Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@jdrm@social.linux.pizza
2026-04-17 07:05:19

¿Quién dirigirš la nueva entrega de "El acorazado Potemkin", Spileberg? eu.usatoday.com/story/news/pol

@memeorandum@universeodon.com
2026-04-17 01:51:03

Cookies, deodorant, socks. Iran war puts military packages in limbo (Cybele Mayes-Osterman/USA Today)
usatoday.com/story/news/politi
memeorandum.com/260416/p134#a2

@nobodyinperson@fosstodon.org
2026-02-17 22:41:45

#InfCloud hasn't been updated for a decade, yikes. But apparently it's still the *only* available statically servable (i.e. no database / no PHP / whatever) #CalDAV #CardDAV web client out there. 😱

@usul@piaille.fr
2026-02-16 06:36:30

Thinking about using this to upgrade my system. Anyone using it ?
python3-dnf-plugin-torproxy - Fedora Packages
packages.fedoraproject.org/pkg

@kexpmusicbot@mastodonapp.uk
2026-02-16 21:01:51

🇺🇦 #NowPlaying on KEXP's #MiddayShow
Guerilla Toss:
🎵 Psychosis Is Just a Number
#GuerillaToss
guerillatoss.bandcamp.com/trac
open.spotify.com/track/2wjmsPB

The LHCb experiment at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has discovered a new particle consisting of two charm quarks and one down quark,
a similar structure to the familiar proton, but with two heavy charm quarks replacing the two up quarks of the proton -- thus quadrupling its mass.
The discovery, presented at the ongoing Moriond conference, will help physicists better understand how the strong force binds protons, neutrons and other composite particles together.
Quarks …

@kctipton@mas.to
2026-04-16 05:42:35

Physicists think they've resolved the proton size puzzle - Ars Technica arstechnica.com/science/2026/0

@arXiv_physicsaccph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2026-02-17 18:19:13

Replaced article(s) found for physics.acc-ph. arxiv.org/list/physics.acc-ph/
[1/1]:
- Classical and quantum beam dynamics simulation of the RF photoinjector test bench
Dyatlov, Kobets, Levichev, Maksimov, Nikiforov, Nozdrin, Popov, Sibiryakova, Yunenko, Karlovets
arxiv.org/abs/2509.00732 mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_physicsac
- First Experimental Demonstration of Beam Storage by Three-Dimensional Spiral Injection Scheme for...
Matsushita, Iinuma, Ohsawa, Nakayama, Furukawa, Ogawa, Saito, Mibe, Rehman
arxiv.org/abs/2602.01504 mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_physicsac
- Generation of high-OAM ultraviolet twisted light for RF-photoinjector applications
Dyatlov, Dolgintsev, Gerasimov, Kobets, Nazmov, Nozdrin, Sergeev, Shokin, Yunenko, Karlovets
arxiv.org/abs/2512.08442 mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_quantph_b
toXiv_bot_toot

@mgorny@social.treehouse.systems
2026-04-17 08:08:06

Kinda related to #Gentoo, so cool" or "they stopped using it, so sad". And I'm like, "why should we care?"
Do they donate money to Gentoo? They don't. And if they did, it would probably come with obligations making this not worth it.
Do they contribute back? Rarely, and if they do, they are unreliable. They benefit more than we do. They just want to dump the packages they need, quickly duct taped together, so that we would maintain them going forward. Their employees rarely reveal that they're paid to do this, and if they do, it's not so they'd be held to higher standards, but to emphasize their importance: "you must placate us."
Well, sometimes they hire Gentoo developers. It's nice that these developers get some gratification for their work, especially if they're able to continue contributing on work time. But in the end, company priorities win. We are either left with loads of new packages with no maintainer and unclear significance, or a Google employee who appeared every once in a while to dump a bunch of ChromeOS patches and never bothered handling the fallout.
So, sorry, but I'd rather care for volunteers who want to make Gentoo better, than companies who see some profit incentive in it.
PS. I'm probably focusing too much on the negative aspects, and we likely had some positive interactions that are far less known and usually don't meet with such fanfare.
#FreeSoftware

@thomasfuchs@hachyderm.io
2026-03-17 15:16:31

The only people worse at naming things than programmers are physicists, like what the fuck is Ξcc⁺ supposed to be