Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

@arXiv_csDC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-22 07:39:51

Efficient Pre-Training of LLMs via Topology-Aware Communication Alignment on More Than 9600 GPUs
Guoliang He, Youhe Jiang, Wencong Xiao, Kaihua Jiang, Shuguang Wang, Jun Wang, Zixian Du, Zhuo Jiang, Xinlei Zhang, Binhang Yuan, Eiko Yoneki
arxiv.org/abs/2509.15940

@arXiv_csCV_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-22 10:16:51

When and What: Diffusion-Grounded VideoLLM with Entity Aware Segmentation for Long Video Understanding
Pengcheng Fang, Yuxia Chen, Rui Guo
arxiv.org/abs/2508.15641

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-21 08:44:40

Topology-Aware Volume Fusion for Spectral Computed Tomography via Histograms and Extremum Graph
Mohit Sharma, Emma Nilsson, Martin Falk, Talha Bin Masood, Lee Jollans, Anders Persson, Tino Ebbers, Ingrid Hotz
arxiv.org/abs/2508.14719

@Techmeme@techhub.social
2025-10-15 14:12:34

A survey of 28K adults in 25 countries on AI: 81% have heard a lot or a little, 34% are more concerned than excited, and 42% are equally concerned and excited (Pew Research Center)
pewresearch.org/global/2025/10

@arXiv_csRO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-19 11:11:20

SIGN: Safety-Aware Image-Goal Navigation for Autonomous Drones via Reinforcement Learning
Zichen Yan, Rui Huang, Lei He, Shao Guo, Lin Zhao
arxiv.org/abs/2508.12394

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-10-20 11:16:23

Day 26: Emily Short
If you know who Short is, you know exactly why she's on this list. If you don't, you're probably in the majority. She's an absolutely legendary author within the interactive fiction (IF) community, which gets somewhat pigeonholed by stuff like Zork when there's actually a huge range of stuff in the medium some of which isn't even puzzle-focused, and Short has been writing & coding on the bleeding edge of things for decades.
I was lucky enough to be introduced to Short's work in graduate school, where we played "Galatea" as part of an interactive fiction class. Short uses a lot of clever parser tricks to make your conversation with a statue feel very fluid and conversational, giving to contemporary audiences a great example of how vibrant interaction with a well-designed agent can be in contrast to an LLM, if you're willing to put in some work on bespoke parsing & responses (although the user does need to know basic IF conventions). While I didn't explore the full range of Galatea's many possible outcomes, it left a strong impression on me as a vision for what IF could be besides dorky puzzles, and I think that "visionary" is a great term to describe Short.
If you'd like you get a feel for her (very early) work, you can play Galatea here: #30AuthorsNoMen

@gwire@mastodon.social
2025-10-20 18:42:19

I don't disagree with suggestions that the UK public sector should have less reliance on the big-three (American) cloud providers. But this has been a concern for more than a decade, and people should at least be aware of both the "GOV.UK PaaS" and UKCloud.

@arXiv_csSD_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-17 08:51:20

Omni-CLST: Error-aware Curriculum Learning with guided Selective chain-of-Thought for audio questuin answering
Jinghua Zhao, Hang Su, Lichun Fan, Zhenbo Luo, Jian Luan, Hui Wang, Haoqin Sun, Yong Qin
arxiv.org/abs/2509.12275

@cdonat@hostsharing.coop
2025-10-19 11:29:21

Is there already an ActivityPub vocabulary for job openings, or cvs?
I'm trying to make my CV-webpage more visible, and also create a job-bot, that everyone can set up with their sources, and queries.
Obviously the idea is, to help people find jobs, and fill vacancies, without having to resort to a centralized network, like e.g. LinkedIn.
I'm aware of these efforts, though they're not ActivityPub related:

@arXiv_csSE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-19 09:15:59

How Much Can a Behavior-Preserving Changeset Be Decomposed into Refactoring Operations?
Kota Someya, Lei Chen, Michael J. Decker, Shinpei Hayashi
arxiv.org/abs/2508.11993

@mikeymikey@hachyderm.io
2025-10-15 16:15:16

Heard a particular application of the definition of Planck's constant I wasn't aware of that made more real for me "we just can't see that small" and drove home that it was not about "quantiziation of spacetime".
I knew Planck energy was where a photon could become a black hole - but "our particle smashing makes black holes past a certain point" didn't say much to me about spacetime itself.
But today I was reading and saw where someone pointed out that beyond a certain scale, we use photons and light for studying reality - and that a photon with Planck wavelength by definition would have Planck energy.
So to make light of the right wavelength to study features of reality smaller than Planck length, you'd -also- trigger the black hole behavior.
For some reason this explanation sits _way_ better in my head. I get they're all related, I'd just never heard this angle of it in this particular way before.

@simon_lucy@mastodon.social
2025-08-15 09:47:09

As Putin is more aware than most, flattery and threats are his chief tactics against Trump, that and his trapping Trump in private into saying yes, to whatever he wants.
But they're also the tactics for Ukraine's and its Allies against the TACO President.
Trump wants out from under, an empty promise to share Ukraine's minerals won't cut it with Putin as he'll say they're his anyway.
A preemptive missile strike from Provideniyan Separatists on the t…

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-08 10:15:20

Less is More Tokens: Efficient Math Reasoning via Difficulty-Aware Chain-of-Thought Distillation
Abdul Waheed, Chancharik Mitra, Laurie Z. Wang, Deva Ramanan, Bhiksha Raj
arxiv.org/abs/2509.05226

@gfriend@mas.to
2025-09-14 20:20:58

The most effective way to destroy an organization is to make it more bureaucratic. In 1944, the Office of Strategic Services, the precursor to the CIA, was aware of this. What they didn't know was that their blueprint for sabotaging Nazi operations would become the operating manual for modern corporations.
alephic.com/sabotage

@metacurity@infosec.exchange
2025-08-05 13:37:18

As we head into a blizzard of infosec news, stay ahead of the curve by checking out today's Metacurity for the latest developments, including
--Ukraine claims major hack of Russian nuclear submarine,
--SonicWall is aware of flaw exploitation,
--Perplexity is stealthily evading robots.txt,
--FinCen warns of crypt ATM crimes,
--Vietnamese hackers are targeting thousands,
--Informants' data stolen in a Louisiana sheriff's office ransomware attack, …

@davej@dice.camp
2025-09-05 06:49:23

More of this, please. (Spotted on Reddit.)
#HoesUnion

r/AmitheAsshole
u/solidarityslutts • 1h

AITA for organizing a "hoe union" of girls in my college?

Ok I know this sounds silly as hell but it's seriously got some people angry with me.

I'm in a college organization that is also big on partying.

It can be fun but sadly it can also be risky, most of my friends and I have had bad experiences.

And kinda as a joke I said to my friends that we should unionize. But they were 100% in on the idea. And we started a "hoe union"

We drew up a list sayi…
And we also told other girls at the party about why we were leaving and where, and often had lots more girls leave with us. The group chat grew from us 7 to 36, pretty much every girl in our social sphere was in it or knew of it

With all of us sharing info, we all ended up going to parties that were much more chill.

It wasn't strict or anything, like if someone in the group said we were leaving, it didn't mean anyone was forced to go. But most everyone would anyway because when practically ev…
She said it wasn't a friend group, she was aware we'd called it a "hoe union" and had "rules"

I said that it literally is made up of friends. And there aren't any enforced "rules" it's all voluntary.

I then got frustrated and asked why she thought it was appropriate to involve herself in private conversation that happened outside of school and campus, and left.

AITA for making that group chat?

[3/3]
@arXiv_csLG_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-10 11:12:49

xRouter: Training Cost-Aware LLMs Orchestration System via Reinforcement Learning
Cheng Qian, Zuxin Liu, Shirley Kokane, Akshara Prabhakar, Jielin Qiu, Haolin Chen, Zhiwei Liu, Heng Ji, Weiran Yao, Shelby Heinecke, Silvio Savarese, Caiming Xiong, Huan Wang
arxiv.org/abs/2510.08439

@arXiv_csAR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-11 07:46:23

Lifetime-Aware Design of Item-Level Intelligence
Shvetank Prakash, Andrew Cheng, Olof Kindgren, Ashiq Ahamed, Graham Knight, Jed Kufel, Francisco Rodriguez, Arya Tschand, David Kong, Mariam Elgamal, Jerry Huang, Emma Chen, Gage Hills, Richard Price, Emre Ozer, Vijay Janapa Reddi
arxiv.org/abs/2509.08193

Few countries are more aware of the fragility of democracy than Poland.
45 years ago, Lech Walesa started Poland's Solidarity Movement, stared down the Soviet Union, and became his country's first democratically elected president.
He joins the show from Phoenix, Arizona to discuss today's dangers and his own extraordinary personal and political story.
Christiane Amanpour is fixated on history, which is important, but 82 year old Lech Walesa is not having it…

@mgorny@social.treehouse.systems
2025-08-11 11:36:26

"""
All of which was of the utmost importance for subsequent developments in the medicine of the mind. In its positivist incarnation, this was little more than the combination of the two experiences that classicism had juxtaposed without ever joining them together: a social, normative and dichotomous experience of madness that revolved entirely around the imperative of confinement, formulated in a style as simple as ‘yes or no’, ‘dangerous or harmless’, and ‘good or not good for confinement’, and a finely differentiated, qualitative, juridical experience, well aware of limits and degrees, which looked into all the aspects of the behaviour of the subject for the polymorphous incarnations that insanity might assume. The psychopathology of the nineteenth century (and perhaps our own too, even now) believes that it orients itself and takes its bearings in relation to a homo natura, or a normal man pre-existing all experience of mental illness. Such a man is in fact an invention, and if he is to be situated, it is not in a natural space, but in a system that identifies the socius to the subject of the law. Consequently a madman is not recognised as such because an illness has pushed him to the margins of normality, but because our culture situates him at the meeting point between the social decree of confinement and the juridical knowledge that evaluates the responsibility of individuals before the law. The ‘positive’ science of mental illness and the humanitarian sentiments that brought the mad back into the realm of the human were only possible once that synthesis had been solidly established. They could be said to form the concrete a priori of any psychopathology with scientific pretensions.
"""
(Michel Foucault, History of Madness)

@arXiv_csIR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-11 09:41:59

G-UBS: Towards Robust Understanding of Implicit Feedback via Group-Aware User Behavior Simulation
Boyu Chen, Siran Chen, Zhengrong Yue, Kainan Yan, Chenyun Yu, Beibei Kong, Cheng Lei, Chengxiang Zhuo, Zang Li, Yali Wang
arxiv.org/abs/2508.05709

@arXiv_csGT_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-08 08:15:22

Toward Energy and Location-Aware Resource Allocation in Next Generation Networks
Mandar Datar (CEA-LETI), Mattia Merluzzi (CEA-LETI)
arxiv.org/abs/2508.05109

@arXiv_csDC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-16 08:19:16

GFS: A Preemption-aware Scheduling Framework for GPU Clusters with Predictive Spot Instance Management
Jiaang Duan, Shenglin Xu, Shiyou Qian, Dingyu Yang, Kangjin Wang, Chenzhi Liao, Yinghao Yu, Qin Hua, Hanwen Hu, Qi Wang, Wenchao Wu, Dongqing Bao, Tianyu Lu, Jian Cao, Guangtao Xue, Guodong Yang, Liping Zhang, Gang Chen
arxiv.org/…

@arXiv_csPL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-06 07:50:30

SAGE-HLS: Syntax-Aware AST-Guided LLM for High-Level Synthesis Code Generation
M Zafir Sadik Khan, Nowfel Mashnoor, Mohammad Akyash, Kimia Azar, Hadi Kamali
arxiv.org/abs/2508.03558

@arXiv_quantph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-07 11:52:12

Embedding-Aware Noise Modeling of Quantum Annealing
Seon-Geun Jeong, Mai Dinh Cong, Dae-Il Noh, Quoc-Viet Pham, Won-Joo Hwang
arxiv.org/abs/2510.04594

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-10-14 20:21:12

Day 21: Aya Yoshinaga
I'm actually generally much less aware of the creators involved in the anime I watch, for a number of reasons, and the few anime directors I could name without looking them up were all men before I started this list. I've now got a short list of anime directors/writers who are women, and the first I'll include here is Yoshinaga, in part because she was pivotal to one of my favorite lesser-known anime, "Kurau Phantom Memory". It was actually one of the first anime I watched ever, but I didn't like it just because of that, since I've rewatched it at least twice and still regard it highly. It's got a pretty cool science fiction setting, an extremely cool barely-comprehensible alien race, a female protagonist who is not sexualized and not subjected to romance, and it centers a platonic relationship torn apart by technological hubris. Very "cool seinen stuff that wouldn't make it past the focus groups today" stuff.
Besides Kurau, Yoshinaga has worked on other great stuff like Golden Kamuy, Azumanga Daioh, Durarara, and Fullmetal Alchemist, and when you see a correlation like that between well-written shows and the same writer showing up again and again, it's clear there's talent there, even if most of these are manga-based.
Probably going to circle back to at least one more anime writer, but for tomorrow I'll move on to manga probably, since I want to space out all my YA enthusiasm a bit.
#30AuthorsNoMen

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-12 09:37:59

Improving Synthetic Data Training for Contextual Biasing Models with a Keyword-Aware Cost Function
Chin Yuen Kwok, Jia Qi Yip, Eng Siong Chng
arxiv.org/abs/2509.09197

@arXiv_eessSP_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-07 09:52:24

Less Signals, More Understanding: Channel-Capacity Codebook Design for Digital Task-Oriented Semantic Communication
Anbang Zhang, Shuaishuai Guo, Chenyuan Feng, Hongyang Du, Haojin Li, Chen Sun, Haijun Zhang
arxiv.org/abs/2508.04291

@axbom@axbom.me
2025-07-29 10:33:25

Something to always be aware of: Many wheelchair users can stand and move around for brief periods of time. Not all wheelchair users are paralysed. Reasons for wheelchair use are numerous and varied.

Some wheelchair users choose not to stand in public because chances are they will be chastised and harassed if they do. With more awareness and understanding this risk can hopefully diminish over time.

For example, if a wheelchair user is able to retrieve their own wheelchair from…

@arXiv_physicsfludyn_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-03 11:23:03

Data assimilation for energy-aware hybrid models
Igor Shevchenko, Dan Crisan
arxiv.org/abs/2509.01726 arxiv.org/pdf/2509.01726

@arXiv_csCR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-25 09:29:42

Layer-Aware Representation Filtering: Purifying Finetuning Data to Preserve LLM Safety Alignment
Hao Li, Lijun Li, Zhenghao Lu, Xianyi Wei, Rui Li, Jing Shao, Lei Sha
arxiv.org/abs/2507.18631

@arXiv_eessSY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-06 08:49:59

Situationally Aware Rolling Horizon Multi-Tier Load Restoration Considering Behind-The-Meter DER
Wenlong Shi, Junyuan Zheng, Zhaoyu Wang
arxiv.org/abs/2510.02502

@arXiv_csSD_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-14 10:14:58

Peransformer: Improving Low-informed Expressive Performance Rendering with Score-aware Discriminator
Xian He, Wei Zeng, Ye Wang
arxiv.org/abs/2510.10175

@arXiv_csSE_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-11 08:47:40

A Survey on Task Scheduling in Carbon-Aware Container Orchestration
Jialin Yang, Zainab Saad, Jiajun Wu, Xiaoguang Niu, Henry Leung, Steve Drew
arxiv.org/abs/2508.05949

@arXiv_csLO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-06 08:34:00

Intensional FOL over Belnap's Billatice for Strong-AI Robotics
Zoran Majkic
arxiv.org/abs/2508.02774 arxiv.org/pdf/2508.02774

@arXiv_csMA_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-07 08:13:21

Cooperative Flexibility Exchange: Fair and Comfort-Aware Decentralized Resource Allocation
Rabiya Khalid, Evangelos Pournaras
arxiv.org/abs/2510.04192

@arXiv_csLG_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-01 09:39:22

Distribution-Aware Feature Selection for SAEs
Narmeen Oozeer, Nirmalendu Prakash, Michael Lan, Alice Rigg, Amirali Abdullah
arxiv.org/abs/2508.21324

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-08 09:50:12

Discrepancy-Aware Contrastive Adaptation in Medical Time Series Analysis
Yifan Wang, Hongfeng Ai, Ruiqi Li, Maowei Jiang, Ruiyuan Kang, Jiahua Dong, Cheng Jiang, Chenzhong Li
arxiv.org/abs/2508.05572

@arXiv_quantph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-12 11:57:03

Characterization of syndrome-dependent logical noise in detector regions
Matthew Girling, Ben Criger, Cristina Cirstoiu
arxiv.org/abs/2508.08188

‪@Nael@pachyder.me‬
2025-08-26 22:29:59

@… it was like a real guideline something like : « if you don’t want it generating stuff that don’t belong , but a more advance content aware fill, leave the prompt blank »

@arXiv_csIR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-01 07:42:21

Are Recommenders Self-Aware? Label-Free Recommendation Performance Estimation via Model Uncertainty
Jiayu Li, Ziyi Ye, Guohao Jian, Zhiqiang Guo, Weizhi Ma, Qingyao Ai, Min Zhang
arxiv.org/abs/2507.23208

@arXiv_csGT_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-07 07:40:46

Downside Risk-Aware Equilibria for Strategic Decision-Making
Oliver Slumbers, Benjamin Patrick Evans, Sumitra Ganesh, Leo Ardon
arxiv.org/abs/2510.03446

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-07-28 13:04:34

How popular media gets love wrong
Okay, so what exactly are the details of the "engineered" model of love from my previous post? I'll try to summarize my thoughts and the experiences they're built on.
1. "Love" can be be thought of like a mechanism that's built by two (or more) people. In this case, no single person can build the thing alone, to work it needs contributions from multiple people (I suppose self-love might be an exception to that). In any case, the builders can intentionally choose how they build (and maintain) the mechanism, they can build it differently to suit their particular needs/wants, and they will need to maintain and repair it over time to keep it running. It may need winding, or fuel, or charging plus oil changes and bolt-tightening, etc.
2. Any two (or more) people can choose to start building love between them at any time. No need to "find your soulmate" or "wait for the right person." Now the caveat is that the mechanism is difficult to build and requires lots of cooperation, so there might indeed be "wrong people" to try to build love with. People in general might experience more failures than successes. The key component is slowly-escalating shared commitment to the project, which is negotiated between the partners so that neither one feels like they've been left to do all the work themselves. Since it's a big scary project though, it's very easy to decide it's too hard and give up, and so the builders need to encourage each other and pace themselves. The project can only succeed if there's mutual commitment, and that will certainly require compromise (sometimes even sacrifice, though not always). If the mechanism works well, the benefits (companionship; encouragement; praise; loving sex; hugs; etc.) will be well worth the compromises you make to build it, but this isn't always the case.
3. The mechanism is prone to falling apart if not maintained. In my view, the "fire" and "appeal" models of love don't adequately convey the need for this maintenance and lead to a lot of under-maintained relationships many of which fall apart. You'll need to do things together that make you happy, do things that make your partner happy (in some cases even if they annoy you, but never in a transactional or box-checking way), spend time with shared attention, spend time alone and/or apart, reassure each other through words (or deeds) of mutual beliefs (especially your continued commitment to the relationship), do things that comfort and/or excite each other physically (anywhere from hugs to hand-holding to sex) and probably other things I'm not thinking of. Not *every* relationship needs *all* of these maintenance techniques, but I think most will need most. Note especially that patriarchy teaches men that they don't need to bother with any of this, which harms primarily their romantic partners but secondarily them as their relationships fail due to their own (cultivated-by-patriarchy) incompetence. If a relationship evolves to a point where one person is doing all the maintenance (& improvement) work, it's been bent into a shape that no longer really qualifies as "love" in my book, and that's super unhealthy.
4. The key things to negotiate when trying to build a new love are first, how to work together in the first place, and how to be comfortable around each others' habits (or how to change those habits). Second, what level of commitment you have right now, and what how/when you want to increase that commitment. Additionally, I think it's worth checking in about what you're each putting into and getting out of the relationship, to ensure that it continues to be positive for all participants. To build a successful relationship, you need to be able to incrementally increase the level of commitment to one that you're both comfortable staying at long-term, while ensuring that for both partners, the relationship is both a net benefit and has manageable costs (those two things are not the same). Obviously it's not easy to actually have conversations about these things (congratulations if you can just talk about this stuff) because there's a huge fear of hearing an answer that you don't want to hear. I think the range of discouraging answers which actually spell doom for a relationship is smaller than people think and there's usually a reasonable "shoulder" you can fall into where things aren't on a good trajectory but could be brought back into one, but even so these conversations are scary. Still, I think only having honest conversations about these things when you're angry at each other is not a good plan. You can also try to communicate some of these things via non-conversational means, if that feels safer, and at least being aware that these are the objectives you're pursuing is probably helpful.
I'll post two more replies here about my own experiences that led me to this mental model and trying to distill this into advice, although it will take me a moment to get to those.
#relationships #love

@arXiv_csRO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-25 09:36:32

G2S-ICP SLAM: Geometry-aware Gaussian Splatting ICP SLAM
Gyuhyeon Pak, Hae Min Cho, Euntai Kim
arxiv.org/abs/2507.18344 arxiv.org/pdf/2507.…

@arXiv_csCV_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-27 10:27:53

RoofSeg: An edge-aware transformer-based network for end-to-end roof plane segmentation
Siyuan You, Guozheng Xu, Pengwei Zhou, Qiwen Jin, Jian Yao, Li Li
arxiv.org/abs/2508.19003

@arXiv_csCR_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-27 09:49:02

A Tight Context-aware Privacy Bound for Histogram Publication
Sara Saeidian (KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Inria Saclay), Ata Yavuzy{\i}lmaz (KTH Royal Institute of Technology), Leonhard Grosse (KTH Royal Institute of Technology), Georg Schuppe (SEBx), Tobias J. Oechtering (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
arxiv.org/abs/2508…

@arXiv_csLG_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-10 11:02:29

Reinforcement Learning from Probabilistic Forecasts for Safe Decision-Making via Conditional Value-at-Risk Planning
Michal Koren, Or Peretz, Tai Dinh, Philip S. Yu
arxiv.org/abs/2510.08226

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-10 11:07:09

LeWiDi-2025 at NLPerspectives: The Third Edition of the Learning with Disagreements Shared Task
Elisa Leonardelli, Silvia Casola, Siyao Peng, Giulia Rizzi, Valerio Basile, Elisabetta Fersini, Diego Frassinelli, Hyewon Jang, Maja Pavlovic, Barbara Plank, Massimo Poesio
arxiv.org/abs/2510.08460

@arXiv_physicsappph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-07 09:16:04

X-ray thermal diffuse scattering as a texture-robust temperature diagnostic for dynamically compressed solids
P. G. Heighway, D. J. Peake, T. Stevens, J. S. Wark, B. Albertazzi, S. J. Ali, L. Antonelli, M. R. Armstrong, C. Baehtz, O. B. Ball, S. Banerjee, A. B. Belonoshko, C. A. Bolme, V. Bouffetier, R. Briggs, K. Buakor, T. Butcher, S. Di Dio Cafiso, V. Cerantola, J. Chantel, A. Di Cicco, A. L. Coleman, J. Collier, G. Collins, A. J. Comley, F. Coppari, T. E. Cowan, G. Cristoforetti, H…

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-10 07:52:58

IGUANA: Immersive Guidance, Navigation, and Control for Consumer UAV
Victor Victor, Tania Krisanty, Matthew McGinity, Stefan Gumhold, Uwe A{\ss}mann
arxiv.org/abs/2510.07609

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-08-11 13:30:26

Speculative politics
As an anarchist (okay, maybe not in practice), I'm tired of hearing why we have to suffer X and Y indignity to "preserve the rule of law" or "maintain Democratic norms." So here's an example of what representative democracy (a form of government that I believe is inherently flawed) could look like if its proponents had even an ounce of imagination, and/or weren't actively trying to rig it to favor a rich donor class:
1. Unicameral legislature, where representatives pass laws directly. Each state elects 3 statewide representatives: the three most-popular candidates in a statewide race where each person votes for one candidate (ranked preference voting would be even better but might not be necessary, and is not a solution by itself). Instead of each representative getting one vote in the chamber, they get N votes, where N is the number of people who voted for them. This means that in a close race, instead of the winner getting all the power, the power is split. Having 3 representatives trades off between leisure size and ensuring that two parties can't dominate together.
2. Any individual citizen can contact their local election office to switch or withdraw their vote at any time (maybe with a 3-day delay or something). Voting power of representatives can thus shift even without an election. They are limited to choosing one of the three elected representatives, or "none of the above." If the "none of the above" fraction exceeds 20% of eligible voters, a new election is triggered for that state. If turnout is less than 80%, a second election happens immediately, with results being final even at lower turnout until 6 months later (some better mechanism for turnout management might be needed).
3. All elections allow mail-in ballots, and in-person voting happens Sunday-Tuesday with the Monday being a mandatory holiday. (Yes, election integrity is not better in this system and that's a big weakness.)
4. Separate nationwide elections elect three positions for head-of-state: one with diplomatic/administrative powers, another with military powers, and a third with veto power. For each position, the top three candidates serve together, with only the first-place winner having actual power until vote switches or withdrawals change who that is. Once one of these heads loses their first-place status, they cannot get it again until another election, even if voters switch preferences back (to avoid dithering). An election for one of these positions is triggered when 20% have withdrawn their votes, or if all three people initially elected have been disqualified by losing their lead in the vote count.
5. Laws that involve spending money are packaged with specific taxes to pay for them, and may only be paid for by those specific revenues. Each tax may be opted into or out of by each taxpayer; where possible opting out of the tax also opts you out of the service. (I'm well aware of a lot of the drawbacks of this, but also feel like they'd not necessarily be worse than the drawbacks of our current system.) A small mandatory tax would cover election expenses.
6. I'm running out of attention, but similar multi-winner elections could elect panels of judges from which a subset is chosen randomly to preside in each case.
Now I'll point out once again that this system, in not directly confronting capitalism, racism, patriarchy, etc., is probably doomed to the same failures as our current system. But if you profess to want a "representative democracy" as opposed to something more libratory, I hope you'll at least advocate for something like this that actually includes meaningful representation as opposed to the current US system that's engineered to quash it.
Key questions: "Why should we have winner-take-all elections when winners-take-proportionately-to-votes is right there?" and "Why should elected officials get to ignore their constituents' approval except during elections, when vote-withdrawal or -switching is possible?"
2/2
#Democracy

@arXiv_csCV_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-25 10:33:02

CamPVG: Camera-Controlled Panoramic Video Generation with Epipolar-Aware Diffusion
Chenhao Ji, Chaohui Yu, Junyao Gao, Fan Wang, Cairong Zhao
arxiv.org/abs/2509.19979

@arXiv_eessSY_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-26 10:09:27

An Adaptive Environment-Aware Transformer Autoencoder for UAV-FSO with Dynamic Complexity Control
Han Zeng, Haibo Wang, Kan Wang, Xutao Yu, Zaichen Zhang
arxiv.org/abs/2508.16918

@arXiv_csSD_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-24 09:42:54

MECap-R1: Emotion-aware Policy with Reinforcement Learning for Multimodal Emotion Captioning
Haoqin Sun, Chenyang Lyu, Xiangyu Kong, Shiwan Zhao, Jiaming Zhou, Hui Wang, Aobo Kong, Jinghua Zhao, Longyue Wang, Weihua Luo, Kaifu Zhang, Yong Qin
arxiv.org/abs/2509.18729

@arXiv_csLG_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-27 10:28:43

C-Flat : Towards a More Efficient and Powerful Framework for Continual Learning
Wei Li, Hangjie Yuan, Zixiang Zhao, Yifan Zhu, Aojun Lu, Tao Feng, Yanan Sun
arxiv.org/abs/2508.18860

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-08-02 13:28:40

How to tell a vibe coder of lying when they say they check their code.
People who will admit to using LLMs to write code will usually claim that they "carefully check" the output since we all know that LLM code has a lot of errors in it. This is insufficient to address several problems that LLMs cause, including labor issues, digital commons stress/pollution, license violation, and environmental issues, but at least it's they are checking their code carefully we shouldn't assume that it's any worse quality-wise than human-authored code, right?
Well, from principles alone we can expect it to be worse, since checking code the AI wrote is a much more boring task than writing code yourself, so anyone who has ever studied human-computer interaction even a little bit can predict people will quickly slack off, stating to trust the AI way too much, because it's less work. I'm a different domain, the journalist who published an entire "summer reading list" full of nonexistent titles is a great example of this. I'm sure he also intended to carefully check the AI output, but then got lazy. Clearly he did not have a good grasp of the likely failure modes of the tool he was using.
But for vibe coders, there's one easy tell we can look for, at least in some cases: coding in Python without type hints. To be clear, this doesn't apply to novice coders, who might not be aware that type hints are an option. But any serious Python software engineer, whether they used type hints before or not, would know that they're an option. And if you know they're an option, you also know they're an excellent tool for catching code defects, with a very low effort:reward ratio, especially if we assume an LLM generates them. Of the cases where adding types requires any thought at all, 95% of them offer chances to improve your code design and make it more robust. Knowing about but not using type hints in Python is a great sign that you don't care very much about code quality. That's totally fine in many cases: I've got a few demos or jam games in Python with no type hints, and it's okay that they're buggy. I was never going to debug them to a polished level anyways. But if we're talking about a vibe coder who claims that they're taking extra care to check for the (frequent) LLM-induced errors, that's not the situation.
Note that this shouldn't be read as an endorsement of vibe coding for demos or other rough-is-acceptable code: the other ethical issues I skipped past at the start still make it unethical to use in all but a few cases (for example, I have my students use it for a single assignment so they can see for themselves how it's not all it's cracked up to be, and even then they have an option to observe a pre-recorded prompt session instead).

@arXiv_csRO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-03 10:04:01

Geometric Backstepping Control of Omnidirectional Tiltrotors Incorporating Servo-Rotor Dynamics for Robustness against Sudden Disturbances
Jaewoo Lee, Dongjae Lee, Jinwoo Lee, Hyungyu Lee, Yeonjoon Kim, H. Jin Kim
arxiv.org/abs/2510.01675

@arXiv_csCV_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-10-01 11:39:47

Cat: Post-training quantization error reduction via cluster-based affine transformation
Ali Zoljodi, Radu Timofte, Masoud Daneshtalab
arxiv.org/abs/2509.26277

@arXiv_csCL_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-27 10:18:13

Diverse And Private Synthetic Datasets Generation for RAG evaluation: A multi-agent framework
Ilias Driouich, Hongliu Cao, Eoin Thomas
arxiv.org/abs/2508.18929

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-01 09:32:51

Accessibility Scout: Personalized Accessibility Scans of Built Environments
William Huang, Xia Su, Jon E. Froehlich, Yang Zhang
arxiv.org/abs/2507.23190

@castarco@hachyderm.io
2025-09-02 21:13:59

Would you be interested on a European #coop alternative to #Github for your private/for-profit projects (paid service)?
I welcome comments elaborating on why you said "yes", "maybe" or "no" :blobfoxcofe: .
Note: I'm aware of other alternatives like Gitlab, Bitbucket, Gitea, Codeberg... None of those match what I'm asking about for one or more reasons.
#EU #SovereignTech #SovereignCloud #privacy #GDPR #cooperatives
No
Maybe
Yes