
2025-06-11 11:39:44
Uh, World Bank, solar?
World Bank Lifts Ban on Nuclear Power, Considers Upstream Gas | Financial Post
https://financialpost.com/pmn/business-pmn/world-bank-lifts-ban-on-nuclear-power-considers-upstream-gas
I don’t agree in one respect:
Neither OOP nor FP (nor 4GLs nor IDEs nor SOAs nor any of the other new hotnesses past) had anything remotely resembling the current money behind them. None led to companies speculatively laying off tens of thousands of employees for imagined productivity boosts that had not actually arrived yet. None shaped whole election cycles, or led to national proposals for preemptive deregulation. None led to the construction of nuclear power plants or the draining of rivers. None sent oligarchs or fascists into spasmodic wet dreams of world domination. None started quasi-religious cults like EA.
All •that• is the part that feels like blockchain — but even worse, if such a thing is possible.
@…
2/2
£13.2bn fund to fix draughty homes and install heat pumps and solar panels.
Nothing else that I can see on reduction of energy demand.
And here is the money being wasted:
'£30bn in investment in nuclear power, about half on the Sizewell C reactor'
Small tidal schemes in the Mersey, Severn and other estuaries would give a better, and safer, approach to "always on" energy supply.
Revealing Dark Matter's Role in Neutron Stars Anisotropy: A Bayesian Approach Using Multi-messenger Observations
Xue-Zhi Liu, Premachand Mahapatra, Chun Huang, Ayush Hazarika, Chiranjeeb Singha, Prasanta Kumar Das
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08376
Meta agrees to acquire power from Constellation's operating Illinois nuclear plant, in a 20-year deal starting in mid-2027 when a state subsidy expires (Bloomberg)
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/20
Iran's Khamenei dismisses US nuclear proposal, vows to keep enriching uranium (Reuters)
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/irans-supreme-leader-says-us-nuclear-proposal-undermines-its-national-power-2025-06-04/
http://www.memeorandum.com/250604/p44#a250604p44
Adam Bandt
That tiny Bandt
With his atomic power
Would have been so much funnier if he was the one spruiking nuclear energy.
#auspol
More depressing news as governments swallow propaganda from the nuclear power lobby.
Renewables won't deliver the power currently used, and projected, but nor will nuclear, which also depends on fossil fuels, uses a scarce and diminishing resource, and leaves a toxic legacy for which there is no adequate solution.
The only solution is radical energy descent.
Tide is turning in Europe and beyond in favour of nuclear power | Nuclear power | The Guardian
No sign Russia is preparing to restart Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, Reuters reports: https://benborges.xyz/2025/05/29/no-sign-russia-is-preparing.html
Companies are pursuing small nuclear reactors to power their data centers, and I can't see how anything could go wrong with that
UK-Regierung worst 14 Milliarden Pfund zum Fenster hinaus.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/jun/10/sizewell-c-nuclear-power-station-ed-miliband-investment?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
Investment Risk for Energy Infrastructure Construction Is Highest for #NuclearPower Plants, Lowest for #Solar
"Meta signs deal with nuclear plant to power AI and datacenters for 20 years"
#Meta #Facebook #AI #ArtificialIntelligence
Why do so many people completely ignore the fact that human error (and human “error”) and negligence exist when talking about how great and safe nuclear energy is?
Sure, you can make super secure nuclear power plants and super resistant containers for waste storage and take selfies hugging those containers all you want, but all it takes is one idiot to want to cut corners and boom you have nuclear waste hanging around in the nature without proper storage.
It’s not like PA has any history of needing such alarms… https://epistolary.org/@vees/114616119029931607
I don't usually get involved in the pro/anti nuclear discussion, but whenever people say "we need nuclear because renewables aren't reliable enough", do they usually take into account how much energy storage you can buy for the price of one nuclear power plant?
Nuclear Quantum Many-Body Dynamics: From Collective Vibrations to Heavy-Ion Collisions (2nd edition)
C\'edric Simenel
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04261 …
Anisotropic superconducting gap probed by $^{125}$Te NMR in noncentrosymmetric Sc$_6M$Te$_2$ ($M$ = Fe, Co)
Kanako Doi, Hayase Takei, Yusaku Shinoda, Yoshihiko Okamoto, Daigorou Hirai, Koshi Takenaka, Taku Matsushita, Yoshiaki Kobayashi, Yasuhiro Shimizu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.02484 …
This type of reasoning is always baffling to me. When climate change is discussed these people always say that there is some magical technological solution that will pop up to save us (usually handed to us by the AI gods).
Why then, in the the several decades that it takes to scale up nuclear, can we not account for the possibility that AI could become more energy efficient?
That sounds like something you could solve for the cost of a few power plants...
This https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11648 has been replaced.
initial toot: https://mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_nuc…
New level density parameter beyond Egidy-Bucurescu's systematics
Junzhe Zhang, Yanan Zheng, Caixin Yuan, Yangyang Shen, Yingchen Mao
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.02322