Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@scott@carfree.city
2025-06-06 01:04:57

This is so out of touch. ICE is ambushing and kidnapping our neighbors and we're going to "cover the entire city with drones"? The SFBOS should reject this "gift"
missionlocal.org/2025/06/were-

@memeorandum@universeodon.com
2025-06-06 08:31:00

EHRC commissioner calls for trans people to accept reduced rights (Peter Walker/The Guardian)
theguardian.com/society/2025/j
memeorandum.com/250606/p6#a250

@ruth_mottram@fediscience.org
2025-06-07 19:07:03

Anyone with experience on here driving an #EV around the French Alps? Problems finding chargers? ABRP looks like it's a bit thin on the ground for fast chargers? Maybe ok for trickle charge? Trying to work out if I dare rent an EV or should l stick to ICE for now (which I really don't like..). #askFedi
EDIT: update - thanks all for your helpful info, looks like it's easily possible even in the french Alps. Looking forward to my summer holidays!

@hieronymus@chaos.social
2025-05-06 03:42:08

ok, thou shall not let your Lilydeck lying around outside unsupervised.
how long do you let devices dry before re-charging them?
#AskFedi #Meshtastic

@DrPlanktonguy@ecoevo.social
2025-06-07 13:30:58

Weekend #Plankton Factoid 🦠🦐
The new Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite is crazy accurate. It can measure ocean altimetry to a mm, imaging internal waves and small sub eddies (rotating mixing zones). Tiny changes in height happen when water swirls (try it in a sink) with greater height at the edges due to centripetal force. These may be even more important for temperature &a…

image/jpeg a gold satellite with extended solar panels is shown in orbit around the earth. Image from NASA.
image/jpeg a visualization of currents off the eastern coast of North America shows hundreds of interconnected swirling eddies spinning in the Atlantic Ocean. Image from NASA.
@deprogrammaticaipsum@mas.to
2025-07-06 19:02:57

"On June 25th, 1999, Brian Foote published a seminal article that became, for a short while, one of the most commented pages of the early Internet, at least by struggling software developers and prospective architects. Such was the impact that it “was twice featured in Slashdot” (kids: that is the 1999 equivalent of “this article hit the homepage of Hacker News”). After almost 25 years since that publication, one question lingers: when are we going to accept defeat?"

@juer@juergenklute@digitalcourage.social
2025-06-06 11:29:11

Neue Studie zeigt: EU-Bürger akzeptieren keinen demokratischen Rückschritt. Untersuchungen und Experimente zeigen, dass eine Mehrheit der Befragten Maßnahmen der EU gegen Regierungen befürwortet, die gegen demokratische Normen verstoßen.
e…

@blakes7bot@mas.torpidity.net
2025-07-07 09:05:50

Series B, Episode 11 - Gambit
BLAKE: [V.O.] Bring us up, Avon.
AVON: Bringing you up now. [Operates teleport.] Welcome back. How did you get on?
CALLY: We managed to reach Docholli.
AVON: Oh, great. Wonderful. Terrific.
blake.torpidity.net/m/211/527 B7B2

@Mediagazer@mstdn.social
2025-06-07 01:06:13

Netflix shareholders voted to oust Jay Hoag, who's served on its board since 1999; Hoag offered his resignation and the board has 90 days to accept or reject it (Todd Spangler/Variety)
variety.com/2025/tv/news/netfl

@lysander07@sigmoid.social
2025-06-03 07:18:19

ESWC 2025 has just started with the presentation of the submission numbers to the individual tracks:
research track: 98 papers
resource track: 36 papers
in-use track: 22 papers
Looking forward to great presentations and discussions!
#eswc2025 #semweb

The image shows a presentation slide titled "Research Track in Numbers" displayed on a projector screen. The slide details the statistics of a research track, including the number of abstracts and full paper submissions, the acceptance rate, and the reviewing team's performance. It states that there were 125 abstracts and 98 full paper submissions, with 5 desk rejects and 26 accepted papers, representing a 26.5% acceptance rate. The reviewing team consisted of 23 Senior Program Committee (SPC) …
The image shows a presentation slide titled "In-Use Track in Numbers" displayed on a large screen. The slide contains bullet points with statistical information about the track. The first bullet point states that there were 22 abstracts and 22 full submissions, with 0 desk rejects and 8 accepted papers, which is 36.3% of the submissions, indicating a very competitive track. The second bullet point highlights the "Great reviewing team!" with 25 reviewers, 71 reviews in total, and an average of 3…
The image shows a presentation slide titled "Resource Track in Numbers" displayed on a large screen. The slide contains bullet points with numerical data. The first bullet point states "41 abstracts / 36 full submissions," with sub-points indicating "1 desk reject" and "11 accepted papers (30.6%)." The second bullet point is labeled "Reviewing" and includes "131 reviews," "10 SPC," and "52 reviewers." A person is standing at a podium to the left of the screen, wearing a green shirt and a lanyar…