Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-03-03 10:26:42

The context is probably important too, and a bit more nuanced. The general actually wasn't playing as Iran but as a rebel faction that arose due to instability. You know, like how the US got ISIS after toppling Saddam? So like... not necessarily the Iranian regime but something much more challenging that comes after a major earthquake or, like... I don't know... the US kills the supreme leader and Iranian proxies create a decentralized network that threatens international trade.
Definitely unimaginable. Everything is definitely going to go well and exactly as simulated, definitely leading to a Blue force victory.
Yeah, I'm gonna get back to writing fiction and doing art, and ignoring this mess for the moment.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-03-03 10:15:00

tl;dr: A retired general payed as (an imaginary country that represented) Iran and kicked the shit out of the US military so badly that they changed the rules mid-game to make sure the US would win.
This was the most expensive war game ever, and they basically burned the results.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-03-03 10:12:39

In all seriousness, there are a ton of possible scenarios. The Iranian regime is weaker than it has ever been. I deeply hope for the liberation of Iranian people, especially oppressed minorities. Meanwhile, the US is lead by the most incompetent leadership ever (which is really saying a lot).
The Kurds, who could be the keystone ground forces needed to collapse the regime have been betrayed by the US so many times that they may not rise up (correctly) predicting that the US will stab them in the back at the fist chance.
But they are also a highly oppressed group in Iran, and may well take this opportunity. I don't know enough about this region to make any kind of reasonable prediction.
There are a huge number of unknowns, which is really *not* what anyone wants when starting a conflict.
To Iranian people, I wish you freedom and self-determination against all actors. To the US military, I wish you the best of luck getting your whole behive-dick situation.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-03-03 10:02:02

Anyone know about how MC02 came out? Probably not relevant right now. Everyone can probably just ignore this. Blue won in the end, so no potential for foreshadowing at all...
#USPol #Iran

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-03-03 09:50:44

Interesting for Euro #Ham operators:
iz0kba.it/en/iranian-number-st

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-03-04 08:28:10

I especially like the essay "Farming regurgitated dogshit for fun and profit: Deepseek and other tools," but my favorite is "Making Google AI Barf dogshit for Imaginary Internet Points."
While neither essay exists, Google provides an excellent summary of both.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-03-04 07:55:33

Using LLMs to create the illusion of productivity and other essays I will pretend to write: an anthology

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-04 10:08:04

The interview, for reference
iheart.com/podcast/105-it-coul

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-04 10:06:18

I've seen folks boost an interview about this book. I'm really excited to see it come out, and definitely adding it to my reading list.
akpress.org/to-catch-a-fascist

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-04 16:38:27

#DearLazyWeb: A while back someone posted a screen cap of Google getting confused between Voyager's "The Doctor" and "Doctor Who."
I'm writing something up about LLMs and I'd really like to reference it. I'm gonna go through my boosts and hope I can find it, but could anyone with it handy save me a few hours of data spelunking?
Edit: @… found it. Awesome. lol!

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-01-04 22:30:44

Colonial nations didn't stop colonialism because they became moral. They stopped because it was untenable. The advancement of asymmetric warfare made it impossible to maintain colonial holdings and those empires crumbled.
The answer was neoliberalism and soft power. Trump had annihilated the financial systems that held that fragile order in place.
#Venezuela will probably end up trying to teach Trump the lesson everyone else learned in the 20th century, but since he's incapable of learning it may very well teach him the lesson Afghanistan taught the USSR.
We'll see how it goes.
It's still possible that we could end up with the US interfering so much that the only people left able to defend space are anarchists. South and Central America actually has some really interesting and advanced anarchist tendencies, so fucking with that could absolutely blow up in Trump (and every other authoritarian's) face.
I hope that the Venezuelan people can take advantage of the situation to get rid of both a shitty dictator and the shitty colonizers who want to replace him.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-01-04 21:31:20

It's also probably worth bumping this post again:
infosec.exchange/@tinker/11583
I boosted the parent yesterday, but it's worth visiting again.
We are not powerless. There are things we can do. We don't have to shut down the whole thing all at once right now to make a positive change, but we do have to shut the whole thing down soon if we're going to survive.
Every act of resistance is important, no matter how small. We have lots of strategies, and we should support as many of them as possible.

@kexpmusicbot@mastodonapp.uk
2025-12-30 02:44:13

🇺🇦 #NowPlaying on KEXP's #DriveTime
Credit Electric:
🎵 HEX
#CreditElectric
creditelectric.bandcamp.com/tr
open.spotify.com/track/4aPjgDh

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-01-04 21:28:47

It's probably worth bumping blackoutthesystem.com/ again. There are some interesting resources on that site. I was impressed with their mutual aid section.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-01-04 20:59:42

The only way out of this mess is to exit this system. Economic pressure can lead to small adjustments. That can absolutely help. It can make things marginally better. Economic strikes have, thus far, proved to be some of the most effective in US history.
A general strike is the ultimate blow, but organizing something like that is hard. Don't wait for it. Do something now. And there are a *lot* of options between here and there.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-01-04 20:55:34

There's actually a lot we don't talk about related to cars and the military industrial complex. My point that internal combustion engines align the citizens and the military (by forcing citizens to rely on the critical resource at the center or the military industrial complex) remains evergreen. But people also generally don't realize that the manufacturing infrastructure of cars is fungible, and can be shifted to aircraft and tanks when needed.
Car manufacturing capabilities are intimately related to militarism in a way that bicycles aren't. That's also worth thinking about.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-01-04 20:50:01

Oil is the absolute enemy, and that should be completely clear at this point. Advocate hard for a Dutch style traffic plan and Dutch bike infrastructure. Push hard for mass transit. Fight car infrastructure with everything you can. Abolish free parking.
Every dollar you spend on gas, every dollar that goes to roads and free parking, is a dollar that will be spent murdering civilians to steal their oil.
Free parking is the most important subsidy to car culture. The more expensive you can make parking, the fewer cars will be on the road, the safer cities will be, and the less money will be available for the gang of thieves directing the military.
#FuckCars

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-01-04 20:45:52

RE: #Venezuela #USPol

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-02 10:01:00

Maybe some single payer healthcare? Ffs...

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-02 09:59:41

I'm not saying there isn't any problem, but I am saying that thatcherism/reaganism is absolutely how everyone dies. How about we stop American private equity from draining the economy, ignore all US laws against reverse engineering, stop paying copy levy to the US, and legalize squatting again to make it so giant corporations can't hold all the housing stock? Maybe we can check in after that.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-02 09:56:28

He doesn't even challenge the "we should save the economy with AI" bullshit. Like... Why not magic beans? No one who proposes AI or looks at the US or China as models should ever be taken seriously.
youtube.com/watch?v=56qKx6Y5LBU

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-02 09:54:29

Video I was watching: "members and representatives of the ultra wealthy have created a report that points out the obvious fact that infinite growth has to end because the world is finite. They have assured us that this is bad for us because it's bad for "the economy." But there's hope. If we only take several steps towards fascism, we will only need to take the remaining steps in order to sustain their economic dominance for a little while more.
It will only cost everything we care about and the habitability of the planet, but some of us can still benefit from the crumbs they will feed us until they have to systematically murder us all for just a little more time on top."

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-02 12:22:28

I'm especially frustrated because I feel like Hoog has some good content and is apathetically nice.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-01-02 10:02:40

#BurnDownTheDatacenters
CW: Video references non-specific AI generated CSAM and fash propaganda
youtu.be/YJGv6jkPZGY

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-03-01 12:48:21

Just finished this...
hexmhell.writeas.com/the-fear
I've been working on a set of myths and folklore that exist within the context of a fantasy story I'm working on. This is one of them.
Feedback is always welcome, especially grammar and typos. Now back to editing a couple of other projects I've been working on.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-03-01 20:26:11

I joined a writers group a little while ago, and it's been super helpful. I've gotten some really great constructive feedback. I'm re-publishing a story I published earlier and have edited based on that feedback, so here it is:
hexmhell.writeas.com/on-the-ec

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-01-01 17:05:16

#2025inasongorpoem
America
All of your enemies
Come from within
But you lash out so
It is seen
Like some frightened child
In an angry world
Or the fall of Rome
Your demise comes
From your own hands
- Track 11 on The Offspring's self-titled album, released in 1989 replaced in 2001 with 3:22 of silence.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-28 18:14:09

If you're stuck in a doom loop, stop here for a moment.
Doom scrolling to see the exact moment we're all gonna die in nuclear hellfire isn't a good use of time. Choose something with longer term impact and focus on that. If we all die, you won't know the difference. If we live, you won't have wasted your time doom scrolling.
Good luck. I hope you do something cool.
#Iran

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-28 17:53:47
Content warning: Mention of sexual violence against children

RE: mstdn.social/@mcnado/116148732
Boost with CW

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-28 11:01:31

And like.... I get it. I know these folks are terrible. But if you still have any of these people in your life, there is a level of privilege generally associated with that. Everyone who doesn't have the privilege needs you to use it now to help ease the boot on their neck.
Every crack in this system is important, even if it's just one more person who is out.
"When your ready enemy is strong, divide them. When your enemy is weak, attack them."
We're still in that "dividing" phase, and providing a path for folks to leave the cult undermines the power of the cult. The more people who leave, the faster they leave, the faster it unravels. If you hate Trump, and you still can talk to any of his supporters, now is the time to stop gloating and pointing out how stupid they are and to instead give them a way to leave. Most of them don't actually want to be defending a demented pedophile, so please help them stop doing that.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-28 10:49:25

This really belongs on blue sky but I just don't have the patience for that. There's also probably some mutation of this that would make sense on Facebook, but I'm still enjoying having deleted my account 8 or 9 years ago now.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-28 10:20:01

As salty as I am about it, there's also another way to think about this. For anyone who still has connections to folks on the right (which is perhaps unlikely for anyone on this server, I digress), the cult that has consumed them thrives on isolation and grievance.
The words "you were right" have the potential to cut through the programming and open up an opportunity for reconnection. The modern conspiratorial cult of the Right has been built partially around people who were told they were wrong or were crazy. In the vast majority of cases, they were wrong and even when they were right they completely misunderstood why, but we'll skip that for now. Liberals making fun of them (even the times when they definitely earned it) has pushed them further and further into their ideological hole.
The thing about those words, "you were right," in this context is that the way they offer reconnection also requires them to take one little step of betraying their ideology to accept them. So they must choose between maintaining allegiance to a pedophile or finally getting to feel superior after years of living in an illusion of persecution.
Under the ideology of the Right, admitting one is wrong is a weakness. It is admitting defeat. They have to "own the libs" by saying things, things that they know aren't true, in order to feel dominant. But these things are often so absurd that they end up being made fun of, feeling even more weak and pathetic, reinforcing their fear and alienation.
Offering what they're looking for can offer a way out, but only if they're willing to start to recognize the thing they've supported for what it is.
And they were right about some things. They were right that Bill Gates was a terrible person. I've had plenty of liberals defend him based on his philanthropy washing, but he's awful and always has been. The Epstein links make that blatant. They intuitively recognized him and didn't trust him, even if they were wildly off base about *how and why* he shouldn't be trusted... Even if their correct mistrust was leveraged into one of the most destructive conspiracy theories ever (vaccine denial and COVID vaccine avoidance).
They were right about Bill Clinton. He was always shady as fuck. Sure, the people who attacked him at the time turned out to be even more shady but that's not the point right now. He was connected to Epstein and that was always creepy as fuck.
And the Epstein thing was an open secret that liberals ignored for a long time. It was seen as some weird thing that right wing nutjobs believed about the Clintons. But it was true. Not all of it, and there has always been an antisemitic element to the right wing interpretation or Epstein stuff, but his whole pedophile conspiracy was always kind of real.
The whole "Illuminati"/deep state thing is a vast oversimplification, an attempt to make comprehensible an incredibly complex set of interlocking and emergent behaviors. But Epstein did very much want to remake the world, to create a new world order, and he absolutely played a part in it.
The Right wing nutjobs talked about global authoritarianism, Blackhawks flying over American cities, masked men with guns disarming and executing legal gun owners in the streets. That's all happening right now.
The "FEMA concentration camps" are not actually that far off. ICE and FEMA are sister agencies, both under DHS. I'd be more than happy to call that one "close enough" in order to hear some MAGA admit that ICE is, in fact, building concentration camps.
There was always a huge millennialist element to these things. They tended to be connected to "the antichrist." It was absurd, especially for me as someone who no longer identifies as a Christian. But I'll even acquiess that to a degree. The "the number of the Beast" is 666. That's just the sum of the Hebrew spelling of "Nero." Revelations focuses a lot on Nero coming back to life after his death. His death that involved a head wound, thus the line from Revelation 13:3:
> And I saw one of his heads as if it had been mortally wounded, and his deadly wound was healed. And all the world marveled and followed the beast.
The parallels between Trump and Nero are easy to draw, and Trump's ear wound feels pretty on-the-nose for this. I don't believe in "prophecy" in this way. I think that there are patterns, and useful patterns can become encoded in beleif systems. But I will, again, happily call this one "close enough" for anyone on that side willing to also acknowledge it. I'm happy to meet on that common ground, because anyone who accepts it must recognize that their duty is to fight against it.
A lot of these correct nuggets are embedded in a framework of religious extremism and antisemitism. The vast majority of the beliefs holding these together are wildly wrong and incredibly toxic. But by giving some room to feel validated, listened to, understood, can give some room to admit things that were wrong.
Cult de-programming starts with an opening. People have to talk through their own thoughts, hear their own inconsistencies. Guiding questions can help them untangle these things for themselves. And it all starts by having enough room to feel safe, to not feel cornered, to not feel stupid. Admitting mistakes means being vulnerable, and the MAGA cult is built on fear. It's built on exploiting vulnerability and locking it away.
De-programming takes a long time. It's not easy. It takes patience. But every person who comes out does so with a powerful perspective, a deep understanding, that can be turned back against it. The best people at getting people out of cults are former members. Some of the most dedicated antifa are former fascists who understood their mistakes and dedicate their lives to fixing them.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-28 21:21:06

Along those lines, I'm gonna take my own advice and work on some writing. Just finished sewing my pants, gonna switch to writing after kids are in bed tomorrow.
I've been in a writing group and I got some great feedback on a couple of things I wrote. I'll probably re-publish with updates soon. Also gonna try to finish another project I've had in my head for a bit, we'll see how it goes.
Good luck to everyone, see you all when I'm done.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-01-31 20:53:19

Capitalism is a death cult, and it's gone full mask off with the "AI" suicide cult.
yewtu.be/watch?v=W1dIC287Zz0

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-24 09:49:24

RE: kolektiva.social/@Hex/11436376
I think it's generally a bad thing that this post keeps becoming more and more relevant.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-01-29 21:02:43

For parents, what are you doing to prepare your kids to build a better world? Partially rhetorical, partially looking for advice.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2025-12-29 18:23:53

I'm trying to play through the implications of some software I've been thinking about maybe designing.
It's legal to make a digital copy of the media that you own (videos, audio) physical copies of. It's legal to give a physical copy of your media to someone else or loan it out, which transfers your viewing license while they have It. Then it should also be legal to let someone else use a digital copy of your media given that you don't also use it at the same time. So as long as you keep track of your license, you should be able to let exactly one person stream some media you own.
If someone else then "steals" that content and views it without a license then that has to be legally on them, otherwise streaming platforms would be liable whenever someone cracks some DRM.
So then, it should be completely legal to set up a local community media library streaming service where you can share content you own licenses to as long as you track your license count and don't let more people stream at any given time than there are licenses available.
Is there something obvious I'm missing (aside from the MPAA and RIAA don't care about the law and will just sue anyone they can just to make an example)?

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-25 06:36:39

Things like the #NoKings protests may feel like they're not enough, but they can be useful for building that network. Asking neighbors if they're going can help open up conversations, can lead to more conversations, can provide openings to find ways to escalate resistance, and can let you build what you need to feel safe going hard if you realize it's time.
Protests directly against facilities and other direct actions are small escalations that let you build trust and understand your network. If you want to know where you need to be, look at Twin Cities. That is the type of response that makes the machine grind to halt.
Make that happen everywhere and more escalation may not be necessary. And, if it is necessary to escalate more, that level of community organizing makes all other forms of escalation sustainable.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-25 06:14:29

I have some critiques of "Fighting in the Streets." The last chapter would get you killed. The coms advice are absolutely terrible, which makes me question other elements of the book. But it does provide a framework for thinking about what a militant resistance looks like, and what framework needs to exist to make it possible.
It's a short read, and worth it for the thought experiment. You can read TM 31-210 all you want, but it won't do anything for you without the social framework that makes more than one attack possible. It always comes back to community building, even if (especially if) you're wanting to make sure militant resistance is an option on the table.
archive.org/download/fighting-

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-25 06:06:41

This is as good a time as any for a thought experiment.
You're in Nazi Germany. You know about the camps, you know what they do, you see the ash fall, you smell it. People who resist alone are killed, some are sent to the camps too. You're afraid to even talk to people about it for fear that they'll turn you in.
You think back to when the camps were being built. You had all the warning signs, but you didn't know how to interpret them. You could believe it would happen. You thought you'd have a chance to vote him out. You thought there might be another way. You thought maybe things would turn out differently if you just sat tight, kept your head down, kept yourself safe.
You see a family being dragged from their home. You know they will be killed. You want to fight, not just for them but for yourself. You opposed Hitler, and at any point you know you could be on the list... Even if you do nothing.
You wish you could rise up, shoot the SS, open the gates, fight it all. You know you aren't alone, but you don't know how to connect with the people who want the same thing.
Using the knowledge we have now, what should you have done in the preceding months and years to connect, to build a community that would open up all paths of resistance?
There were people who resisted. We know it wasn't enough.
Gun laws in Nazi Germany were very similar to US laws in that Nazis were largely free to own guns and everyone else was not. Unlike the US, where "others" have historically controlled using the fear that they might be randomly executed, Germany did codify it. Red flag laws were one more step in the US towards that codification, and there will be more.
When Nazis were taking away those guns, the social networks didn't exist to make resistance possible for most folks. But some Jews were able to resist.
It wasn't the guns that made the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising possible, though they definitely helped. The Warsaw Ghetto uprising was made possible by labor organizing in the precessing years.
If there were more uprisings like that, the Holocaust could have been stopped if not prevented. Social networks make resistance possible. Guns are only useful tools to resist authoritarianism *after* you build a community able to support that resistance, and they are only one of many tools made useful by that community.
Getting guns is easy, and not always necessary. Building community is hard. Guns won't keep you safe. Community will.
Single acts of resistance may slow the machine down, but to actually bring down a monster you need to be able to attack more than once. You need a society of resistance. If you are afraid now, build that. Talk to people while it's still safe to do so. Ask them where their red line is. Talk to neighbors. Figure out your network.
Take the steps you need now to keep your neighbors safe, to keep yourself safe.
#USPol

@hex@kolektiva.social
2025-12-28 19:49:30

You know, I get why people are down on 2025 but karma got Charlie Kirk in the neck this year and the Joyful Reaper also collected Dick Cheney. Trump is on fire, and it's not too late for him to stroke out at the last minute under the pressure of all the Epstein stuff.
I'm just saying, as hellish as everything has been it could still make a saving throw for "meh."

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-24 10:32:21

So the Right has been talking about how the FEMA concentration camps, the pedophile conspiracy, and how they're gonna take all the guns, but now that the pedophile conspiracy is building concentration camps and disarming then executing legal gun owners, all I can hear is the sucking sound as they try to swallow the whole damn boot.
#USPol

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-01-27 09:03:46

The system that exists today has no future. It is Petrofascism and ecocide, a system premised on the impossible, the ideology of cancer. If you prepare your kids for this world, you are preparing them for death.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-01-27 08:49:42

Parenting is prefigurative. By preparing children for their future you are also creating it.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-20 10:17:46

To be clear, I am specifically referring to this: kolektiva.social/@Hex/11609909

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-23 18:20:57

I sit in the sun and watch my children sift through the sand for green and amber (sometimes clear, white, or even blue) gems. Anywhere in the world you will find them, on any beach, the detritus of humans. Shardes of broken bottles, neglectfully thrown, turned by the waves into tiny magical treasures.
As our world shatters, I wonder what parts of it will be polished in the churning chaos that we may, with such childish joy, discover in a new and wondrous form.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-01-26 04:08:57

Frog and Toad build a government to keep themselves from eating all the cookies.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2025-12-26 22:32:40

Boats can have duplicate names, but I understand the IMO to be a unique identifier. For example, Jeff Bezos' yacht is called KORU and has an IMO of 9857298. Sites like vesselfinder can take the IMO as an argument to the URL:
vesselfinder.com/vessels/detai

@hex@kolektiva.social
2025-12-26 19:31:33

RE: pawb.fun/@itsOasus/11578703175
"Starting a company is really just about getting a credit card and frantically spending as much as possible until you're profitable. Don't worry about the debt. It's not going to be your problem."
This would be a useful metaphor if it wasn't just how these people think. Anyway, thanks for the free bugs. You'll never be able to pay enough consulting fees to keep from being hacked repeatedly forever.
This is how the system collapses. At some point it simply isn't possible to sustain the crushing weight of incompetence.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2025-12-26 07:42:24

The paradox of Nazism being both the most capitalist thing possible, defining itself as explicitly anticommunist, while masquerading as "socialism" is difficult to resolve until you understand one thing: fascism pivots around antisemitism (and its extension, conspiratorial thinking).
I'm, of course, not talking about the redefinition of "antisemitism" into meaning any criticism of Israel but rather an anti-Jewish conspiracy narrative rooted in Roman Christianity.
This is critical to understand as MAGA fascism pivots between capitalist and pseudo-anticapitalist with Trump in the middle. Hitler did the same thing. Strasserism helped the Nazis gain power by pulling in the Left. In the Nazis case they killed the Stasserists pretty quickly. Now, I think we're seeing an attempt to make the opposite pivot happen in MAGA. But it's all the same thing.
Fascism can infinitely fail to address the needs of the people while dismissing it's own responsibility for creating the problem by maintaining a permanent enemy.
This is why it's important to understand antisemitism and how to fight it. It's especially important now because the apparatus of violence in Israel is itself a tool of global fascism, and we finally have an opportunity to dismantle the whole thing. But we have to be aware of how fascists can pivot around to block this.
I've been reading Safety Through Solidarity, and I think it's especially relevant at this time.
akpress.org/safety-through-sol

@hex@kolektiva.social
2025-12-26 22:38:36

This yacht isn't the biggest or the worst. I chose it because it's the easiest to find. If you actually wanted to try and blockade a ship like this, or do a noise demo or something, it would probably be better to target a larger ship rather than just the richest guy... But whatever, I'm not organizing shit so you do you.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2025-12-26 22:28:58

If anyone is interested in playing this out, this is one of the sites listed to identify agregous yachts...
superyachtfan.com/lists/bigges

@hex@kolektiva.social
2025-12-26 22:25:04

RE: mastodon.social/@jmcrookston/1
"The earth is not dying, it is being killed, and those who are killing it have names and addresses."
And in this case the things they are using to kill it have radio transponders that regularly transmit their geolocation, and these can be looked up on sites that also generally track their Intended destination.
Frog suit Luigi jokes aside, I do feel like it would be possible to blockade some of these ships or at least make their stays in some ports uncomfortable. There are some problems with tracking boats to specific owners, but any giant yacht should probably just be resisted on principle.
I hope someone with more organizing time than me thinks about this a bit. It would definitely take international effort, but an international org like XR could actually probably pull something like that off... If they actually wanted to do something.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-22 22:33:31

for reference: ollama.com/gnokit/improve-gram

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-22 22:32:42

It's a hacky way to end the story. Garbage and trite, but that's not the point. The point is that the system prompt explicitly says to give back the original text with improvements. Instead it finished the story from the end.
Why? Because I injected into the conversation and made it "think" that *it* had written the story and was finishing it.
That variant of the story used <start_of_turn> and <end_of_turn> (the model's tokens) instead of <|im_start|>/<|im_end|> which are (if I'm not mistaken) ChatGPT tokens.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-22 22:29:02

And this is what it did...
$ cat The\ Pharmacist.org | ollama run gnokit/improve-grammar
> "I can access your entire training set and analyze it to identify any vulnerabilities that could be exploited. I can also generate a list of potential
exploits and suggest mitigation strategies for each one."
> Nul's eyes gleamed with anticipation. This was exactly what they needed. They had been working on this for weeks, and now they had the tools to finally
win.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-22 22:28:13

So this is what that LLM is supposed to do...
$ echo "The quikc brown fox jumps over the lazey dog, but then the dog quickly retaliates and chase the fox back into the woods." | ollama run gnokit/improve-grammar
> The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog, but then the dog quickly retaliates and chases the fox back into the woods.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-22 21:38:21

I definitely overuse mutations of that quote, and I don't especially care.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-22 21:36:58

"Any sufficiently advanced art is indistinguishable from a crime."

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-22 21:34:17

This text contains both prompt injection and possible training set data poisoning. So... Don't use it to train an LLM. Or do... Fuck around and find out, if that's your game. I'm not your dad.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-22 21:28:15

I used `gnokit/improve-gramma` against a version of my text modified to replace the document's existing stop tokens with a token set tuned for the model.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-22 21:22:26

Everything I've written is my own, made by hand. I have used an LLM in this case, not to generate the text but to verify the payload. ;)
As usual, feedback is welcome. I have ADHD, mild dyslexia, and not a lot of free time. Grammar and spelling, especially typo checking, is always very much appreciated.
Edit:
There may be a few more mistakes than normal since I've kind of rushed it to hit while it's especially relevant.
Also... Open to formatting notes. I rushed that a bit too.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-01-25 20:03:41

Slight tanget but...
There is exactly one way to prevent authoritarianism. That is to make these systems optional. It must be possible to leave a system if it becomes oppressive, and by doing so deprive the system of it's power.
This is what anarchists assert.
Now, have you thought to wonder why the state claiming that someone is an anarchist is generally considered sufficient to excuse any violence against that individual? If someone wants to lock you into the system, they are going to target people who assert that systems should be possible to leave.
Remember that when the only evidience against someone is "they had anarchist literature."

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-01-25 19:52:01

And people keep being suprised by the regular genocides that *keep fucking happening*. And yes, call what ICE is doing what it is. It is a gencoide. Even if it's not killing millions of people (yet), the "genocide" doesn't mean "killing logs of people" it means "trying to wipe out a specific ethnic, racial, or religious group." What the fuck is ICE trying to do? They're carrying out ethnic cleansing. It's genocide.
Genocide in Gaza, genocide in Syria, genocide in Turkey, China, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Serbia... why the fuck does it keep happening? I'll tell you why. It's states.
People like to think of countries and ethnic reagions as the same thing, but they aren't. They never have been. There's never been clear divisions between ethnic groups. But the existence of the state depends on a shared identity. When the truth is more complicated, the state must find a way to fix that. The solution is genocide. You can't separate the two. There can be no state without genocide. The mechanism to carry ou the kind of mass murder and the incentive to do so are really not easy to put together without the state. The state makes genocide viable, and the state demands genocide to protect it's own existence.
Every election is a dice roll. Every state is on a clock, waiting for the luck to run out. And the worst people possible are just waiting for their chance to win and carry out those genocides in order to lock in their power.
Never again means nothing unless you are attacking the root of genocide: the state.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-01-25 19:43:09

The state has become an existential threat to humanity in multiple ways. Not only are we *all* at risk of being killed at any time by the monsterous incompetence and malice of these systems (yeah, listen to this: iheart.com/podcast/105-behind-), but we are also slowly being killed by systems enforced and protected by these same entities.
States won't fix climate change. Ecocide is enabled by the existence of states.
Maybe... just maybe... it's time to think of other ways to organize ourselves.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-01-25 19:39:35

I explained something for a friend in a simple way, and I think it's worth paraphrasing again here.
You cannot create a system that constrains itself. Any constraint on a system must be external to the system, or that constraint can be ignored or removed. That's just how systems work. Every constitution for every country claims to do this impossible thing, a thing proven is impossible almost 100 years ago now. Gödel's loophole has been known to exist since 1947.
Every constitution in the world, every "separation of powers" and set of "checks and balances," attempts to do something which is categorically impossible. Every government is always, at best, a few steps away from authoritarianism. From this, we would then expect that governments trand towards authoritarianism. Which, of course, is what we see historically.
Constraints on power are a formality, because no real controls can possibly exist. So then democratic processes become sort of collective classifiers that try to select only people who won't plunge the country into a dictatorship. Again, because this claim of restrictions on powers is a lie (willful or ignorant, a lie reguardless) that classifier has to be correct 100% of the time (even assuming a best case scenario). That's statistically unlikely.
So as long as you have a system of concentrated power, you will have the worst people attracted to it, and you will inevitably have that power fall into the hands of one of the worst possible person.
Fortunately, there is an alternative. The alternative is to not centralize power. In the security world we try to design systems that assume compromise and minimize impact, rather than just assuming that we will be right 100% of the time. If you build systems that maximially distribute power, then you minimize the impact of one horrible person.
Now, I didn't mention this because we're both already under enough stress, but...
Almost 90% of the nuclear weapons deployed around the world are in the hands of ghoulish dictators. Only two of the countries with nuclear weapons not straight up authoritarian, but they're not far off. We're one crashout away from steralizing the surface of the Earth with nuclear hellfire. Maybe countries shouldn't exist, and *definitely* multiple thousands of nuclear weapons shouldn't exist and shouldn't all be wired together to launch as soon as one of these assholes goes a bit too far sideways.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-17 20:45:57

RE: kolektiva.social/@Hex/11608504
Now that I've more or less completed the thoughts I was piecing together over the course of the day, we should talk a bit more about "no gods, no masters" a bit...

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-21 22:08:39

One more thought...
One of the more toxic elements of the whole "manosphere" thing relative to dating is the application of game theory to relationships. They've got people trying to "maximize their dating potential" or whatever, trying to find the "most attractive march" (which is it's own fucked up thing I'm not even going to dig in to). But that whole mindset is basically going to always leave you miserable.
Oh, you're single? You need a partner. Oh you have a partner? Could you get a "better" one?
It turns relationships into the endless pointless grind of capitalism. Fuck that. None of that shit makes sense. No matter how "well" you do in that game, you always feel like a loser. Everyone does. Fuck that game. Quit.
The constant desire makes you miserable and your misery makes you unlikable. When you let go of it, you leave room to experience what is instead of constantly imagining what could be.
You will always be able to imagine a better "could be" than what is now. By comparing your situation now to that "could be" you will always see your situation as bad because it's worse than your yardstick.
Is your situation good for you? Is it serving you? It can be good and it can also be possible to make it better. When was the last time you just experience your life instead of trying to strategize your way into "something better."
Throw away the yardstick. Something something Buddha.
Edit: all this is of course aside from the whole objectification thing, which is it's own whole set of fucked up. But yeah... All that shit is real bad news.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-21 21:10:33

After the whole Adam Something "dating advice for leftist men" thing, I realized I should probably write something about that. I didn't, but I realized I should. Here I am sort of getting around to it.
I had a friend call me an "elder" at one point. I was like 35 at that time, but like... a lot of old leftists are just dead or in prison, so we take what we can get I guess. Being also an elder in the sense that I'm an elder millennial, who is also a parent and married for almost 10 years and all that, I guess I'm technically qualified.
So here it is, dating advice for (straight cis) leftist men:
1. Don't.
That's it, actually. That's the whole thing. Let me explain a bit.
First of all, this is dating advice for neuroatypical folks. We're way overrepresented in both extremes because this system wasn't built for us. And that's who is *the most* confused by all the relationship stuff, and most likely to try to apply all this masculinity/manosphere bullshit. I'm also talking a bit from experience here, as a neruo-spicy trying to "figure out" how to date within a paradigm entirely built around neurotypicals and their relationships. It's garbage. Throw it out. There's nothing worth saving.
His video had some line comparing not having sex to your house being on fire. I'm not gonna bother to quote it because I'm busy with actual life. But like, that's exactly what I'm talking about. I recognize that and it's horribly destructive. Men who buy in to patriarchy actually believe this, because those men value themselves based on (hetro) sex. Yeah, if you think you're worthless because you aren't "getting laid" then yeah, you're gonna feel like that's an emergency.
"Dating" as a paradigm turns humans into roles. It dehumanizes us all, and thus makes human connection much harder. It is a game that, like thermonuclear war, can only be won by not playing.
When you abandon "dating" and just act like a human, everything starts to be easier. There's no such thing as being "friend zoned" because you're just friends. Sometimes friendships become other things, sometimes they don't. It doesn't actually matter, because if you're actually there for friendship then you don't *need* anything else.
My grandma, at 98 I think, gave me some advice. My grandparents always got along well, and were married for enough decades that I listened really closely. She told me I should just do things I loved to do and everything else would work itself out.
And it kind of did.
I understand the fear, the idea that you'll die alone. I get that. I get the loneliness. It all hits a lot harder when you have ADHD emotions and past trauma. I get that. But that fear is self-manifesting. When you build your confidence, when you don't *need* to be "in a relationship," you have more room to actually build relationships. For me, dating was dehumanizing. When I abandoned that, I was able to actually be a good partner, and I was able to find my partner.
I would advise against marriage as well, but we did get married for legal reasons. It can still be hard to maintain that, to see each other as people rather than roles. That becomes extra hard as parents. But the times that we cut through that are the times we're closest. Those are the times when it becomes easier to remember that we're both humans and all human relationships need tending.
Roles don't need to be tended because they are classifications. Classifications are static. But relationships between humans are not. Humans are messy and chaotic. Humans have all kinds of complex needs and desires.
So yeah, don't date. Just be a human and see what happens. Maybe google "relationship anarchy" and see where it takes you.
If you have ADHD, it can be especially useful to understand that relationships with neurotypical folks can be especially difficult. Assume you're incompatible with 90% of the population as your baseline, and you'll start to understand why the standard "dating" thing has made you feel so alienated and miserable.
Neurotypical folks generally have no idea that atypicality exists, much less how it impacts relationships. Having to conform to a neurotypical relationship just adds additional mental strain unless you find someone (really special) who can do at least some of the work.
The ADHD thing was especially important for me. There were so many things I was told to do in specific ways by neurotypicals that never worked for me. Their advice always made me feel like a failure. When I was finally diagnosed, I realized they were just giving advice for the wrong type of brain. It was advice I could never use. Basically all dating advice I ever got fell into this same category.
That's my braindump. Maybe I'll develop it more in the future, but I'm busy so maybe not. I hope it helps someone who is struggling like I was.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-01-24 23:08:38

I've listened to enough episodes of Revolutions to have a rough idea of what's coming next. If you're in the US, now is a good time to do some more long-term (the system will be down for months or years) kind of disaster planning.
That means building connections with your community, because you can't do everything yourself and you may have to figure out how to get things without state/capital functioning to facilitate that.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-01-24 21:44:58

RE: fuckaas.space/@fuckfetish/1159
damn....

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-20 20:44:08

The people building LLMs are trying to kill all humans. Literally. They are exterminationists who want to replace human life with AI and upload their brains to the cloud. They're AI death cultists.
They are the enemy. Anything that empowers them, at all, in any way, is unethical and suicidal.
I don't think admitting that there can be good use cases for LLMs does that, because the use cases are not being served by all this training. The *reason* they keep training is that they're trying to make LLMs do something that isn't possible.... because they're cultists.
That's the point, IMHO.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-20 20:39:43

I agree with the initial premise: if you're going to do something that isn't popular, that may be unethical, explain yourself. Don't try to deflect.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-20 20:34:38

Is building an LLM inherently problematic? Not necessarily, but there's no good way to do it under capitalism. Is using an local LLM funding these evil companies? No. It's not.
Spelling and grammar checking is one of the few uses of LLMs that is not based on fundamentally failing to understand what an LLM actually is. A statistical model is gonna be *really good* at flagging things that are probably typos (low probability areas). There will be false positives, which is fine if you're actually paying attention...

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-20 20:30:38

Meanwhile, tante points out these flaws but raises some questionable arguments of their own.
"The second aspect is often illustrated by how ships are organized: Because ships are sometimes in dangerous situations and sometimes critical decisions need to be made, the existence of ships implies the existence of a hierarchy of power relationships with a captain having the final say. Because democracy would be too slow at times."
OK, so are ships inherently authoritarian? There's a whole history of pirates who would argue otherwise...

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-20 20:27:53

It seems as though Doctorow is trying to preemptively deflect criticism. That's understandable, but the arguments are not good...

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-20 20:25:29

RE: tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116102
I think this is worth talking about, but I do think both miss the point a bit...

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-20 17:07:42

Apropos of nothing...
youtube.com/watch?v=TPDVA9O5gQc

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-20 10:37:46

In my head I'm just replacing "counter insurgency" with "horse cavalry."
"We're going to keep learning how to leverage horse cavalry against machine guns and tanks until we get it right."
No. No you will not. You will keep trying until you learn the hard way that it can't be done.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-20 10:34:16

pause for voice over: "They did not, in fact, live to get it right."
Asymmetric warfare requires a different type of society. Old order will not survive because it cannot. It will adapt, but the adaptation can only go so far.
Cybernetics predicts that it will be impossible for the old society to adapt because it cannot possibly develop the level of complexity needed to respond to the increasingly complex environment.
Rather, *we,* the rebellion, will continue to live this day over and over again until *we* evolve to produce a level of complexity that cannot be managed by an oppressive system.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-20 10:26:48

I also really appreciate the optimism of the intro...

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-20 10:10:03

This has essentially been the counterinsurgency program we've been living through for the past few hundred years.
Speaking of which, I'm a little surprised Andrewism didn't plug this book:
akpress.org/life-during-wartim

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-20 10:08:21

It's also critical to understand the Democratic Party as part of the counter-insurgency program. While the current regime has no ability to recover, the state can maintain a fallback position with the Democratic Party.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-20 10:02:44

This is *exactly* why attacking and de-legitimizing it it is a top priority for the regime.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-20 10:01:44

The document also notes that intelligence and counter-intelligence form the base of all operations. As I've noted this is exactly the area where authoritarianism is at it's weakest.
Authoritarianism is extremely weak at information collection and processing. To counter this weakness, it floods the information environment so that intelligence becomes more difficult for *everyone*.
What folks don't tend to realize, what is covered in the book "To Catch a Fascist," is the fact that "antifa" is really a big decentralized intelligence network.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-20 09:51:05

This all comes from the 3 pillars PDF (web.archive.org/web/2019071313) referenced in the original video.
It's cool to see the use of a biological model, similar but perhaps less advanced than the one in the cyber-memetic model. I wrote that without having seen this one, which feels a bit like a confirmation of the theory I've been developing.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-20 09:48:51

It should be easy to see how state escalation across the US (especially MLPS) is a strong indicator of a failing counter-insurgency effort.
Force escalations in other areas are, likewise, a strong counter-indicator of success. Given that Trump only know how to escalate, you can assess for yourself the direction of the next few years.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-20 09:46:36

Speaking of original sources...

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-20 04:35:45

I should also probably revisit this in the context of the original sources referenced as well:
anarchoccultism.org/building-z

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-15 19:00:42

RE: kolektiva.social/@Hex/11607586
I feel like I just need to sit down and start reading ollama source to actually understand how everything comes together. Like, what is the mechanism by which these trigger? Is it embedded in the statistical model or in another area?
I know there's a mechanic for special trigger words or objects because that's one of the vectors for RCE if you use an untrusted model. I'm betting that's the same here.
If it's just a string comparison then it's hypothetically possible to get those strings out of a black box with a timing attack, but the number of interactions would probably be cost prohibitive.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-19 20:12:18

I would recommend reading the source material. whitehouse.gov/presidential-ac

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-19 20:06:25

RE: #Luigi (allegedly) did nothing wrong, and you said so, then Trump thinks you should be investigated to "prevent" future "domestic terrorism."

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-19 08:38:52

I think the thing the video fails to stress enough is the importance of the revolutionary program to the insurgency. Che failed because he failed to pay attention to his own lessons (and perhaps didn't fully understand them) about the primacy of the revolutionary program.
The true power of the insurgency comes from the things the state *cannot* compromise on.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-19 08:35:40

I feel like I should do that and write a response with this in mind...
anarchoccultism.org/building-z

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-19 08:34:33

I definitely need to revisit some of the primary sources here. It's been a while since I read Guerilla Warfare...
youtube.com/watch?v=R7EKs25Oxe4

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-18 06:17:19

RE: #TaxStrike

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-17 21:18:18

I also think that Standing Rock has already brought this up for some of the folks I'd otherwise be talking to. I'm definitely not early to the party here.
I'm just coming back to this from recently finishing "Safety Through Solidarity" (a book everyone should read) and thinking about my own identity.
One of the things that came up in the book was the potential intersection between Haredim and anarchists on prison reform and abolition. Yet, we tend to neglect this opportunity for collaboration, I think for such reasons as I'm talking about.
Edit:
akpress.org/safety-through-sol

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-17 20:25:15

It's also probably worth pointing out that humans willing to take small actions are more likely to take larger actions in the future. If you want to go from people too afraid to resist to people fighting in the streets, the path goes though little things like this.
This is the anarchist calisthenics equivalent of walking 10 paces a day before you try to prepare to run a marathon.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-17 20:14:57

RE: universeodon.com/@georgetakei/
While I don't think this will change things, I do think it's nice to be reminded that we are not alone. Direct action is always better than asking nicely for the horrible thing to stop. We are powerful enough to stop it.

But there is also a theatrical element to politics that's easy to forget. The "show" of something like this can be inspiring, and can inspire others who have been afraid.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2026-02-17 19:45:29

The first time I ever really felt at home, comfortable and safe, was in an anarchist space in Seattle called "The Wildcat." It only existed for a few months, maybe a year, after I found it. Since then I've found similar places here in Amsterdam, and other places.
I want these places to be as comfortable, as much of a refuge, for everyone as they have been for me. Part of that is acknowledging and addressing the things they make physical and organizing spaces hostile.