical criticism that I'll post about separately.
I do think that the idea of using AI & other software tools, possibly along with robotics and funded by many local cooperatives, in order to make businesses obsolete before they can do the same to all workers, is a good one. Get your local library to buy a knitting machine alongside their 3D printer.
Lately I've felt too busy criticizing AI to really sit down and think about what I do want the future to look like, even though I'm a big proponent of positive visions for the future as a force multiplier for criticism, and this article is inspiring to me in that regard, even if the specific project doesn't seem like a good one.
Operating system drama is basically YouTube drama but with way more keyboard clacking and less ukuleles. Friends turn into rivals overnight just because of which OS you use. It is wild to see people treat software choices like reality TV show rivalries.
What makes me even sadder is how something that should come from understanding and research turns into a full-blown philosophical fight. Choosing an OS should be about what works for you, not a reason to start a digital soap opera.
We may see more of Micah Parsons as a standing free rusher in 2025 https://insidethestar.com/we-may-see-more-of-micah-parsons-as-a-standing-free-rusher-in-2025
Started reading Naomi Klein's "Doppelganger", a book about how she is often mixed up with Naomi Wolf (former feminist icon turned conspiracy nut/grifter). It's... tedious. I haven't gotten to the parts that are praised on the back cover yet. So far it has been 100 densely-printed pages of philosophical and historical treatise. Interesting for sure, but I would have preferred this as a much much shorter essay so far. Will continue to read, but it's work.
Basic scientists' disproportionate impact amid applied drift reveals structural asymmetry in science
Rikuei Kaku, Mikako Bito, Keita Nishimoto, Ichiro Sakata, Kimitaka Asatani
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.01530
Abstraction, Explanation, and Effective Field Theories
Martin King
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03582 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.03582
Can Machines Philosophize?
Michele Pizzochero, Giorgia Dellaferrera
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00675 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.00675…
Non-Robustness of the Zero-Temperature-Limit Gibbs Measures to Perturbations of the Potential
L\'eo Gayral, Mathieu Sablik
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.18325 https://
Discursive and Non-Discursive Reasoning in Chinese Philosophy
https://ift.tt/wji3Fq6
CFP: The (After) Lives of Things: Deconstructing and Reconstructing Material Culture, Association of…
via Input 4 RELCFP
No Such Thing as Free Brain Time: For a Pigouvian Tax on Attention Capture
Hamza Belgroun (Sciences Po, UniCA, CNRS, WIMMICS, Laboratoire I3S - SPARKS), Franck Michel (Laboratoire I3S - SPARKS, WIMMICS), Fabien Gandon (WIMMICS, Laboratoire I3S - SPARKS)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06453
The Application of Virtual Environments and Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Experimental Findings in Philosophy Teaching
Adel Vehrer, Zsolt Palfalusi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.00110
Towards a Large Physics Benchmark
Kristian G. Barman, Sascha Caron, Faegheh Hasibi, Eugene Shalugin, Yoris Marcet, Johannes Otte, Henk W. de Regt, Merijn Moody
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21695
Discursive and Non-Discursive Reasoning in Chinese Philosophy
https://ift.tt/SygaMhU
APPLY: LGBTQ Religious Archives Network Fall Intership—$1500 Stipend Riot Mueller 07/25/2024 -…
via Input 4 RELCFP
The Philosophy and Physics of Duality
Sebastian De Haro, Jeremy Butterfield
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01616 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.01616
Discursive and Non-Discursive Reasoning in Chinese Philosophy
https://ift.tt/h6zSPrA
APPLY: LGBTQ Religious Archives Network Fall Intership—$1500 Stipend Riot Mueller 07/25/2024 -…
via Input 4 RELCFP
The Xeno Sutra: Can Meaning and Value be Ascribed to an AI-Generated "Sacred" Text?
Murray Shanahan, Tara Das, Robert Thurman
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.20525 https://…
Epistemic Trade-Off: An Analysis of the Operational Breakdown and Ontological Limits of "Certainty-Scope" in AI
Generoso Immediato
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.19304 htt…
Discursive and Non-Discursive Reasoning in Chinese Philosophy
https://ift.tt/ToKYGZQ
Wan on Thusi, 'Policing Bodies: Law, Sex Work, and Desire in Johannesburg' Thusi, I.…
via Input 4 RELCFP
Antirealism in sheep's clothing: Wave function realism and scientific realism
Raoni Arroyo, Jonas R. Becker Arenhart
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21615 https://
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Human Thought
R\'enald Gesnot
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16628 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.16628
Discursive and Non-Discursive Reasoning in Chinese Philosophy
https://ift.tt/pExqwSR
Wan on Thusi, 'Policing Bodies: Law, Sex Work, and Desire in Johannesburg' Thusi, I.…
via Input 4 RELCFP
Making AI Inevitable: Historical Perspective and the Problems of Predicting Long-Term Technological Change
Mark Fisher, John Severini
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16692 https://…
Discursive and Non-Discursive Reasoning in Chinese Philosophy
https://ift.tt/B5OJ8o6
Hagley History Hangout/New Episode Artists bring a unique perspective to historical…
via Input 4 RELCFP h…
Discursive and Non-Discursive Reasoning in Chinese Philosophy
https://ift.tt/0WflZr7
Hagley History Hangout/New Episode Artists bring a unique perspective to historical…
via Input 4 RELCFP h…
Shadow in the Galactic Center: Theoretical Concept -- Prediction -- Realization
Alexander F. Zakharov
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16927 https://
Discursive and Non-Discursive Reasoning in Chinese Philosophy https://networks.h-net.org/group/announcements/20072183/discursive-and-non-discursive-reasoning-chinese-philosophy