
2025-07-16 09:39:11
Solving Integrated Periodic Railway Timetabling with Satisfiability Modulo Theories: A Scalable Approach to Routing and Vehicle Circulation
Florian Fuchs, Bernardo Martin-Iradi, Francesco Corman
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11489
Solving Integrated Periodic Railway Timetabling with Satisfiability Modulo Theories: A Scalable Approach to Routing and Vehicle Circulation
Florian Fuchs, Bernardo Martin-Iradi, Francesco Corman
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11489
Solving Linear Programs with Differential Privacy
Alina Ene, Huy Le Nguyen, Ta Duy Nguyen, Adrian Vladu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10946 https://
AWorld: Dynamic Multi-Agent System with Stable Maneuvering for Robust GAIA Problem Solving
Zhitian Xie, Qintong Wu, Chengyue Yu, Chenyi Zhuang, Jinjie Gu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09889
Solving Distance-Based Optimization Problems Using Optical Hardware
Guangyao Li, Richard Zhipeng Wang, Natalia G. Berloff
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11378 …
Error Analysis of Truncation Legendre Method for Solving Numerical Differentiation
Maksym Kyselov
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11529 https://
Solving the Decision Principal Ideal Problem with Pre-processing
Jincheng Zhuang, Qi Cheng
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09605 https://a…
Reasoning Strategies in Large Language Models: Can They Follow, Prefer, and Optimize?
Yanjian Zhang, Guillaume Wisniewski, Nadi Tomeh, Thierry Charnois
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11423
Solving Inverse Problems in Stochastic Self-Organising Systems through Invariant Representations
Elias Najarro, Nicolas Bessone, Sebastian Risi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11796
Teaching Problem Solving in Undergraduate Physics Courses: An Endorsement for Deliberate Practice
Kelly Miller, Olivia Miller, Georgia Lawrence
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08133 …
When CP requires $\bar\theta=0$, not $\bar\theta=\pi$
Luca Vecchi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10680 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.10680…
Solving the Market Split Problem with Lattice Enumeration
Alfred Wassermann
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08702 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.08702
Solving Random Planted CSPs below the $n^{k/2}$ Threshold
Arpon Basu, Jun-Ting Hsieh, Andrew D. Lin, Peter Manohar
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10833 https:/…
Metacognition and self-regulated learning in manipulative robotic problem-solving task
Margarida Romero (UniCA, UIC, LINE), George Kalmpourtzis
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.05112 …
Should we teach vibe coding? Here's why not.
Should AI coding be taught in undergrad CS education?
1/2
I teach undergraduate computer science labs, including for intro and more-advanced core courses. I don't publish (non-negligible) scholarly work in the area, but I've got years of craft expertise in course design, and I do follow the academic literature to some degree. In other words, In not the world's leading expert, but I have spent a lot of time thinking about course design, and consider myself competent at it, with plenty of direct experience in what knowledge & skills I can expect from students as they move through the curriculum.
I'm also strongly against most uses of what's called "AI" these days (specifically, generative deep neutral networks as supplied by our current cadre of techbro). There are a surprising number of completely orthogonal reasons to oppose the use of these systems, and a very limited number of reasonable exceptions (overcoming accessibility barriers is an example). On the grounds of environmental and digital-commons-pollution costs alone, using specifically the largest/newest models is unethical in most cases.
But as any good teacher should, I constantly question these evaluations, because I worry about the impact on my students should I eschew teaching relevant tech for bad reasons (and even for his reasons). I also want to make my reasoning clear to students, who should absolutely question me on this. That inspired me to ask a simple question: ignoring for one moment the ethical objections (which we shouldn't, of course; they're very stark), at what level in the CS major could I expect to teach a course about programming with AI assistance, and expect students to succeed at a more technically demanding final project than a course at the same level where students were banned from using AI? In other words, at what level would I expect students to actually benefit from AI coding "assistance?"
To be clear, I'm assuming that students aren't using AI in other aspects of coursework: the topic of using AI to "help you study" is a separate one (TL;DR it's gross value is not negative, but it's mostly not worth the harm to your metacognitive abilities, which AI-induced changes to the digital commons are making more important than ever).
So what's my answer to this question?
If I'm being incredibly optimistic, senior year. Slightly less optimistic, second year of a masters program. Realistic? Maybe never.
The interesting bit for you-the-reader is: why is this my answer? (Especially given that students would probably self-report significant gains at lower levels.) To start with, [this paper where experienced developers thought that AI assistance sped up their work on real tasks when in fact it slowed it down] (https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09089) is informative. There are a lot of differences in task between experienced devs solving real bugs and students working on a class project, but it's important to understand that we shouldn't have a baseline expectation that AI coding "assistants" will speed things up in the best of circumstances, and we shouldn't trust self-reports of productivity (or the AI hype machine in general).
Now we might imagine that coding assistants will be better at helping with a student project than at helping with fixing bugs in open-source software, since it's a much easier task. For many programming assignments that have a fixed answer, we know that many AI assistants can just spit out a solution based on prompting them with the problem description (there's another elephant in the room here to do with learning outcomes regardless of project success, but we'll ignore this over too, my focus here is on project complexity reach, not learning outcomes). My question is about more open-ended projects, not assignments with an expected answer. Here's a second study (by one of my colleagues) about novices using AI assistance for programming tasks. It showcases how difficult it is to use AI tools well, and some of these stumbling blocks that novices in particular face.
But what about intermediate students? Might there be some level where the AI is helpful because the task is still relatively simple and the students are good enough to handle it? The problem with this is that as task complexity increases, so does the likelihood of the AI generating (or copying) code that uses more complex constructs which a student doesn't understand. Let's say I have second year students writing interactive websites with JavaScript. Without a lot of care that those students don't know how to deploy, the AI is likely to suggest code that depends on several different frameworks, from React to JQuery, without actually setting up or including those frameworks, and of course three students would be way out of their depth trying to do that. This is a general problem: each programming class carefully limits the specific code frameworks and constructs it expects students to know based on the material it covers. There is no feasible way to limit an AI assistant to a fixed set of constructs or frameworks, using current designs. There are alternate designs where this would be possible (like AI search through adaptation from a controlled library of snippets) but those would be entirely different tools.
So what happens on a sizeable class project where the AI has dropped in buggy code, especially if it uses code constructs the students don't understand? Best case, they understand that they don't understand and re-prompt, or ask for help from an instructor or TA quickly who helps them get rid of the stuff they don't understand and re-prompt or manually add stuff they do. Average case: they waste several hours and/or sweep the bugs partly under the rug, resulting in a project with significant defects. Students in their second and even third years of a CS major still have a lot to learn about debugging, and usually have significant gaps in their knowledge of even their most comfortable programming language. I do think regardless of AI we as teachers need to get better at teaching debugging skills, but the knowledge gaps are inevitable because there's just too much to know. In Python, for example, the LLM is going to spit out yields, async functions, try/finally, maybe even something like a while/else, or with recent training data, the walrus operator. I can't expect even a fraction of 3rd year students who have worked with Python since their first year to know about all these things, and based on how students approach projects where they have studied all the relevant constructs but have forgotten some, I'm not optimistic seeing these things will magically become learning opportunities. Student projects are better off working with a limited subset of full programming languages that the students have actually learned, and using AI coding assistants as currently designed makes this impossible. Beyond that, even when the "assistant" just introduces bugs using syntax the students understand, even through their 4th year many students struggle to understand the operation of moderately complex code they've written themselves, let alone written by someone else. Having access to an AI that will confidently offer incorrect explanations for bugs will make this worse.
To be sure a small minority of students will be able to overcome these problems, but that minority is the group that has a good grasp of the fundamentals and has broadened their knowledge through self-study, which earlier AI-reliant classes would make less likely to happen. In any case, I care about the average student, since we already have plenty of stuff about our institutions that makes life easier for a favored few while being worse for the average student (note that our construction of that favored few as the "good" students is a large part of this problem).
To summarize: because AI assistants introduce excess code complexity and difficult-to-debug bugs, they'll slow down rather than speed up project progress for the average student on moderately complex projects. On a fixed deadline, they'll result in worse projects, or necessitate less ambitious project scoping to ensure adequate completion, and I expect this remains broadly true through 4-6 years of study in most programs (don't take this as an endorsement of AI "assistants" for masters students; we've ignored a lot of other problems along the way).
There's a related problem: solving open-ended project assignments well ultimately depends on deeply understanding the problem, and AI "assistants" allow students to put a lot of code in their file without spending much time thinking about the problem or building an understanding of it. This is awful for learning outcomes, but also bad for project success. Getting students to see the value of thinking deeply about a problem is a thorny pedagogical puzzle at the best of times, and allowing the use of AI "assistants" makes the problem much much worse. This is another area I hope to see (or even drive) pedagogical improvement in, for what it's worth.
1/2
A comparative study of data- and image- domain LSRTM under velocity-impedance parametrization
Pengliang Yang, Zhengyu Ji
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10405 https://
This https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.09605 has been replaced.
initial toot: https://mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_qbi…
EvoCurr: Self-evolving Curriculum with Behavior Code Generation for Complex Decision-making
Yang Cheng, Zilai Wang, Weiyu Ma, Wenhui Zhu, Yue Deng, Jian Zhao
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09586
Triple-S: A Collaborative Multi-LLM Framework for Solving Long-Horizon Implicative Tasks in Robotics
Zixi Jia, Hongbin Gao, Fashe Li, Jiqiang Liu, Hexiao Li, Qinghua Liu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07421
Solving partial differential equations in participating media
Bailey Miller, Rohan Sawhney, Keenan Crane, Ioannis Gkioulekas
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08237
Efficient Branch-and-Bound for Submodular Function Maximization under Knapsack Constraint
Yimin Hao, Yi Zhou, Chao Xu, Zhang-Hua Fu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11107
Enhancing Decision Space Diversity in Multi-Objective Evolutionary Optimization for the Diet Problem
Gustavo V. Nascimento, Ivan R. Meneghini, Val\'eria Santos, Eduardo Luz, Gladston Moreira
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07077
The Integrality Gap of the Traveling Salesman Problem is $4/3$ if the LP Solution Has at Most $n 6$ Non-zero Components
Tullio Villa, Eleonora Vercesi, Janos Barta, Monaldo Mastrolilli
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07003
SHREC'25 Track on Multiple Relief Patterns: Report and Analysis
Gabriele Paolini, Claudio Tortorici, Stefano Berretti, Ahmed Hazem Youssef, Halim Benhabiles, Adnane Cabani, Ruiwen He, Karim Hammoudi, Iyyakutti Iyappan Ganapathi, Syed Sadaf Ali, Divya Velayudhan, Maregu Assefa, Naoufel Werghi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09909
Constrained free energy minimization for the design of thermal states and stabilizer thermodynamic systems
Michele Minervini, Madison Chin, Jacob Kupperman, Nana Liu, Ivy Luo, Meghan Ly, Soorya Rethinasamy, Kathie Wang, Mark M. Wilde
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09103
AgentsNet: Coordination and Collaborative Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLMs
Florian Gr\"otschla, Luis M\"uller, Jan T\"onshoff, Mikhail Galkin, Bryan Perozzi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.08616
For many of the days of my career, the most important task I’ve had was to say “no”.
It’s really more like “No, not that way, but let’s find a solution.”
Saying “yes, here’s some code to do the thing you asked, even though you should DEFINITELY not be doing that thing because it’s dangerous for you and your users” is how someone (or some machine) who is not [yet] good at this job acts.
GPU-Accelerated Distributed QAOA on Large-scale HPC Ecosystems
Zhihao Xu, Srikar Chundury, Seongmin Kim, Amir Shehata, Xinyi Li, Ang Li, Tengfei Luo, Frank Mueller, In-Saeng Suh
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.10531
Weighted and unweighted enrichment strategies for solving the Poisson problem with Dirichlet boundary conditions
Francesco Dell'Accio, Luca Desiderio, Allal Guessab, Federico Nudo
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07238
Evaluation of a deliberate-practice informed supplemental intervention in graduate Quantum Mechanics
Michael E. Robbins, Guillaume M. Laurent, Eric W. Burkholder
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09917
Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Hard Nonlinear Equality and Inequality Constraints
Ashfaq Iftakher, Rahul Golder, M. M. Faruque Hasan
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.08124 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.08124 https://arxiv.org/html/2507.08124
arXiv:2507.08124v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Traditional physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) do not guarantee strict constraint satisfaction. This is problematic in engineering systems where minor violations of governing laws can significantly degrade the reliability and consistency of model predictions. In this work, we develop KKT-Hardnet, a PINN architecture that enforces both linear and nonlinear equality and inequality constraints up to machine precision. It leverages a projection onto the feasible region through solving Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions of a distance minimization problem. Furthermore, we reformulate the nonlinear KKT conditions using log-exponential transformation to construct a general sparse system with only linear and exponential terms, thereby making the projection differentiable. We apply KKT-Hardnet on both test problems and a real-world chemical process simulation. Compared to multilayer perceptrons and PINNs, KKT-Hardnet achieves higher accuracy and strict constraint satisfaction. This approach allows the integration of domain knowledge into machine learning towards reliable hybrid modeling of complex systems.
toXiv_bot_toot
Mathematical Computation and Reasoning Errors by Large Language Models
Liang Zhang, Edith Aurora Graf
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09932 https://arxiv.org/pd…
Complexity of normalized stochastic first-order methods with momentum under heavy-tailed noise
Chuan He, Zhaosong Lu, Defeng Sun, Zhanwang Deng
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11214
A Concept for Autonomous Problem-Solving in Intralogistics Scenarios
Johannes Sigel, Daniel Dittler, Nasser Jazdi, Michael Weyrich
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03534
Exploring Societal Concerns and Perceptions of AI: A Thematic Analysis through the Lens of Problem-Seeking
Naomi Omeonga wa Kayembe
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23930
"The Art of Solving Impossible Problems" @ Katina Magazine: https://katinamagazine.org/content/article/future-of-work/2025/the-art-of-solving-impossible-problems
"Sometimes the best way to solve a problem is by ad…
Replaced article(s) found for q-bio.NC. https://arxiv.org/list/q-bio.NC/new
[1/1]:
- From Transformer to Biology: A Hierarchical Model for Attention in Complex Problem-Solving
Zhongqiao Lin, Yunwei Li, Tianming Yang
"Two final considerations include (1) the necessity of being both deliberate and strategic and (2) the importance of being flexible and even whimsical about your future."
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.…
Learning Deliberately, Acting Intuitively: Unlocking Test-Time Reasoning in Multimodal LLMs
Yahan Yu, Yuyang Dong, Masafumi Oyamada
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06999
Been using this for a while & it's excellent on providing accurate, thorough, fast but SAFE output... without needing use hardcore reasoning of o3-mini.
✅ Available today: GPT-5 in Microsoft 365 Copilot | Microsoft 365 Blog
https://www.microsoft.co…
Human-AI Schema Discovery and Application for Creative Problem Solving
Sitong Wang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.05045 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.05045…
An Introduction to Solving the Least-Squares Problem in Variational Data Assimilation
I. Dau\v{z}ickait\.e, M. A. Freitag, S. G\"urol, A. S. Lawless, A. Ramage, J. A. Scott, J. M. Tabeart
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09211
Study of Robust Features in Formulating Guidance for Heuristic Algorithms for Solving the Vehicle Routing Problem
Bachtiar Herdianto, Romain Billot, Flavien Lucas, Marc Sevaux
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06129
Optimizing Optimizations: Case Study on Detecting Specific Types of Mathematical Optimization Constraints with E-Graphs in JijModeling
Hiromi Ishii (Jij, Inc), Taro Shimizu (Jij, Inc), Toshiki Teramura (Jij, Inc)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06495
A matheuristic for solving the single row facility layout problem
Thomas Pammer, Markus Sinnl
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09793 https://
Cascaded Information Disclosure for Generalized Evaluation of Problem Solving Capabilities
Yunxiang Yan, Tomohiro Sawada, Kartik Goyal
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23776 https://
Does using machine learning solve our problem of p-hacking and HARKing or do we have the same problems as with statistical tests and models?
https://digiresacademy.kit.com/posts/is-machine-learning-and-ai-solving-the-problem-of-p-hacking
Experimental search for neutron-antineutron oscillation with use of ultra-cold neutrons revisited
Tatsushi Shima
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07525 https://a…
Thinking Out of the Box: Hybrid SAT Solving by Unconstrained Continuous Optimization
Zhiwei Zhang, Samy Wu Fung, Anastasios Kyrillidis, Stanley Osher, Moshe Y. Vardi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00674
Polarized Element-pair Code Based FFMA over a Gaussian Multiple-access Channel
Zhang-li-han Liu, Qi-yue Yu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06796 https://…
Forward and Inverse Problems for a Langevin-Type Fractional Equation Involving Non-Local Time Condition
Fayziev Yusuf, Jumaeva Shakhnoza
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07446
Warm-starting outer approximation for parametrized convex MINLP
Erik Tamm, Gabriele Eichfelder, Jan Kronqvist
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.08595 https://
Bridging the Silos of Digitalization and Sustainability by Twin Transition: A Multivocal Literature Review
Baran Shajari, Istvan David
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04267
Solving the Pod Repositioning Problem with Deep Reinforced Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search
Lin Xie, Hanyi Li
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.02746 https://…
Multimodal Late Fusion Model for Problem-Solving Strategy Classification in a Machine Learning Game
Clemens Witt, Thiemo Leonhardt, Nadine Bergner, Mareen Grillenberger
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22426
Mirror Symmetry of Spencer-Hodge Decompositions in Constrained Geometric Systems
Dongzhe Zheng
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05816 https://
This https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08262 has been replaced.
initial toot: https://mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_csDS_…
Solving a real-world modular logistic scheduling problem with a quantum-classical metaheuristics
Florian Krellner, Abhishek Awasthi, Nico Kraus, Sarah Braun, Michael Poppel, Daniel Porawski
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21701
Stability analysis of the free-surface Stokes problem and an unconditionally stable explicit scheme
Igor Tominec, Lukas Lundgren, Andr\'e L\"ofgren, Josefin Ahlkrona
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.10447
Structured Prompts, Better Outcomes? Exploring the Effects of a Structured Interface with ChatGPT in a Graduate Robotics Course
Jerome Brender, Laila El-Hamamsy, Kim Uittenhove, Francesco Mondada, Engin Bumbacher
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07767
An Exploration of Internal States in Collaborative Problem Solving
Sifatul Anindho, Videep Venkatesha, Mariah Bradford, Anne M. Cleary, Nathaniel Blanchard
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.02229
GPU accelerated variant of Schroeppel-Shamir's algorithm for solving the market split problem
Nils-Christian Kempke, Thorsten Koch
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05045
Computational algorithm for downward continuation of gravity anomalies
D. K. Ivanov, L. N. Temirbekova, P. N. Vabishchevich
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.08506
PyVision: Agentic Vision with Dynamic Tooling
Shitian Zhao, Haoquan Zhang, Shaoheng Lin, Ming Li, Qilong Wu, Kaipeng Zhang, Chen Wei
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07998
Determining unit groups and $\mathrm{K}_1$ of finite rings
Tommy Hofmann
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00266 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.…
A Tree-Shaped Tableau for Checking the Satisfiability of Signal Temporal Logic with Bounded Temporal Operators
Beatrice Melani (Politecnico di Milano), Ezio Bartocci (TU Wien), Michele Chiari (TU Wien)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21598
An Effective Two-Phase Genetic Algorithm for Solving the Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem (RCPSP)
D. Sun, S. Zhou
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.21915
Simple Algorithms for Fully Dynamic Edge Connectivity
Yotam Kenneth-Mordoch, Robert Krauthgamer
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07783 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508…
CNFs and DNFs with Exactly $k$ Solutions
L. Sunil Chandran, Rishikesh Gajjala, Kuldeep S. Meel
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07268 https://
A doubly nonlinear elliptic problem with variable exponents, homogeneous Neumann conditions and generalized logistic source
Bogdan Maxim
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.23660
Phoenix: A Novel Context-Aware Voice-Powered Math Equation Workspace and Editor
Kenneth Ge, Ryan Paul, Priscilla Zhang, JooYoung Seo
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07576 https://
Collab-Solver: Collaborative Solving Policy Learning for Mixed-Integer Linear Programming
Siyuan Li, Yifan Yu, Yanchen Deng, Zhihao Zhang, Mengjing Chen, Fangzhou Zhu, Tao Zhong, Jianye Hao, Peng Liu, Bo An
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03030
Designing lattice proteins with variational quantum algorithms
Hanna Linn, Lucas Knuthson, Anders Irb\"ack, Sandipan Mohanty, Laura Garc\'ia-\'Alvarez, G\"oran Johansson
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02369
On Solving the Assignment Problem with Conflicts
Roberto Montemanni, Derek H. Smith
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04274 https://arxiv.or…
GeoLaux: A Benchmark for Evaluating MLLMs' Geometry Performance on Long-Step Problems Requiring Auxiliary Lines
Yumeng Fu, Jiayin Zhu, Lingling Zhang, Bo Zhao, Shaoxuan Ma, Yushun Zhang, Yanrui Wu, Wenjun Wu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06226
CR-BLEA: Contrastive Ranking for Adaptive Resource Allocation in Bilevel Evolutionary Algorithms
Dejun Xu, Jijia Chen, Gary G. Yen, Min Jiang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06362
MultiObjectiveAlgorithms.jl: a Julia package for solving multi-objective optimization problems
Oscar Dowson, Xavier Gandibleux, G\"okhan Kof
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05501 …
MateInfoUB: A Real-World Benchmark for Testing LLMs in Competitive, Multilingual, and Multimodal Educational Tasks
Dumitran Adrian Marius, Theodor-Pierre Moroianu, Buca Mihnea-Vicentiu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03162
Exploring Communication Strategies for Collaborative LLM Agents in Mathematical Problem-Solving
Liang Zhang, Xiaoming Zhai, Jionghao Lin, Jionghao Lin, Jennifer Kleiman, Diego Zapata-Rivera, Carol Forsyth, Yang Jiang, Xiangen Hu, Arthur C. Graesser
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17753
Learning to control inexact Benders decomposition via reinforcement learning
Zhe Li, Bernard T. Agyeman, Ilias Mitrai, Prodromos Daoutidis
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06700 https…
Heterogeneous optimized Schwarz Methods for heat conduction in composites with thermal contact resistance
Huan Zhang, Hui Zhang, Yan Wang, Yingxiang Xu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06408
A Grover-Based Quantum Algorithm for Solving Perfect Mazes via Fitness-Guided Search
Michelle L. Wu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21937 https://arxiv.org/pdf/…
Bregman proximal gradient method for linear optimization under entropic constraints
Luis M. Brice\~no-Arias, Ma\"el Le Treust
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.10849
Evaluation of LLMs for mathematical problem solving
Ruonan Wang, Runxi Wang, Yunwen Shen, Chengfeng Wu, Qinglin Zhou, Rohitash Chandra
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00309
RCP-Merging: Merging Long Chain-of-Thought Models with Domain-Specific Models by Considering Reasoning Capability as Prior
Junyao Yang, Jianwei Wang, Huiping Zhuang, Cen Chen, Ziqian Zeng
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03140
A discontinuous Galerkin plane wave neural network method for Helmholtz equation and Maxwell's equations
Long Yuan, Menghui Wu, Qiya Hu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09309
This https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.08850 has been replaced.
initial toot: https://mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_mat…
Dude, where's my utterance? Evaluating the effects of automatic segmentation and transcription on CPS detection
Videep Venkatesha, Mariah Bradford, Nathaniel Blanchard
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.04454
Efficient randomized algorithms for the fixed Tucker-rank problem of Tucker decomposition with adaptive shifts
Maolin Che, Yimin Wei, Chong Wu, Hong Yan
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04840
ToolVQA: A Dataset for Multi-step Reasoning VQA with External Tools
Shaofeng Yin, Ting Lei, Yang Liu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03284 https://arxiv.org/pdf…
A derivative-free regularization algorithm for equality constrained nonlinear least squares problems
Xi Chen, Jinyan Fan
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05623 h…
A fixed-time stable dynamical model for solving EVLCPs
Yufei Wei, Shiping Lin, Cairong Chen, Dongmei Yu, Deren Han
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.20652 https://
This https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.00272 has been replaced.
initial toot: https://mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_mat…
An Efficient Augmented Lagrangian Method for Dynamic Optimal Transport on Surfaces Based on Second-Order Cone Programming
Liang Chen, Youyicun Lin, Yuxuan Zhou
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08988
Computing stabilizing feedback gains for stochastic linear systems via policy iteration method
Xinpei Zhang, Guangyan Jia
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.05214 https://
Was Residual Penalty and Neural Operators All We Needed for Solving Optimal Control Problems?
Oliver G. S. Lundqvist, Fabricio Oliveira
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04742
On the Complexity of Finding Stationary Points in Nonconvex Simple Bilevel Optimization
Jincheng Cao, Ruichen Jiang, Erfan Yazdandoost Hamedani, Aryan Mokhtari
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23155
Convex Approximations of Random Constrained Markov Decision Processes
V Varagapriya, Vikas Vikram Singh, Abdel Lisser
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.24815 http…
The Generalized Matrix Separation Problem: Algorithms
Xuemei Chen, Owen Deen
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17069 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.17069
Regularized Extragradient Methods for Solving Equilibrium Problems on Hadamard Manifolds
Shikher Sharmaa, Pankaj Gautam, Simeon Reich
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22391
This https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.13111 has been replaced.
initial toot: https://mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_mat…