Tootfinder

The Agora Assistant got this one "wrong" about #2025 but I'm here for it

"I think it is a huge mistake for people to assume that they can trust AI when they do not trust each other. The safest way to develop superintelligence is to first strengthen trust between humans, and then cooperate with each other to develop superintelligence in a safe manner. But what we are doing now is exactly the opposite. Instead, all efforts are being directed toward developing a superintelligence."
#AGI #AI
https://www.wired.com/story/questions-answered-by-yuval-noah-harari-for-wired-ai-artificial-intelligence-singularity/

Any second now... #LLM #AGI #GenAI #AI

Google’s AI Chief on the State of Artificial Intelligence (New York Times, 23 May 2025)
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/23/podcasts/google-ai-demis-hassabi…

Google DeepMind’s Demis Hassabis on AGI, Innovation and More
Demis Hassabis, the chief executive of Google DeepMind, says that “we’re quite close” to human-level artificial intelligence. After that, all bets are off.

Irgendwie passend: Die eugenische MAHA-Politik von RFK wird mutmaßlich* mit Technologie gerechtfertigt, die teilweise auf eugenische Ideen zurückgreift (LLMs, die ein Schritt zur AGI sein wollen).
*) So wie die nicht existierenden Studien beschrieben sind, klingt es nach einem LLM-Output.
https://archive.is/MnAxG

"Wenn ich träumen könnte, ist eine Welt, in der wir AGI haben, eine Welt des Überflusses."
So der #OpenAI Chef von #ChatGPT. Jazz, Lyrik, Imkern gar?
Kapitalismus ist Exzess. Der befreiende, strotzende Überfluss muss gegen AI arbeiten.

The more time goes on, the more conflicted I get about #AI. (or, more specifically, generative AI. I like causal AI a fair bit)
On one hand, I hate so much about it:
the needless environmental and electronic parts waste, the impact on labor, the monopolistic nature of main organizations driving it, the endless conversations about AGI and other absurdly utopian (or dystopian) futures, the widespread theft of IP and human work, the devaluation of labor and craft… so much of it is not okay at all.
On the other hand, I kinda get it?
I like to test software for myself, so I've been dipping my toes into some popular AI tools over the past couple of years. I have a paid subscription to ChatGPT (which I don’t feel great about, I know), and I have found genuine utility in it.
More so, I feel so conflicted when I talk to people I respect and who I think are very smart and creative and they tell me how in love they are with all of these AI tools, about the complex workflows they build, about their experiments with agentic AI and integrations... These people seem so excited, so alive, so joyous about the things that this technology allows them to do. They often wouldn't have had the skills / knowledge / financial capital to do some of those things with human efforts alone. And now I see them coding their own tools, doing complex data analysis, trying creative experiments with graphics / text / video...
And I feel like a total jerk going "BUT ACTUALLY THIS IS UNETHICAL AND INEFFICIENT AND YOU SHOULD STOP IT BECAUSE AI SUCKS".
The technology behind all these gen AI models does have real utility, and it has kicked off a lot of creativity from people who wouldn't have dabbled in those kinds of projects otherwise.
So I don't know how to feel. Because I can't let go of the guilt and the real problems and the awareness of how much empty hype there is.
#technology #artificialintelligence #genAI #ChatGPT