
2025-06-21 16:55:34
Dallas Cowboys Coaching Staff: The Catalyst for Success in 2025 https://insidethestar.com/dallas-cowboys-coaching-staff-the-catalyst-for-success-in-2025
Dallas Cowboys Coaching Staff: The Catalyst for Success in 2025 https://insidethestar.com/dallas-cowboys-coaching-staff-the-catalyst-for-success-in-2025
Ethiopians Brew Success as Coffee and Cash Pile Up Thanks to Transformational Sustainable Forestry Program https://www.goodnewsnetwork.org/ethiopians-brew-success-as-coffee-and-cash-pile-up-thanks-to-sustainable-…
Travis Kelce opens up about returning to Chiefs, spurning retirement: 'Last year wasn't a success for me'
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/n…
Pro Ball Buddy Mindset | Mental Strategies For Basketball Success With Teige Morrell
Great Australian Pods Podcast Directory: https://www.greataustralianpods.com/pro-ball-buddy-mindset-mental-strategies-for-basketball-…
It all fits. Suppose you’re corporate leadership. You’re laying people off / refusing to hire because you have no clue what things will look like even 1 or 2 years in the future, and you are •terrified•.
Meanwhile, your investors, your gullible trend-chasing investors, are already mentally dividing companies into “pre-AI” and “post-AI.” And not only do you have no idea how to be “post-AI,” but you have no idea whether you’ll be solvent next year. What do you tell them?!??
Obviously you tell them you’re not hiring because you’re having such incredible success with AI! Maybe even you’re going to lay off all the senior people! They’ll love that!
Now you’re not failing and flailing — you’re leading the march into the future! Yay!
The full formula for the probability of "success" is:
p = {
1/(2^(-n 1)) if n is negative, or
1 - (1/(2^(n 1))) if n is zero or positive
}
(Both branches have the same value when n is 0, so the behavior is smooth around the origin.)
How can we tweak this?
First, we can introduce fixed success and/or failure chances unaffected by level, with this formula only taking effect if those don't apply. For example, you could do 10% failure, 80% by formula, and 10% success to keep things from being too sure either way even when levels are very high or low. On the other hand, this flattening makes the benefit of extra advantage levels even less exciting.
Second, we could allow for gradations of success/failure, and treat the coin pools I used to explain that math like dice pools a bit. An in-between could require linearly more success flips to achieve the next higher grade of success at each grade. For example, simple success on a crit role might mean dealing 1.5x damage, but if you succeed on 2 of your flips, you get 9/4 damage, or on 4 flips 27/8, or on 7 flips 81/16. In this world, stacking crit levels might be a viable build, and just giving up on armor would be super dangerous. In the particular case I was using this for just now, I can't easily do gradations of success (that's the reason I turned to probabilities in the first place) but I think I'd favor this approach when feasible.
The main innovation here over simple dice pools is how to handle situations where the number of dice should be negative. I'm almost certain it's not a truly novel innovation though, and some RPG fan can point out which system already does this (please actually do this, I'm an RPG nerd too at heart).
I'll leave this with one more tweak we could do: what if the number 2 in the probability equation were 3, or 2/3? I think this has a similar effect to just scaling all the modifiers a bit, but the algebra escapes me in this moment and I'm a bit lazy. In any case, reducing the base of the probability exponent should let you get a few more gradations near 50%, which is probably a good thing, since the default goes from 25% straight to 50% and then to 75% with no integer stops in between.
Our statement on the rise of #POX (party of xenophobes and fascists), the threat they pose, reasons for their success, strategies, good and bad, for countering them.
Steady State Manchester | For local prosperity, justice & ecological safety
The Army parade was a massive success (Christopher Tremoglie/Washington Examiner)
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/beltway-confidential/3444045/army-parade-was-massive-success/
http://www.memeorandum.com/250617/p53#a250617p53
'Can't Take You to a Black Department Store': Pastor Jamal Bryant Says He's 'Embarrassed' By the Success of the Target Boycott; Says Company Leaders Refused to Meet with Him
https://atlantablackstar.com/2025/06/17/pastor-jamal-bryant-says-hes-embarrassed-by-the-success-of-the-target-boycott-says-company-leaders-refused-to-meet/
Impact of a Deployed LLM Survey Creation Tool through the IS Success Model
Peng Jiang, Vinicius Cezar Monteiro de Lira, Antonio Maiorino
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14809
New Raiders LB Germaine Pratt Is No Stranger To Success Vs AFC West Clubs https://raiderramble.com/2025/06/16/new-raiders-lb-germaine-pratt-no-stranger-success-vs-afc-west/
Sixteen years ago today, the #OpenStreetMap #Philippines community 🇵🇭 held the first ever mapping party in the country. And our target was the picturesque city of #Tagaytay.
Theoretical Tensions in RLHF: Reconciling Empirical Success with Inconsistencies in Social Choice Theory
Jiancong Xiao, Zhekun Shi, Kaizhao Liu, Qi Long, Weijie J. Su
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.12350
SpaceXplode, am i right? 😉
(I do wish their next flight success 🤞)
#SpaceX
I asked people what they think about working with me, here's what they said!
#Social #Design #Illustration #Portfolio
Dallas Cowboys new addition will be 'major piece' to success, NFL personnel man says https://www.si.com/nfl/cowboys/news/dallas-cowboys-new-addition-will-be-major-piece-to-success-nfl-personnel-man-says…
Why AI can't possibly make you more productive; long
#AI and "productivity", some thoughts:
Productivity is a concept that isn't entirely meaningless outside the context of capitalism, but it's a concept that is heavily inflected in a capitalist context. In many uses today it effectively means "how much you can satisfy and/or exceed your boss' expectations." This is not really what it should mean: even in an anarchist utopia, people would care about things like how many shirts they can produce in a week, although in an "I'd like to voluntarily help more people" way rather than an "I need to meet this quota to earn my survival" way. But let's roll with this definition for a second, because it's almost certainly what your boss means when they say "productivity", and understanding that word in a different (even if truer) sense is therefore inherently dangerous.
Accepting "productivity" to mean "satisfying your boss' expectations," I will now claim: the use of generative AI cannot increase your productivity.
Before I dive in, it's imperative to note that the big generative models which most people think of as constituting "AI" today are evil. They are 1: pouring fuel on our burning planet, 2: psychologically strip-mining a class of data laborers who are exploited for their precarity, 3: enclosing, exploiting, and polluting the digital commons, and 4: stealing labor from broad classes of people many of whom are otherwise glad to give that labor away for free provided they get a simple acknowledgement in return. Any of these four "ethical issues" should be enough *alone* to cause everyone to simply not use the technology. These ethical issues are the reason that I do not use generative AI right now, except for in extremely extenuating circumstances. These issues are also convincing for a wide range of people I talk to, from experts to those with no computer science background. So before I launch into a critique of the effectiveness of generative AI, I want to emphasize that such a critique should be entirely unnecessary.
But back to my thesis: generative AI cannot increase your productivity, where "productivity" has been defined as "how much you can satisfy and/or exceed your boss' expectations."
Why? In fact, what the fuck? Every AI booster I've met has claimed the opposite. They've given me personal examples of time saved by using generative AI. Some of them even truly believe this. Sometimes I even believe they saved time without horribly compromising on quality (and often, your boss doesn't care about quality anyways if the lack of quality is hard to measure of doesn't seem likely to impact short-term sales/feedback/revenue). So if generative AI genuinely lets you write more emails in a shorter period of time, or close more tickets, or something else along these lines, how can I say it isn't increasing your ability to meet your boss' expectations?
The problem is simple: your boss' expectations are not a fixed target. Never have been. In virtue of being someone who oversees and pays wages to others under capitalism, your boss' game has always been: pay you less than the worth of your labor, so that they can accumulate profit and this more capital to remain in charge instead of being forced into working for a wage themselves. Sure, there are layers of manservant caught in between who aren't fully in this mode, but they are irrelevant to this analysis. It matters not how much you please your manager if your CEO thinks your work is not worth the wages you are being paid. And using AI actively lowers the value of your work relative to your wages.
Why do I say that? It's actually true in several ways. The most obvious: using generative AI lowers the quality of your work, because the work it produces is shot through with errors, and when your job is reduced to proofreading slop, you are bound to tire a bit, relax your diligence, and let some mistakes through. More than you would have if you are actually doing and taking pride in the work. Examples are innumerable and frequent, from journalists to lawyers to programmers, and we laugh at them "haha how stupid to not check whether the books the AI reviewed for you actually existed!" but on a deeper level if we're honest we know we'd eventually make the same mistake ourselves (bonus game: spot the swipe-typing typos I missed in this post; I'm sure there will be some).
But using generative AI also lowers the value of your work in another much more frightening way: in this era of hype, it demonstrates to your boss that you could be replaced by AI. The more you use it, and no matter how much you can see that your human skills are really necessary to correct its mistakes, the more it appears to your boss that they should hire the AI instead of you. Or perhaps retain 10% of the people in roles like yours to manage the AI doing the other 90% of the work. Paradoxically, the *more* you get done in terms of raw output using generative AI, the more it looks to your boss as if there's an opportunity to get enough work done with even fewer expensive humans. Of course, the decision to fire you and lean more heavily into AI isn't really a good one for long-term profits and success, but the modern boss did not get where they are by considering long-term profits. By using AI, you are merely demonstrating your redundancy, and the more you get done with it, the more redundant you seem.
In fact, there's even a third dimension to this: by using generative AI, you're also providing its purveyors with invaluable training data that allows them to make it better at replacing you. It's generally quite shitty right now, but the more use it gets by competent & clever people, the better it can become at the tasks those specific people use it for. Using the currently-popular algorithm family, there are limits to this; I'm not saying it will eventually transcend the mediocrity it's entwined with. But it can absolutely go from underwhelmingly mediocre to almost-reasonably mediocre with the right training data, and data from prompting sessions is both rarer and more useful than the base datasets it's built on.
For all of these reasons, using generative AI in your job is a mistake that will likely lead to your future unemployment. To reiterate, you should already not be using it because it is evil and causes specific and inexcusable harms, but in case like so many you just don't care about those harms, I've just explained to you why for entirely selfish reasons you should not use it.
If you're in a position where your boss is forcing you to use it, my condolences. I suggest leaning into its failures instead of trying to get the most out of it, and as much as possible, showing your boss very clearly how it wastes your time and makes things slower. Also, point out the dangers of legal liability for its mistakes, and make sure your boss is aware of the degree to which any of your AI-eager coworkers are producing low-quality work that harms organizational goals.
Also, if you've read this far and aren't yet of an anarchist mindset, I encourage you to think about the implications of firing 75% of (at least the white-collar) workforce in order to make more profit while fueling the climate crisis and in most cases also propping up dictatorial figureheads in government. When *either* the AI bubble bursts *or* if the techbros get to live out the beginnings of their worker-replacement fantasies, there are going to be an unimaginable number of economically desperate people living in increasingly expensive times. I'm the kind of optimist who thinks that the resulting social crucible, though perhaps through terrible violence, will lead to deep social changes that effectively unseat from power the ultra-rich that continue to drag us all down this destructive path, and I think its worth some thinking now about what you might want the succeeding stable social configuration to look like so you can advocate towards that during points of malleability.
As others have said more eloquently, generative AI *should* be a technology that makes human lives on average easier, and it would be were it developed & controlled by humanists. The only reason that it's not, is that it's developed and controlled by terrible greedy people who use their unfairly hoarded wealth to immiserate the rest of us in order to maintain their dominance. In the long run, for our very survival, we need to depose them, and I look forward to what the term "generative AI" will mean after that finally happens.
Some statistics about all robotic #LunarLanding attempts so far from 1965 to 2025 compiled from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_missions_to_the_Moon and https://scicomm.xyz/@AkaSci@fosstodon.org/114636519291241321 in which I only count those for which descent to the surface had been initiated, not missions lost at launch or on the way - in a nutshell ~70% of all landings by government agencies went well (essentially the same rate 60 years ago and now!) but only ~30% by private companies. Here goes ...
There have been two separate periods of soft lunar landing attempts of ca. a dozen years each, from 1965 to 1976 and 2013 to 2025 (ongoing) with a huge gap between them.
In the first interval there were 20 attempts with 13 successes (Luna 9, 13, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21 and 24 and Surveyor 1, 3, 5, 6 and 7), one partial success (Luna 23, counting as 50%) and 6 failures (Luna 5, 7, 8, 15 and 18 and Surveyor 4), so the success rate was 13.5/20 = 68 %. All missions were by - the Soviet and U.S. - governments.
In the second interval there were so far 14 attempts with 6 full successes (Chang'e-3, 4, 5 and 6, Vikram 2 and Blue Ghost), three partial successes (SLIM, IM-1 and 2, counting as 75%, 50% and 25%, respectively) and 5 failures (Beresheet, Vikram 1, Hakuto-R 1 and 2 and Luna 25) so the success rate was 7.5 / 14 = 54%.
But looking only at the government missions it was 72%, slighly up from 50 years ago. While for the commercial attempts it was only 29%. In total the success rate was 19 (18 government-run) missions out of 34 (28) attempts or 62% but 69% for governments only. And if you throw in the 6 Apollo landings, the total success rate rises to 68% and the government-only rate goes even up to 75%.
Next-User Retrieval: Enhancing Cold-Start Recommendations via Generative Next-User Modeling
Yu-Ting Lan, Yang Huo, Yi Shen, Xiao Yang, Zuotao Liu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15267 …
Optimizing Length Compression in Large Reasoning Models
Zhengxiang Cheng, Dongping Chen, Mingyang Fu, Tianyi Zhou
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14755 https://…
Watching the livestream of what we can all do next after #NoKings protests success on Saturday.
(YouTube link, should work for a replay after the livestream completes too.)
https://www.youtube.com/live/ECEbs-zOfdc
A Variational Framework for Improving Naturalness in Generative Spoken Language Models
Li-Wei Chen, Takuya Higuchi, Zakaria Aldeneh, Ahmed Hussen Abdelaziz, Alexander Rudnicky
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14767
Demonstrating Multi-Suction Item Picking at Scale via Multi-Modal Learning of Pick Success
Che Wang, Jeroen van Baar, Chaitanya Mitash, Shuai Li, Dylan Randle, Weiyao Wang, Sumedh Sontakke, Kostas E. Bekris, Kapil Katyal
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.10359
This https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12638 has been replaced.
initial toot: https://mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_qbi…
Weak TransNet: A Petrov-Galerkin based neural network method for solving elliptic PDEs
Zhihang Xu, Min Wang, Zhu Wang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14812 http…
The Pitfalls and Potentials of Adding Gene-invariance to Optimal Mixing
Anton Bouter, Dirk Thierens, Peter A. N. Bosman
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15222 ht…
Asymptotically Smaller Encodings for Graph Problems and Scheduling
Bernardo Subercaseaux
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14042 https://arx…
MLDebugging: Towards Benchmarking Code Debugging Across Multi-Library Scenarios
Jinyang Huang, Xiachong Feng, Qiguang Chen, Hanjie Zhao, Zihui Cheng, Jiesong Bai, Jingxuan Zhou, Min Li, Libo Qin
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13824
We all perform tasks in our day-to-day work that are considered 'non-promotable' – these are crucial for project success, but they won't get you promoted. This is commonly known as 'glue work', a term coined by Tanya Reilly. Join Fatima Taj at this year's Berlin Buzzwords as she shares her personal experience of narrowly avoiding the trap of being permanently stuck with glue work, and explains how to handle similar situations.
Learn more:
ViSTA: Visual Storytelling using Multi-modal Adapters for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
Sibo Dong, Ismail Shaheen, Maggie Shen, Rupayan Mallick, Sarah Adel Bargal
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.12198
Stephen Miller is becoming a victim of his own success (Hayes Brown/MSNBC)
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/stephen-miller-ice-deportation-rcna213491
http://www.memeorandum.com/250618/p26#a250618p26
BraTS orchestrator : Democratizing and Disseminating state-of-the-art brain tumor image analysis
Florian Kofler, Marcel Rosier, Mehdi Astaraki, Ujjwal Baid, Hendrik M\"oller, Josef A. Buchner, Felix Steinbauer, Eva Oswald, Ezequiel de la Rosa, Ivan Ezhov, Constantin von See, Jan Kirschke, Anton Schmick, Sarthak Pati, Akis Linardos, Carla Pitarch, Sanyukta Adap, Jeffrey Rudie, Maria Correia de Verdier, Rachit Saluja, Evan Calabrese, Dominic LaBella, Mariam Aboian, Ahmed W. Moawad, …
Why not download an app and go through a digital identity verification process to... have quick access to your National Insurance number?
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/be-summer-job-ready-with-the-hmrc-app
nice quote from Vivek Murthy
(interviewed by Eric Topol)
"... a triad of success ... a triad of fulfillment.
"... how does society define success for you? And they would tell me some version of money, fame, and power. If you had all three of those, then you really hit the lottery and people will write books about you, make documentaries about you, you'll have made it. But ... The triad to fulfillment is rooted in relationships, service, and purpose"
#life #success
Things to watch every 6 months
#mastodonadmin
Understanding multi-fidelity training of machine-learned force-fields
John L. A. Gardner, Hannes Schulz, Jean Helie, Lixin Sun, Gregor N. C. Simm
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14963 …
An Atomic Cluster Expansion Potential for Twisted Multilayer Graphene
Yangshuai Wang, Drake Clark, Sambit Das, Ziyan Zhu, Daniel Massatt, Vikram Gavini, Mitchell Luskin, Christoph Ortner
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15061
The Future of Solar modelling: requirements for a new generation of solar models
Gael Buldgen, Gloria. Canocchi, Arthur. Le Saux, Vladimir A. Baturin, Regner Trampedach, Anna V. Oreshina, Sergey V. Ayukov, Anil Pradhan, Jean-Christophe Pain, Masanobu Kunitomo, Thierry Appourchaux, Rafael A. Garcia, Morgan Deal, Nicolas Grevesse, Arlette Noels, Joergen Christensen-Dalsgaard, Tristan Guillot, Devesh Nandal, J\'er\^ome B\'etrisey, Christophe Blancard, James Colgan, Philippe Coss\&…
InverTune: Removing Backdoors from Multimodal Contrastive Learning Models via Trigger Inversion and Activation Tuning
Mengyuan Sun, Yu Li, Yuchen Liu, Bo Du, Yunjie Ge
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.12411
So the basic idea is that we first compute a "level" for whatever interaction, by adding beneficial modifiers and subtracting harmful ones. Imagine most modifiers are smallish integers like 2 or -3 (though they can be non-integers too). Each level can be thought of as making things twice as good/bad, although this only applies directly when they're balanced. The actual formula starts with a 50/50 chance of "success" at level 0, and then each positive level halves the chance of failure, or if the levels are negative, each negative level halves the chance of success (note that halving the chance of failure is not the same as doubling the chance of success).
The intuitive explanation is that you start with a coin flip. Then if the level is positive, you flip that many additional coins and succeed if any single coin succeeds, but it the level is negative, you have to flip that many additional coins and succeed only if *all* flips succeed.
For example, if I have a dagger with 5 crit chance, and I attack an opponent with no armor modifiers, I'd have to win any 1 of 6 coin flips to score a crit (p = 1 - (1/(2^6)) = 63/64. Increasing my crit modifier by 1 ups my chances only slightly, to 127/128. This is obviously pretty poor return, indicating that the 5 I already have is very strong. If the opponent had armor with -3 to crits, the interaction is now level 2, so the crit chance is 7/8, which is still pretty good. We can see from these examples that the basic system
rewards a small level advantage a lot, but the rewards diminish rapidly. The system has a few avenues for tweaking how it works though, that can let us modify this. There's also a potential benefit (though sometimes drawback) that no matter what the level gap, there's an effective limit to how much the interaction swings.
Belief propagation for networks with loops: The neighborhoods-intersections-based method
Pedro Hack
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13791 https://
Nick Chubb to Texans: Can former All-Pro rusher continue success of RBs going to new teams post-ACL injury?
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/n…
Towards Employing FPGA and ASIP Acceleration to Enable Onboard AI/ML in Space Applications
Vasileios Leon, George Lentaris, Dimitrios Soudris, Simon Vellas, Mathieu Bernou
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.12970
ChromFound: Towards A Universal Foundation Model for Single-Cell Chromatin Accessibility Data
Yifeng Jiao, Yuchen Liu, Yu Zhang, Xin Guo, Yushuai Wu, Chen Jiang, Jiyang Li, Hongwei Zhang, Limei Han, Xin Gao, Yuan Qi, Yuan Cheng
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12638
Med-REFL: Medical Reasoning Enhancement via Self-Corrected Fine-grained Reflection
Zongxian Yang, Jiayu Qian, Zegao Peng, Haoyu Zhang, Zhi-An Huang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13793
Wahey! Success on my Javastation Krups, this is a Debian Sarge debootstrapped userspace running over NFS.
#retrocomputing
Nexus of Team Collaboration Stability on Mega Construction Project Success in Electric Vehicle Manufacturing Enterprises: The Moderating Role of Human-AI Integration
Jun Cui
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06375
Balkonkraftwerk is the German success story of plug-in solar energy (one or two solar panels, inverter with 🔌), which can be self-installed by apartment dwellers and has democratised solar energy. There are now officially over one million of these installations in Germany.
(cartoon ©️ Til Mette)
https://www.…
3 sleepers critical to Cowboys success this season https://insidethestar.com/3-sleepers-critical-to-cowboys-success-this-season
The right wing threat and a viable future
A statement from Steady State Manchester Introduction With horror we see the electoral success of POX, The party of Xenophobes and Fascists (which, without irony, actually calls itself Reform UK1). In the May election round they gained 677 more councillors, took control of 8 councils, landed a regional Mayor and gained another MP, in a formerly safe Labour seat.
I don’t want to dwell •too• much on the shadenfreude of Trump’s pitiful parade, but I do think it’s worth just taking this in:
Trump’s political success has always hinged on him knowing how to be a reality TV star, knowing better than the news orgs themselves that political “news” is in fact reality TV, knowing how to manipulate that reality TV show.
And today, he failed at that completely. His reality show sucked. The news of the day just ran right over him. https://kolektiva.social/@Voline/114685755430626127
#generativeAI experiment : for the page of software package, I am trying to generate a woman computer vision scientist in a superman costume...
I tried different ways to force the generated images to depict a woman, but with no success : I only get the same male scientist!
Know What You Don't Know: Uncertainty Calibration of Process Reward Models
Young-Jin Park, Kristjan Greenewald, Kaveh Alim, Hao Wang, Navid Azizan
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09338
A weaponized AI chatbot is flooding Canadian city councils with climate misinformation, and already having some 'success'.
https://www.nationalobserver.com/2025/05/28/investigations/weaponized-ai-chatbot-…
Limiting distributions of ratios of Binomial random variables
Adriel Barretto, Zachary Lubberts
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13071 https://
What Drives Team Success? Large-Scale Evidence on the Role of the Team Player Effect
Nico Elbert, Alicia von Schenk, Fabian Kosse, Victor Klockmann, Nikolai Stein, Christoph Flath
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04475
YouTube releases its 2024 US Impact Report, which says YouTube's creative ecosystem contributed $55B to US GDP in 2024 and supported 490K full-time jobs (Alexandra Veitch/YouTube Official Blog)
https://blog.youtube/news-and-events/2024-us-youtube-impact-re…
How oxygen influences the catalytic activity of iron during carbon nanotube nucleation
Ben McLean, Alister J. Page, Feng Ding
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11632
OH – food for thought: “They've found ways to be successful critics – emphasis on successful. They get invited to conferences, win awards, maintain influence … that success might come from never truly threatening the system.
Maybe aggressive rhetoric and a bridge-burning approach isn’t a bug but a feature. When the house is on fire, you don’t negotiate with the arsonists about fire safety regulations. You sound the alarm, loudly and repeatedly.
In a truly existential fight, w…
Kelce 'only interested' in SB rings, not AFC bling https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/45539848/chiefs-travis-kelce-only-interested-super-bowl-rings
Trash panda update: Didn't set any more boobytraps. Sprinkled cayenne pepper powder along a bunch of their travel routes (but not fully ringing the yard) which didn't seem to do a whole lot. Maybe they just walked around it, or I need to use more? I'll try doing the entire fence line tonight and see if it's more effective if I make sure not to leave any gaps.
I tried the nerf gun for what I think will probably be the last time. Shot at one of them and the cheeky bugger …
Alphabet Index Mapping: Jailbreaking LLMs through Semantic Dissimilarity
Bilal Saleh Husain
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.12685 https://…
Our new statement on the rise of #POX (party of xenophobes and fascists), the threat they pose, reasons for their success, strategies, good and bad, for countering them.
Steady State Manchester | For local prosperity, justice & ecological safety
Of *course* they did. And it's beyond ironic that the SBC has someone labeled an "ethicist" who's focused on this instead of fixing the sex abuse problem the conference has. #Obergefell
This is really great and will only increase the success of this AI tool. I can recommend NotebookLM, try it.
https://www.theverge.com/news/678915/google-notebooklm-share-public-link
This https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01997 has been replaced.
initial toot: https://mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_csLG_…
Las Vegas Raiders celebrate success of 5th annual INSPIRE event held at Intermountain Health Performance Center, presented by Allegiant https://www.raiders.com/news/las-vegas-rai
Ising versus infinite randomness criticality in arrays of Rydberg atoms trapped with non-perfect tweezers
Jose Soto-Garcia, Natalia Chepiga
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11985
Learning to Optimize Package Picking for Large-Scale, Real-World Robot Induction
Shuai Li, Azarakhsh Keipour, Sicong Zhao, Srinath Rajagopalan, Charles Swan, Kostas E. Bekris
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09765
Exploiting the Exact Denoising Posterior Score in Training-Free Guidance of Diffusion Models
Gregory Bellchambers
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13614 https://…
Russell Wilson says Giants drafting Jaxson Dart 'doesn't change anything at all,' veteran focused on 'success'
https://www.cb…
Las Vegas Raiders celebrate success of 5th annual INSPIRE event held at Intermountain Health Performance Center, presented by Allegiant https://www.raiders.com/news/las-vegas-rai
A look at the Salt Lake Tribune under CEO and top editor Lauren Gustus, who is spearheading a campaign to raise $1M in 2025 to end its paywall (Rick Edmonds/Poynter)
https://www.poynter.org/business-work/2025/salt-lake-tribune-paywal…
Deep Symmetric Autoencoders from the Eckart-Young-Schmidt Perspective
Simone Brivio, Nicola Rares Franco
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11641 https://
Trump is frustrated by his own success on immigration (Eric Levitz/Vox)
https://www.vox.com/politics/416526/la-protests-trump-ice-deportations-border-crossings
http://www.memeorandum.com/250612/p15#a250612p15
Text-Aware Image Restoration with Diffusion Models
Jaewon Min, Jin Hyeon Kim, Paul Hyunbin Cho, Jaeeun Lee, Jihye Park, Minkyu Park, Sangpil Kim, Hyunhee Park, Seungryong Kim
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09993
Variational Learning Finds Flatter Solutions at the Edge of Stability
Avrajit Ghosh, Bai Cong, Rio Yokota, Saiprasad Ravishankar, Rongrong Wang, Molei Tao, Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan, Thomas M\"ollenhoff
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.12903
How an up-and-coming NFL agent (in Minneapolis!) finds his footing in a cut-throat league https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6415008/2025/06/17/nfl-agent-minnesota-vikings-minneapolis-jonathan-allen/
This https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01754 has been replaced.
link: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=a
This https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18344 has been replaced.
initial toot: https://mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_csLG_…
Patriots All-Quarter Century Team: Tom Brady, Bill Belichick and Rob Gronkowski headline dynastic run
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/patriot
SAFE: Multitask Failure Detection for Vision-Language-Action Models
Qiao Gu, Yuanliang Ju, Shengxiang Sun, Igor Gilitschenski, Haruki Nishimura, Masha Itkina, Florian Shkurti
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09937
3 most important Dallas Cowboys on defense not named Micah Parsons https://www.si.com/nfl/cowboys/news/3-most-important-dallas-cowboys-on-defense-not-named-micah-parsons
SOFT: Selective Data Obfuscation for Protecting LLM Fine-tuning against Membership Inference Attacks
Kaiyuan Zhang, Siyuan Cheng, Hanxi Guo, Yuetian Chen, Zian Su, Shengwei An, Yuntao Du, Charles Fleming, Ashish Kundu, Xiangyu Zhang, Ninghui Li
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.10424
Bills WR Keon Coleman gives harsh self-assessment of rookie season: 'When that (expletive) trash, you got to be better' https://www.nfl.com/news/bills-wr-keon-coleman-gives-harsh-self-assessment-of-rookie-season-yo…
4 most important Dallas Cowboys on offense not named Dak Prescott or Ceedee Lamb https://www.si.com/nfl/cowboys/news/4-most-important-dallas-cowboys-on-offense-not-named-dak-prescott-or-ceedee-lamb
Logarithmic Smoothing for Adaptive PAC-Bayesian Off-Policy Learning
Maxime Haddouche, Otmane Sakhi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.10664 https://
TooBadRL: Trigger Optimization to Boost Effectiveness of Backdoor Attacks on Deep Reinforcement Learning
Songze Li, Mingxuan Zhang, Oubo Ma, Kang Wei, Shouling Ji
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09562
Cowboys' Dak Prescott labeled NFL's 'worst' in unfortunate category https://www.si.com/nfl/cowboys/news/dallas-cowboys-dak-prescott-labeled-nfl-worst-unfortunate-category
Mailbag: Position that needs to improve most? https://www.dallascowboys.com/news/mailbag-position-that-needs-to-improve-most
16 players to trade for or trade away in dynasty leagues https://www.espn.com/fantasy/football/story/_/id/45478615/2025-fantasy-football-trade-targets-dynasty
Mailbag: Position that needs to improve most? https://www.dallascowboys.com/news/mailbag-position-that-needs-to-improve-most
Dak Prescott makes goal clear about Dallas Cowboys, NFL legacy https://www.si.com/nfl/cowboys/news/dak-prescott-makes-goal-clear-about-dallas-cowboys-nfl-legacy