Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-16 09:39:11

Solving Integrated Periodic Railway Timetabling with Satisfiability Modulo Theories: A Scalable Approach to Routing and Vehicle Circulation
Florian Fuchs, Bernardo Martin-Iradi, Francesco Corman
arxiv.org/abs/2507.11489

@arXiv_csDS_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-16 07:53:51

Solving Linear Programs with Differential Privacy
Alina Ene, Huy Le Nguyen, Ta Duy Nguyen, Adrian Vladu
arxiv.org/abs/2507.10946

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-14 08:55:32

AWorld: Dynamic Multi-Agent System with Stable Maneuvering for Robust GAIA Problem Solving
Zhitian Xie, Qintong Wu, Chengyue Yu, Chenyi Zhuang, Jinjie Gu
arxiv.org/abs/2508.09889

@arXiv_physicsoptics_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-16 09:56:41

Solving Distance-Based Optimization Problems Using Optical Hardware
Guangyao Li, Richard Zhipeng Wang, Natalia G. Berloff
arxiv.org/abs/2507.11378

@arXiv_mathNA_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-16 08:42:40

Error Analysis of Truncation Legendre Method for Solving Numerical Differentiation
Maksym Kyselov
arxiv.org/abs/2506.11529

@arXiv_mathNT_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-12 08:37:41

Solving the Decision Principal Ideal Problem with Pre-processing
Jincheng Zhuang, Qi Cheng
arxiv.org/abs/2506.09605 a…

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-16 10:33:11

Reasoning Strategies in Large Language Models: Can They Follow, Prefer, and Optimize?
Yanjian Zhang, Guillaume Wisniewski, Nadi Tomeh, Thierry Charnois
arxiv.org/abs/2507.11423

@arXiv_nlinAO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-16 09:00:29

Solving Inverse Problems in Stochastic Self-Organising Systems through Invariant Representations
Elias Najarro, Nicolas Bessone, Sebastian Risi
arxiv.org/abs/2506.11796

@arXiv_physicsedph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-12 08:37:13

Teaching Problem Solving in Undergraduate Physics Courses: An Endorsement for Deliberate Practice
Kelly Miller, Olivia Miller, Georgia Lawrence
arxiv.org/abs/2508.08133

@arXiv_hepph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-16 09:18:51

When CP requires $\bar\theta=0$, not $\bar\theta=\pi$
Luca Vecchi
arxiv.org/abs/2507.10680 arxiv.org/pdf/2507.10680…

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-13 09:36:52

Solving the Market Split Problem with Lattice Enumeration
Alfred Wassermann
arxiv.org/abs/2508.08702 arxiv.org/pdf/2508.08702

@arXiv_csDS_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-16 07:42:21

Solving Random Planted CSPs below the $n^{k/2}$ Threshold
Arpon Basu, Jun-Ting Hsieh, Andrew D. Lin, Peter Manohar
arxiv.org/abs/2507.10833

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-08 09:25:22

Metacognition and self-regulated learning in manipulative robotic problem-solving task
Margarida Romero (UniCA, UIC, LINE), George Kalmpourtzis
arxiv.org/abs/2508.05112

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-08-04 15:49:00

Should we teach vibe coding? Here's why not.
Should AI coding be taught in undergrad CS education?
1/2
I teach undergraduate computer science labs, including for intro and more-advanced core courses. I don't publish (non-negligible) scholarly work in the area, but I've got years of craft expertise in course design, and I do follow the academic literature to some degree. In other words, In not the world's leading expert, but I have spent a lot of time thinking about course design, and consider myself competent at it, with plenty of direct experience in what knowledge & skills I can expect from students as they move through the curriculum.
I'm also strongly against most uses of what's called "AI" these days (specifically, generative deep neutral networks as supplied by our current cadre of techbro). There are a surprising number of completely orthogonal reasons to oppose the use of these systems, and a very limited number of reasonable exceptions (overcoming accessibility barriers is an example). On the grounds of environmental and digital-commons-pollution costs alone, using specifically the largest/newest models is unethical in most cases.
But as any good teacher should, I constantly question these evaluations, because I worry about the impact on my students should I eschew teaching relevant tech for bad reasons (and even for his reasons). I also want to make my reasoning clear to students, who should absolutely question me on this. That inspired me to ask a simple question: ignoring for one moment the ethical objections (which we shouldn't, of course; they're very stark), at what level in the CS major could I expect to teach a course about programming with AI assistance, and expect students to succeed at a more technically demanding final project than a course at the same level where students were banned from using AI? In other words, at what level would I expect students to actually benefit from AI coding "assistance?"
To be clear, I'm assuming that students aren't using AI in other aspects of coursework: the topic of using AI to "help you study" is a separate one (TL;DR it's gross value is not negative, but it's mostly not worth the harm to your metacognitive abilities, which AI-induced changes to the digital commons are making more important than ever).
So what's my answer to this question?
If I'm being incredibly optimistic, senior year. Slightly less optimistic, second year of a masters program. Realistic? Maybe never.
The interesting bit for you-the-reader is: why is this my answer? (Especially given that students would probably self-report significant gains at lower levels.) To start with, [this paper where experienced developers thought that AI assistance sped up their work on real tasks when in fact it slowed it down] (arxiv.org/abs/2507.09089) is informative. There are a lot of differences in task between experienced devs solving real bugs and students working on a class project, but it's important to understand that we shouldn't have a baseline expectation that AI coding "assistants" will speed things up in the best of circumstances, and we shouldn't trust self-reports of productivity (or the AI hype machine in general).
Now we might imagine that coding assistants will be better at helping with a student project than at helping with fixing bugs in open-source software, since it's a much easier task. For many programming assignments that have a fixed answer, we know that many AI assistants can just spit out a solution based on prompting them with the problem description (there's another elephant in the room here to do with learning outcomes regardless of project success, but we'll ignore this over too, my focus here is on project complexity reach, not learning outcomes). My question is about more open-ended projects, not assignments with an expected answer. Here's a second study (by one of my colleagues) about novices using AI assistance for programming tasks. It showcases how difficult it is to use AI tools well, and some of these stumbling blocks that novices in particular face.
But what about intermediate students? Might there be some level where the AI is helpful because the task is still relatively simple and the students are good enough to handle it? The problem with this is that as task complexity increases, so does the likelihood of the AI generating (or copying) code that uses more complex constructs which a student doesn't understand. Let's say I have second year students writing interactive websites with JavaScript. Without a lot of care that those students don't know how to deploy, the AI is likely to suggest code that depends on several different frameworks, from React to JQuery, without actually setting up or including those frameworks, and of course three students would be way out of their depth trying to do that. This is a general problem: each programming class carefully limits the specific code frameworks and constructs it expects students to know based on the material it covers. There is no feasible way to limit an AI assistant to a fixed set of constructs or frameworks, using current designs. There are alternate designs where this would be possible (like AI search through adaptation from a controlled library of snippets) but those would be entirely different tools.
So what happens on a sizeable class project where the AI has dropped in buggy code, especially if it uses code constructs the students don't understand? Best case, they understand that they don't understand and re-prompt, or ask for help from an instructor or TA quickly who helps them get rid of the stuff they don't understand and re-prompt or manually add stuff they do. Average case: they waste several hours and/or sweep the bugs partly under the rug, resulting in a project with significant defects. Students in their second and even third years of a CS major still have a lot to learn about debugging, and usually have significant gaps in their knowledge of even their most comfortable programming language. I do think regardless of AI we as teachers need to get better at teaching debugging skills, but the knowledge gaps are inevitable because there's just too much to know. In Python, for example, the LLM is going to spit out yields, async functions, try/finally, maybe even something like a while/else, or with recent training data, the walrus operator. I can't expect even a fraction of 3rd year students who have worked with Python since their first year to know about all these things, and based on how students approach projects where they have studied all the relevant constructs but have forgotten some, I'm not optimistic seeing these things will magically become learning opportunities. Student projects are better off working with a limited subset of full programming languages that the students have actually learned, and using AI coding assistants as currently designed makes this impossible. Beyond that, even when the "assistant" just introduces bugs using syntax the students understand, even through their 4th year many students struggle to understand the operation of moderately complex code they've written themselves, let alone written by someone else. Having access to an AI that will confidently offer incorrect explanations for bugs will make this worse.
To be sure a small minority of students will be able to overcome these problems, but that minority is the group that has a good grasp of the fundamentals and has broadened their knowledge through self-study, which earlier AI-reliant classes would make less likely to happen. In any case, I care about the average student, since we already have plenty of stuff about our institutions that makes life easier for a favored few while being worse for the average student (note that our construction of that favored few as the "good" students is a large part of this problem).
To summarize: because AI assistants introduce excess code complexity and difficult-to-debug bugs, they'll slow down rather than speed up project progress for the average student on moderately complex projects. On a fixed deadline, they'll result in worse projects, or necessitate less ambitious project scoping to ensure adequate completion, and I expect this remains broadly true through 4-6 years of study in most programs (don't take this as an endorsement of AI "assistants" for masters students; we've ignored a lot of other problems along the way).
There's a related problem: solving open-ended project assignments well ultimately depends on deeply understanding the problem, and AI "assistants" allow students to put a lot of code in their file without spending much time thinking about the problem or building an understanding of it. This is awful for learning outcomes, but also bad for project success. Getting students to see the value of thinking deeply about a problem is a thorny pedagogical puzzle at the best of times, and allowing the use of AI "assistants" makes the problem much much worse. This is another area I hope to see (or even drive) pedagogical improvement in, for what it's worth.
1/2

@arXiv_physicsgeoph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-15 08:36:12

A comparative study of data- and image- domain LSRTM under velocity-impedance parametrization
Pengliang Yang, Zhengyu Ji
arxiv.org/abs/2508.10405

@arXiv_qbioMN_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-05-16 09:20:48

This arxiv.org/abs/2503.09605 has been replaced.
initial toot: mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_qbi…

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-14 07:33:42

EvoCurr: Self-evolving Curriculum with Behavior Code Generation for Complex Decision-making
Yang Cheng, Zilai Wang, Weiyu Ma, Wenhui Zhu, Yue Deng, Jian Zhao
arxiv.org/abs/2508.09586

@arXiv_csRO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-12 11:29:33

Triple-S: A Collaborative Multi-LLM Framework for Solving Long-Horizon Implicative Tasks in Robotics
Zixi Jia, Hongbin Gao, Fashe Li, Jiqiang Liu, Hexiao Li, Qinghua Liu
arxiv.org/abs/2508.07421

@arXiv_csGR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-11 07:36:03

Solving partial differential equations in participating media
Bailey Miller, Rohan Sawhney, Keenan Crane, Ioannis Gkioulekas
arxiv.org/abs/2506.08237

@arXiv_csDS_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-16 09:00:31

Efficient Branch-and-Bound for Submodular Function Maximization under Knapsack Constraint
Yimin Hao, Yi Zhou, Chao Xu, Zhang-Hua Fu
arxiv.org/abs/2507.11107

@arXiv_csNE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-12 09:05:33

Enhancing Decision Space Diversity in Multi-Objective Evolutionary Optimization for the Diet Problem
Gustavo V. Nascimento, Ivan R. Meneghini, Val\'eria Santos, Eduardo Luz, Gladston Moreira
arxiv.org/abs/2508.07077

@arXiv_csDM_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-10 07:40:31

The Integrality Gap of the Traveling Salesman Problem is $4/3$ if the LP Solution Has at Most $n 6$ Non-zero Components
Tullio Villa, Eleonora Vercesi, Janos Barta, Monaldo Mastrolilli
arxiv.org/abs/2507.07003

@arXiv_csCG_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-14 07:36:22

SHREC'25 Track on Multiple Relief Patterns: Report and Analysis
Gabriele Paolini, Claudio Tortorici, Stefano Berretti, Ahmed Hazem Youssef, Halim Benhabiles, Adnane Cabani, Ruiwen He, Karim Hammoudi, Iyyakutti Iyappan Ganapathi, Syed Sadaf Ali, Divya Velayudhan, Maregu Assefa, Naoufel Werghi
arxiv.org/abs/2508.09909

@arXiv_quantph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-13 10:00:52

Constrained free energy minimization for the design of thermal states and stabilizer thermodynamic systems
Michele Minervini, Madison Chin, Jacob Kupperman, Nana Liu, Ivy Luo, Meghan Ly, Soorya Rethinasamy, Kathie Wang, Mark M. Wilde
arxiv.org/abs/2508.09103

@arXiv_csMA_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-14 08:36:22

AgentsNet: Coordination and Collaborative Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLMs
Florian Gr\"otschla, Luis M\"uller, Jan T\"onshoff, Mikhail Galkin, Bryan Perozzi
arxiv.org/abs/2507.08616

@sean@scoat.es
2025-08-04 14:20:57

For many of the days of my career, the most important task I’ve had was to say “no”.
It’s really more like “No, not that way, but let’s find a solution.”
Saying “yes, here’s some code to do the thing you asked, even though you should DEFINITELY not be doing that thing because it’s dangerous for you and your users” is how someone (or some machine) who is not [yet] good at this job acts.

@arXiv_csDC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-13 07:37:00

GPU-Accelerated Distributed QAOA on Large-scale HPC Ecosystems
Zhihao Xu, Srikar Chundury, Seongmin Kim, Amir Shehata, Xinyi Li, Ang Li, Tengfei Luo, Frank Mueller, In-Saeng Suh
arxiv.org/abs/2506.10531

@arXiv_mathNA_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-12 09:52:13

Weighted and unweighted enrichment strategies for solving the Poisson problem with Dirichlet boundary conditions
Francesco Dell'Accio, Luca Desiderio, Allal Guessab, Federico Nudo
arxiv.org/abs/2508.07238

@arXiv_physicsedph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-14 08:37:12

Evaluation of a deliberate-practice informed supplemental intervention in graduate Quantum Mechanics
Michael E. Robbins, Guillaume M. Laurent, Eric W. Burkholder
arxiv.org/abs/2508.09917

@arXiv_csLG_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-14 09:13:22

Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Hard Nonlinear Equality and Inequality Constraints
Ashfaq Iftakher, Rahul Golder, M. M. Faruque Hasan
arxiv.org/abs/2507.08124 arxiv.org/pdf/2507.08124 arxiv.org/html/2507.08124
arXiv:2507.08124v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Traditional physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) do not guarantee strict constraint satisfaction. This is problematic in engineering systems where minor violations of governing laws can significantly degrade the reliability and consistency of model predictions. In this work, we develop KKT-Hardnet, a PINN architecture that enforces both linear and nonlinear equality and inequality constraints up to machine precision. It leverages a projection onto the feasible region through solving Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions of a distance minimization problem. Furthermore, we reformulate the nonlinear KKT conditions using log-exponential transformation to construct a general sparse system with only linear and exponential terms, thereby making the projection differentiable. We apply KKT-Hardnet on both test problems and a real-world chemical process simulation. Compared to multilayer perceptrons and PINNs, KKT-Hardnet achieves higher accuracy and strict constraint satisfaction. This approach allows the integration of domain knowledge into machine learning towards reliable hybrid modeling of complex systems.
toXiv_bot_toot

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-14 08:59:12

Mathematical Computation and Reasoning Errors by Large Language Models
Liang Zhang, Edith Aurora Graf
arxiv.org/abs/2508.09932 arxiv.org/pd…

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-16 08:38:19

Complexity of normalized stochastic first-order methods with momentum under heavy-tailed noise
Chuan He, Zhaosong Lu, Defeng Sun, Zhanwang Deng
arxiv.org/abs/2506.11214

@arXiv_csCE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-08 07:40:30

A Concept for Autonomous Problem-Solving in Intralogistics Scenarios
Johannes Sigel, Daniel Dittler, Nasser Jazdi, Michael Weyrich
arxiv.org/abs/2507.03534

@arXiv_csCY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-02 07:16:45

Exploring Societal Concerns and Perceptions of AI: A Thematic Analysis through the Lens of Problem-Seeking
Naomi Omeonga wa Kayembe
arxiv.org/abs/2505.23930

@v_i_o_l_a@openbiblio.social
2025-07-21 06:27:42

"The Art of Solving Impossible Problems" @ Katina Magazine: katinamagazine.org/content/art
"Sometimes the best way to solve a problem is by ad…

@arXiv_qbioNC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-12 16:49:49

Replaced article(s) found for q-bio.NC. arxiv.org/list/q-bio.NC/new
[1/1]:
- From Transformer to Biology: A Hierarchical Model for Attention in Complex Problem-Solving
Zhongqiao Lin, Yunwei Li, Tianming Yang

@eglassman@hci.social
2025-06-08 03:44:34

"Two final considerations include (1) the necessity of being both deliberate and strategic and (2) the importance of being flexible and even whimsical about your future."
journals.plos.org/plosbiology/

@arXiv_csCV_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-10 10:15:31

Learning Deliberately, Acting Intuitively: Unlocking Test-Time Reasoning in Multimodal LLMs
Yahan Yu, Yuyang Dong, Masafumi Oyamada
arxiv.org/abs/2507.06999

@kurtsh@mastodon.social
2025-08-08 00:32:18

Been using this for a while & it's excellent on providing accurate, thorough, fast but SAFE output... without needing use hardcore reasoning of o3-mini.
✅ Available today: GPT-5 in Microsoft 365 Copilot | Microsoft 365 Blog
microsoft.co…

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-08 09:11:22

Human-AI Schema Discovery and Application for Creative Problem Solving
Sitong Wang
arxiv.org/abs/2508.05045 arxiv.org/pdf/2508.05045

@arXiv_mathNA_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-12 08:25:31

An Introduction to Solving the Least-Squares Problem in Variational Data Assimilation
I. Dau\v{z}ickait\.e, M. A. Freitag, S. G\"urol, A. S. Lawless, A. Ramage, J. A. Scott, J. M. Tabeart
arxiv.org/abs/2506.09211

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-11 09:15:59

Study of Robust Features in Formulating Guidance for Heuristic Algorithms for Solving the Vehicle Routing Problem
Bachtiar Herdianto, Romain Billot, Flavien Lucas, Marc Sevaux
arxiv.org/abs/2508.06129

@arXiv_csPL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-10 07:56:52

Optimizing Optimizations: Case Study on Detecting Specific Types of Mathematical Optimization Constraints with E-Graphs in JijModeling
Hiromi Ishii (Jij, Inc), Taro Shimizu (Jij, Inc), Toshiki Teramura (Jij, Inc)
arxiv.org/abs/2506.06495

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-12 09:40:31

A matheuristic for solving the single row facility layout problem
Thomas Pammer, Markus Sinnl
arxiv.org/abs/2506.09793

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-01 10:21:31

Cascaded Information Disclosure for Generalized Evaluation of Problem Solving Capabilities
Yunxiang Yan, Tomohiro Sawada, Kartik Goyal
arxiv.org/abs/2507.23776

@HeidiSeibold@fosstodon.org
2025-07-18 14:06:06

Does using machine learning solve our problem of p-hacking and HARKing or do we have the same problems as with statistical tests and models?
digiresacademy.kit.com/posts/i

An elf pushing over the letter "P"
@arXiv_hepex_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-12 08:47:53

Experimental search for neutron-antineutron oscillation with use of ultra-cold neutrons revisited
Tatsushi Shima
arxiv.org/abs/2508.07525 a…

@arXiv_csLO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-03 07:22:30

Thinking Out of the Box: Hybrid SAT Solving by Unconstrained Continuous Optimization
Zhiwei Zhang, Samy Wu Fung, Anastasios Kyrillidis, Stanley Osher, Moshe Y. Vardi
arxiv.org/abs/2506.00674

@arXiv_csIT_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-10 07:43:52

Polarized Element-pair Code Based FFMA over a Gaussian Multiple-access Channel
Zhang-li-han Liu, Qi-yue Yu
arxiv.org/abs/2506.06796

@arXiv_mathAP_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-11 08:48:11

Forward and Inverse Problems for a Langevin-Type Fractional Equation Involving Non-Local Time Condition
Fayziev Yusuf, Jumaeva Shakhnoza
arxiv.org/abs/2507.07446

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-14 09:00:22

Warm-starting outer approximation for parametrized convex MINLP
Erik Tamm, Gabriele Eichfelder, Jan Kronqvist
arxiv.org/abs/2507.08595

@arXiv_physicssocph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-06 07:35:46

Bridging the Silos of Digitalization and Sustainability by Twin Transition: A Multivocal Literature Review
Baran Shajari, Istvan David
arxiv.org/abs/2506.04267

@arXiv_csRO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-04 07:51:03

Solving the Pod Repositioning Problem with Deep Reinforced Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search
Lin Xie, Hanyi Li
arxiv.org/abs/2506.02746

@arXiv_csLG_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-31 09:41:41

Multimodal Late Fusion Model for Problem-Solving Strategy Classification in a Machine Learning Game
Clemens Witt, Thiemo Leonhardt, Nadine Bergner, Mareen Grillenberger
arxiv.org/abs/2507.22426

@arXiv_mathph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-09 09:02:12

Mirror Symmetry of Spencer-Hodge Decompositions in Constrained Geometric Systems
Dongzhe Zheng
arxiv.org/abs/2506.05816

@arXiv_csDS_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-10 16:28:29

This arxiv.org/abs/2503.08262 has been replaced.
initial toot: mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_csDS_…

@arXiv_quantph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-30 10:12:51

Solving a real-world modular logistic scheduling problem with a quantum-classical metaheuristics
Florian Krellner, Abhishek Awasthi, Nico Kraus, Sarah Braun, Michael Poppel, Daniel Porawski
arxiv.org/abs/2507.21701

@arXiv_mathNA_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-13 08:43:20

Stability analysis of the free-surface Stokes problem and an unconditionally stable explicit scheme
Igor Tominec, Lukas Lundgren, Andr\'e L\"ofgren, Josefin Ahlkrona
arxiv.org/abs/2506.10447

@arXiv_csCY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-11 08:52:41

Structured Prompts, Better Outcomes? Exploring the Effects of a Structured Interface with ChatGPT in a Graduate Robotics Course
Jerome Brender, Laila El-Hamamsy, Kim Uittenhove, Francesco Mondada, Engin Bumbacher
arxiv.org/abs/2507.07767

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-04 09:07:21

An Exploration of Internal States in Collaborative Problem Solving
Sifatul Anindho, Videep Venkatesha, Mariah Bradford, Anne M. Cleary, Nathaniel Blanchard
arxiv.org/abs/2507.02229

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-08 12:57:41

GPU accelerated variant of Schroeppel-Shamir's algorithm for solving the market split problem
Nils-Christian Kempke, Thorsten Koch
arxiv.org/abs/2507.05045

@arXiv_mathNA_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-14 09:06:22

Computational algorithm for downward continuation of gravity anomalies
D. K. Ivanov, L. N. Temirbekova, P. N. Vabishchevich
arxiv.org/abs/2507.08506

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-11 10:08:11

PyVision: Agentic Vision with Dynamic Tooling
Shitian Zhao, Haoquan Zhang, Shaoheng Lin, Ming Li, Qilong Wu, Kaipeng Zhang, Chen Wei
arxiv.org/abs/2507.07998

@arXiv_mathNT_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-03 07:34:49

Determining unit groups and $\mathrm{K}_1$ of finite rings
Tommy Hofmann
arxiv.org/abs/2506.00266 arxiv.org/pdf/2506.…

@arXiv_csLO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-30 08:39:32

A Tree-Shaped Tableau for Checking the Satisfiability of Signal Temporal Logic with Bounded Temporal Operators
Beatrice Melani (Politecnico di Milano), Ezio Bartocci (TU Wien), Michele Chiari (TU Wien)
arxiv.org/abs/2507.21598

@arXiv_csNE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-30 07:35:29

An Effective Two-Phase Genetic Algorithm for Solving the Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem (RCPSP)
D. Sun, S. Zhou
arxiv.org/abs/2506.21915

@arXiv_csDS_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-12 09:32:53

Simple Algorithms for Fully Dynamic Edge Connectivity
Yotam Kenneth-Mordoch, Robert Krauthgamer
arxiv.org/abs/2508.07783 arxiv.org/pdf/2508…

@arXiv_csDM_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-10 07:29:32

CNFs and DNFs with Exactly $k$ Solutions
L. Sunil Chandran, Rishikesh Gajjala, Kuldeep S. Meel
arxiv.org/abs/2506.07268

@arXiv_mathAP_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-01 11:19:33

A doubly nonlinear elliptic problem with variable exponents, homogeneous Neumann conditions and generalized logistic source
Bogdan Maxim
arxiv.org/abs/2506.23660

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-12 11:12:33

Phoenix: A Novel Context-Aware Voice-Powered Math Equation Workspace and Editor
Kenneth Ge, Ryan Paul, Priscilla Zhang, JooYoung Seo
arxiv.org/abs/2508.07576

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-06 09:32:40

Collab-Solver: Collaborative Solving Policy Learning for Mixed-Integer Linear Programming
Siyuan Li, Yifan Yu, Yanchen Deng, Zhihao Zhang, Mengjing Chen, Fangzhou Zhu, Tao Zhong, Jianye Hao, Peng Liu, Bo An
arxiv.org/abs/2508.03030

@arXiv_quantph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-05 11:52:11

Designing lattice proteins with variational quantum algorithms
Hanna Linn, Lucas Knuthson, Anders Irb\"ack, Sandipan Mohanty, Laura Garc\'ia-\'Alvarez, G\"oran Johansson
arxiv.org/abs/2508.02369

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-06 07:26:38

On Solving the Assignment Problem with Conflicts
Roberto Montemanni, Derek H. Smith
arxiv.org/abs/2506.04274 arxiv.or…

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-11 09:32:29

GeoLaux: A Benchmark for Evaluating MLLMs' Geometry Performance on Long-Step Problems Requiring Auxiliary Lines
Yumeng Fu, Jiayin Zhu, Lingling Zhang, Bo Zhao, Shaoxuan Ma, Yushun Zhang, Yanrui Wu, Wenjun Wu
arxiv.org/abs/2508.06226

@arXiv_csNE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-10 07:59:42

CR-BLEA: Contrastive Ranking for Adaptive Resource Allocation in Bilevel Evolutionary Algorithms
Dejun Xu, Jijia Chen, Gary G. Yen, Min Jiang
arxiv.org/abs/2506.06362

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-09 08:11:42

MultiObjectiveAlgorithms.jl: a Julia package for solving multi-objective optimization problems
Oscar Dowson, Xavier Gandibleux, G\"okhan Kof
arxiv.org/abs/2507.05501

@arXiv_csCY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-08 09:31:20

MateInfoUB: A Real-World Benchmark for Testing LLMs in Competitive, Multilingual, and Multimodal Educational Tasks
Dumitran Adrian Marius, Theodor-Pierre Moroianu, Buca Mihnea-Vicentiu
arxiv.org/abs/2507.03162

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-25 07:39:12

Exploring Communication Strategies for Collaborative LLM Agents in Mathematical Problem-Solving
Liang Zhang, Xiaoming Zhai, Jionghao Lin, Jionghao Lin, Jennifer Kleiman, Diego Zapata-Rivera, Carol Forsyth, Yang Jiang, Xiangen Hu, Arthur C. Graesser
arxiv.org/abs/2507.17753

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-12 09:22:13

Learning to control inexact Benders decomposition via reinforcement learning
Zhe Li, Bernard T. Agyeman, Ilias Mitrai, Prodromos Daoutidis
arxiv.org/abs/2508.06700

@arXiv_mathNA_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-11 09:32:59

Heterogeneous optimized Schwarz Methods for heat conduction in composites with thermal contact resistance
Huan Zhang, Hui Zhang, Yan Wang, Yingxiang Xu
arxiv.org/abs/2508.06408

@arXiv_quantph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-30 10:19:11

A Grover-Based Quantum Algorithm for Solving Perfect Mazes via Fitness-Guided Search
Michelle L. Wu
arxiv.org/abs/2507.21937 arxiv.org/pdf/…

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-13 09:25:40

Bregman proximal gradient method for linear optimization under entropic constraints
Luis M. Brice\~no-Arias, Ma\"el Le Treust
arxiv.org/abs/2506.10849

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-03 07:18:25

Evaluation of LLMs for mathematical problem solving
Ruonan Wang, Runxi Wang, Yunwen Shen, Chengfeng Wu, Qinglin Zhou, Rohitash Chandra
arxiv.org/abs/2506.00309

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-06 09:42:30

RCP-Merging: Merging Long Chain-of-Thought Models with Domain-Specific Models by Considering Reasoning Capability as Prior
Junyao Yang, Jianwei Wang, Huiping Zhuang, Cen Chen, Ziqian Zeng
arxiv.org/abs/2508.03140

@arXiv_mathNA_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-12 08:29:21

A discontinuous Galerkin plane wave neural network method for Helmholtz equation and Maxwell's equations
Long Yuan, Menghui Wu, Qiya Hu
arxiv.org/abs/2506.09309

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-10 17:24:19

This arxiv.org/abs/2410.08850 has been replaced.
initial toot: mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_mat…

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-08 12:28:30

Dude, where's my utterance? Evaluating the effects of automatic segmentation and transcription on CPS detection
Videep Venkatesha, Mariah Bradford, Nathaniel Blanchard
arxiv.org/abs/2507.04454

@arXiv_mathNA_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-06 07:26:25

Efficient randomized algorithms for the fixed Tucker-rank problem of Tucker decomposition with adaptive shifts
Maolin Che, Yimin Wei, Chong Wu, Hong Yan
arxiv.org/abs/2506.04840

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-06 09:54:50

ToolVQA: A Dataset for Multi-step Reasoning VQA with External Tools
Shaofeng Yin, Ting Lei, Yang Liu
arxiv.org/abs/2508.03284 arxiv.org/pdf…

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-09 08:45:22

A derivative-free regularization algorithm for equality constrained nonlinear least squares problems
Xi Chen, Jinyan Fan
arxiv.org/abs/2507.05623

@arXiv_mathNA_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-29 10:51:21

A fixed-time stable dynamical model for solving EVLCPs
Yufei Wei, Shiping Lin, Cairong Chen, Dongmei Yu, Deren Han
arxiv.org/abs/2507.20652

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-10 17:17:09

This arxiv.org/abs/2312.00272 has been replaced.
initial toot: mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_mat…

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-11 10:05:45

An Efficient Augmented Lagrangian Method for Dynamic Optimal Transport on Surfaces Based on Second-Order Cone Programming
Liang Chen, Youyicun Lin, Yuxuan Zhou
arxiv.org/abs/2506.08988

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-08 09:12:22

Computing stabilizing feedback gains for stochastic linear systems via policy iteration method
Xinpei Zhang, Guangyan Jia
arxiv.org/abs/2508.05214

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-06 07:27:20

Was Residual Penalty and Neural Operators All We Needed for Solving Optimal Control Problems?
Oliver G. S. Lundqvist, Fabricio Oliveira
arxiv.org/abs/2506.04742

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-01 08:27:11

On the Complexity of Finding Stationary Points in Nonconvex Simple Bilevel Optimization
Jincheng Cao, Ruichen Jiang, Erfan Yazdandoost Hamedani, Aryan Mokhtari
arxiv.org/abs/2507.23155

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-02 07:27:40

Convex Approximations of Random Constrained Markov Decision Processes
V Varagapriya, Vikas Vikram Singh, Abdel Lisser
arxiv.org/abs/2505.24815

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-24 08:10:19

The Generalized Matrix Separation Problem: Algorithms
Xuemei Chen, Owen Deen
arxiv.org/abs/2507.17069 arxiv.org/pdf/2507.17069

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-30 09:31:00

Regularized Extragradient Methods for Solving Equilibrium Problems on Hadamard Manifolds
Shikher Sharmaa, Pankaj Gautam, Simeon Reich
arxiv.org/abs/2506.22391

@arXiv_mathOC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-04 13:53:36

This arxiv.org/abs/2411.13111 has been replaced.
initial toot: mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_mat…