Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

@grumpybozo@toad.social
2025-07-17 20:36:23

Calm down…
Despite the obnoxious footers you sometimes see on email written by the silly, no one can obligate you to protect data that they sent to you without some sort of contract. Maybe if you’re an employee, you have made an explicit agreement to protect your employer’s data. Maybe there is an implied agreement to protect information of your employer’s business partners. But there is NO blanket duty of care for email sent to you any more than there is for snail mail.

@UP8@mastodon.social
2025-07-18 16:14:08

♻️ Why recycling solar panels is harder than you might think − an electrical engineer explains
theconversation.com/why-recycl

@pavelasamsonov@mastodon.social
2025-08-17 21:08:30

But doctor, you are Pagliacci!

Google search for "all you can eat buffet near me" with an "ai overview" of the results saying that you can use Google to search "all you can eat buffet near me" to find a buffet.
@peter_mcmahan@mas.to
2025-07-17 23:27:59

This is a really well thought-out survey on redesigns for an updated autistic pride flag! I believe it's open to everyone but obviously the input of autistic and neurodivergent people is especially significant. (I also like this survey because it takes the possible overlap with the Metis flag seriously)
Symbols matter, so consider contributing!
#autism

@unchartedworlds@scicomm.xyz
2025-08-18 13:13:25
Content warning: good analysis of "age verification" practicalities / risks

Really good clear explanation from @…, laying out various problems and risks with trying to implement "age verification" online.
"Firstly, in order to prove your age you’re being asked to hand over some fairly important personal details. ... Usually the company you’re handing these details to is a third party, often one you will never have heard of before. ...
"The data that is being collected for age verification purposes is extremely tempting to hackers ... and at the moment there is no specific regulation outlining the security standards that these companies should meet ...
"Let’s say all the current age verification providers are incredibly robust, though. ... The question still remains... should you be sharing this information with random websites anyway?
"... once you’ve trained the population of an entire country to routinely hand over their credit card details in order to access content, you have given them an incredibly bad habit that it’s going to be tough to break. ... You don’t just prove your age once, after all, you potentially have to do it dozens of times, to access a bunch of different websites. Everything from BlueSky to PornHub to Spotify and even maybe Wikipedia. It becomes a weekly or perhaps monthly occurrence. Just as individual users don’t tend to read every website’s terms and conditions, it’s unlikely they’re all going to do due diligence checks on every provider who asks for ID, especially once they’ve become used to just handing that data over.
"And although that may not be a problem for _you_, you tech-savvy cleverclogs, if you’ve ever found yourself in the position of unpaid IT support for one of your less knowledgeable friends or relatives, hopefully you can see why it’s a huge problem for the UK population more broadly."
And more!
#AgeVerification #OnlineSafetyAct #OSA

@aardrian@toot.cafe
2025-09-17 17:53:00

Four old posts updated this week:
For Google’s AI Edge Gallery:
adrianroselli.com/2020/03/i-do

@v_i_o_l_a@openbiblio.social
2025-09-19 10:07:51

und jetzt gehts auch schon in die letzte programmpunkte der #oat25!
zunächst die #poster-prämierung: der preis für "beste gestaltung" geht an ""You are not alone! Digitale Fokusgruppe Publikationsberatung", der preis für "am meisten gelernt" an "Wie weit…

@blackknight95857669@social.linux.pizza
2025-08-18 23:09:22

Birth (Multi, XPd on Steam Deck)
You are alone in this world. Why not go on an adventure and find the parts to make yourself a friend?
Birth is a surreal adventure puzzle game, to be sure. You are literally going down a block in a neighborhood, rifling through all the spaces to find and collect bones and organs to construct a new creature.
As puzzle adventures go, this one is pretty solid. For the most part the puzzles are great, with a wide variety and not much repetition.…

@iam_jfnklstrm@social.linux.pizza
2025-08-19 15:36:00

@…
In case you've missed it. About linux desktop on arm
tuxedocomputers.com/en/Where-a

@ruth_mottram@fediscience.org
2025-09-18 17:31:40

The Danish independent media organisation @… are on a member drive with 10 promises if they make it to 50,000, including that they'll share more on social media. I can dream they'll make it to the #fediverse I suppose?
In any case their journalism is outstanding and they carefully avoid making an explicit political stance and contributing to polarisation. #UnbreakingNews
In depth journalism you can read or listen to (try deepL if you don't speak Danish), often beautifully produced, always fascinating. They also don't report on problems without reporting solutions.
It's by far the most uplifting read/listen of my day.
Free link here, pay what you want and free to first time voters...
zetland.dk/a/rmottram?og=amba2

@davidaugust@mastodon.online
2025-08-19 05:23:52

Texas Republicans have locked Democratic Rep. Nicole Collier inside the state house chamber and refuse to allow her to leave?
Honestly, I think livestream: dance on other legislators’ desks. Mock w/parody lyrics from show-tunes, raid copier paper to stuff empty suits and print out opposition faces and put them in seats & act out humiliating legislative scenes.
You’re not locked in with them, their seats are locked in with you.
h/t @peoplefor.bsky.social

An overhead view of a legislative chamber with rows of wooden desks; one desk near the center is circled in red and is occupied.
Rep. Nicole Collier wearing a black blazer and white top, smiling at the camera, with a nameplate and a glass of water visible in the background.
@blakes7bot@mas.torpidity.net
2025-08-18 06:08:04

#Blakes7 Series A, Episode 11 - Bounty
BLAKE: Well, what have I got to gain by lying?
CALLY: You are the only man who can reunite your planet. If you act now, you can save it from war and from the Federation.
BLAKE: Well? [Sarkoff walks away.]

Claude 3.7 describes the image as: "The image shows a scene from what appears to be a science fiction television production from the late 1970s or early 1980s, based on the filming style and costume design. 

In the foreground are three people engaged in what seems to be a tense conversation. On the left is an older person with silver hair wearing formal attire with a distinctive collar. In the center is a person with blonde hair pulled back, wearing a red outfit with a black choker or high nec…
@khalidabuhakmeh@mastodon.social
2025-07-18 13:19:37

Using an AI Agent and MCP for what effectively amounts to an HTML templating engine is the height of wastefulness and excess in tech.
The only people who win in that scenario are the folks charging you for cloud compute.

@Mediagazer@mstdn.social
2025-09-19 02:16:08

Experts say FCC chair Brendan Carr's threats to broadcasters violate the First Amendment and are an abuse of the FCC's power (Greg Sargent/New Republic)
newrepublic.com/article/200649

@gedankenstuecke@scholar.social
2025-06-19 01:19:40

«people’s options for mainstream (and an alarming amount of industry) news are somewhere between “I’m smarter than you,” “something happened!” “sneering contempt,” “a trip to the principal’s office,” or “here’s who you should be mad at,” which I realize also describes the majority of the New York Times opinion page.»
wheresyoured.at/sic/

@peterhoneyman@a2mi.social
2025-08-18 20:00:51

i am determined to read the attention/transformer paper
i even printed it out

Attention Is All You Need
Ashish Vaswani
Noam Shazeer
Niki Parmar
Jakob Uszkoreit
Llion Jones
Aidan N. Gomez
Łukasz Kaiser
Illia Polosukhin

The dominant sequence transduction models are based on complex recurrent or convolutional neural networks that include an encoder and a decoder. The best performing models also connect the encoder and decoder through an attention mechanism. We propose a new simple network architecture, the Transformer, based solely on attention mechanisms, dispensing with …
@brian_gettler@mas.to
2025-07-17 18:40:09

"Tearable puns"

A printed paper sign attached to an electric pole with green masking tape in a front of a tree with houses and a car visible in the background. The sign has tabs hanging off for passersby to take.

The sign reads: THESE ARE TEARABLE PUNS And 'Dad Jokes'
By June 2025, I had shared the full 340 joke collection, so I'm changing things up. I'll now post random reprints from the archives, shared between December 2022 and June 2025. You'll see jokes repeated but won't have to wait until the start of …
@lightweight@mastodon.nzoss.nz
2025-08-19 01:23:37

This is a very good interview - rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/ - Prof Alexandra Andhov is spot on: a) bigtech is more powerful than our gov…

@davej@dice.camp
2025-09-18 19:23:09

Sexy single elk, you say? In MY area? 🤔 flipboard.com/@smithsonianmag/

@adulau@infosec.exchange
2025-07-18 11:34:07

I’ll do an online session about GCVE in 30 minutes. If you want to join, all details are below.
#gcve #vulnerability #vulnerabilitymanagement

@crell@phpc.social
2025-08-18 16:41:09

Bring your whole self to work, and to play. Do not hide who you are.
Unless your whole self is an asshole, then maybe keep that part tucked away around other people, OK?

@toxi@mastodon.thi.ng
2025-07-19 08:08:47

"New technologies, when introduced, are typically given names that overstate their capabilities, usually by equating them with existing familiar systems or technological artefacts. For example the first computers in the 1940s and 1950s, often little more than glorified electric adding machines, were nevertheless described as “electronic brains”. More recently, large language models (LLMs) have been touted as “artificial intelligence”, and complex physics experiments have been touted as …

@migueldeicaza@mastodon.social
2025-09-15 19:36:55

When you are an iOS user, every third Monday of September 2025 is Christmas!
apple.com/newsroom/2025/09/new

@publicvoit@graz.social
2025-09-18 06:41:46

"While preparing for my Black Hat and DEF CON talks in July of this year, I found the most impactful #EntraID #vulnerability that I will probably ever find. This vulnerability could have allowed me to compromise every Entra ID tenant in the world (except probably those in national cloud deploymen…

@arXiv_csAI_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-08-19 10:15:50

RadarQA: Multi-modal Quality Analysis of Weather Radar Forecasts
Xuming He, Zhiyuan You, Junchao Gong, Couhua Liu, Xiaoyu Yue, Peiqin Zhuang, Wenlong Zhang, Lei Bai
arxiv.org/abs/2508.12291

@ErikJonker@mastodon.social
2025-09-18 12:48:54

Interesting,
"One Token to rule them all - obtaining Global Admin in every Entra ID tenant via Actor tokens"
dirkjanm.io/obtaining-global-a

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-08-19 05:08:29

Just finished Transiruby, along with a 9k-line journal file for it. I almost got 100, but not quite; I don't have time to go back to it before the semester starts though.
If you like exploration games, it's an excellent one, with great level design & tons of secrets. It actually makes you do significant secret-finding and map-reading in order to beat the game, not just for extras or a special ending, which is something that a lot of metroidvania games since Super Metroid don't do. My one complaint is that the map system isn't perfect, and finding obscure secrets to progress is fine when the map hints at them but much less fun when it hints incorrectly (I looked one progress item up in a speedrun video because of this).
Decently cool movement mechanics, although the combat does take a back seat and almost all of the bosses are easy (I beat the final two bosses in the third and second tries respectively). I don't think that's any better or worse than a game like Nine Sols where the final boss took me hundreds of tries though; just a different flavor. The world-building isn't as rich as the more epic metroidvanias like Hollow Knight or Lone Fungus (or again, Nine Sols) but again I'm fine with that. It's just a more casual game that has really excellent level design & exploration poetics.
#AmPlaying

@ErikUden@mastodon.de
2025-07-16 06:10:44

thank you, new york times

An article by the New York Times asking “Is it OK to earn rental income from an ICE holding facility?”

“What are the ethics of receiving money from an entity you consider kind of evil?”

Below that there's a woman shown receiving money from the US immigration and customs enforcement
@markhburton@mstdn.social
2025-08-17 08:05:29

"All I can tell you is what people from Altrincham who were at the protest had to say. They are keen to stress, often unprompted, that they are not racist - they are angry and concerned.
"They cite alarming statistics about asylum seekers accused of sexual assault and rape - statistics that I could not find any evidence to support. They claim that asylum seekers in this hotel are 'robbing shops' - something that the police told me they have 'no knowledge' of.&q…

@aral@mastodon.ar.al
2025-07-16 14:03:23

A little reminder that DuckDuckGo is venture capital (VC) funded.
The way VC works:
1. You get VC
2. You grow as fast as you can (or fail fast)
3. You sell (either to a larger corporation or to the public in an IPO; this is called the “exit”)
(In case any of you are surprised by recent/future developments.)
#DuckDuckGo

@arXiv_quantph_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-18 10:12:12

Robust and efficient estimation of global quantum properties under realistic noise
Qingyue Zhang, Dayue Qin, Zhou You, Feng Xu, Jens Eisert, You Zhou
arxiv.org/abs/2507.13237

@imprs_solar@academiccloud.social
2025-07-17 07:56:51
Content warning:

Are you an academic teacher or a researcher in solar system science or a related field interested in pointing your students to exciting PhD opportunities with us? Would you like to receive our Calls for applications (between one to four times per year) and notifications about new PhD project openings by e-mail so you can forward them to your students? Or are you a student who would like to receive such notifications?
Then we invite you to sign up to our mailing list at

@cjust@infosec.exchange
2025-08-15 23:13:18

I guess that whole DOGE cost cutting exercise has reaped some benefits for some folks.
techradar.com/pro/security/fbi

@servelan@newsie.social
2025-09-17 03:26:52

"There’s free speech and then there’s hate speech," Bondi told Stephen Miller’s wife Katie during an episode of her podcast. "We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech.”
A Not-So Normal Tuesday - Civil Discourse with Joyce Vance
joycevance.substack.com/p/a-no

@datascience@genomic.social
2025-08-17 10:00:01

Are you interested in how dependency-heavy your (or another) package is and why? #rstats

@hllizi@hespere.de
2025-08-15 19:45:52

I don't know who you are, I don't know where you come from, I don't know what you like or think or do, but if you design web pages with full-screen modal windows where the back button doesn't take you back to the main page, I think you're an asshole.

@nerb@techhub.social
2025-07-18 18:48:20

Like my new watch display?
It was advertised as for the elderly.
OK, by years lived I probably am one of those but jeez why not advertise it as easy to read or not cluttered with crap you do not need or???

A smartwatch with the a plain black background and an off white display. The time is HUGE so it is very visible. The date is at the upper left in smaller font  and the temperature is visible in smaller font to the right. At the bottom in a similar font to the temperature are heart rate (89) , steps walked ( 2333 need to walk some more !! )  and the battery charge 73%
@samvarma@fosstodon.org
2025-07-16 20:31:49

Just used this to shoot a patch scene that will go into an episode with no other added foley/ADR
iPhone 16: Edit Spatial Audio in Videos With Audio Mix - MacRumors macrumors.com/how-to/iphone-16

@blackknight95857669@social.linux.pizza
2025-08-18 22:38:39

Seedlings (XPd on PC)
There's some strange new forms of life in the New Zealand forests, take control of one and explore.
So this is a short puzzle platformer with a neat catch: most of what you'll see on the screen are images captured directly from the forests of New Zealand. Using real images as a backdrop is certainly not a new idea, but it's used remarkably well here.
The gameplay is simple enough: as an apparently sentient seed, you are tasked with travers…

@UP8@mastodon.social
2025-09-17 20:20:07

For the things that make you go hmmm department [1]
[1] see items (4) and (5)

Screenshot of the popular site Hacker News with an orange banner on top.  The top five items are:

1. WASM 3.0 Completed
2. Anthropic Irks White hour with limits on model's use
3. Apple Photos app corrupts images
4. Depression Reduces Capacity to Learn to Actively Avoid Aversive Events
5. Famous cognitive psychology experiments that failed to replicate

Notably 4 and 5 were both submitted by PaulHoule whose name is in the upper left corner because I (PaulHoule) took the screenshot when I was lo…
@inthehands@hachyderm.io
2025-07-13 17:28:01

❝I have noticed that we people privileged by supremacy have a tendency to take this same stance toward newly aware people, a stance which is not ours to assume. We seem to feel that it is our business to meet people who are in the same place that we were just a few short years or decades ago, and meet their shock and surprise and anger and dismay with a skepticism and an impatience we haven't earned.
We say things like "are you surprised?"
We say things like "why does this shock you?"
We say "oh so you're only angry now?"
We say things like "where have you been?"

Instead of asking “are you surprised?” say “I was surprised once, too; here's what I know.” Instead of “what took you so long?” say “I just got here recently; here's what I've learned.”❞ mastodon.social/@JuliusGoat/11

@jensilber@mastodon.social
2025-07-17 13:05:31

This one is around the corner from my office. I never suspected what it might look like on the inside.
instagram.com/zillowgonewild/p

@arXiv_physicsoptics_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-06-19 10:01:57

Near-field optical mode engineering-enabled freeform nonlocal metasurfaces
Zhongjun Jiang, Tianxiang Dai, Shuwei Guo, Soyaib Sohag, Yixuan Shao, Chenkai Mao, Andrea Al\`u, Jonathan A. Fan, You Zhou
arxiv.org/abs/2506.15495

@qurlyjoe@mstdn.social
2025-08-15 17:47:24

An FPV #videogame wherein you are a trauma center doc trying to keep patients from other shoot-em-up games with injuries of varying severity alive, while managing your team of nurses and other docs. Alternate game: patients are coming in from a natural disaster, or a mass shooting. Difficulty level, e .g.,number of incoming patients, and severity of injuries, increases; while resources, as in sup…

@YaleDivinitySchool@mstdn.social
2025-09-16 12:10:41

Considering seminary or divinity school? We are having an open house for prospective students on October 27, and you're invited. Join us and learn about our offerings, meet faculty, staff, and students, and gain an insider's perspective on YDS.
Learn more about the Oct. 27 Open House and start your application process here:

Graphic: Yale Divinity School, Interested in graduate theological education? Discerning a call to ministry? Fall Open House For Prospective Students. Join us for a day of theological exploration and discernment.

The U.S. Department of Education has pulled funding for programs in eight states
aimed at supporting students who have both hearing and vision loss,
a move that could affect some of the country’s most vulnerable students.
The programs are considered vital in those states but represent only a little over $1 million a year in federal money.
Nonetheless, they got caught in the Trump administration’s attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion,
with an Education Dep…

@pre@boing.world
2025-08-11 18:01:41
Content warning: re: UKPol, Palestine Action, reply from my MP

Emily Thornberry's formberry reply:
Thank you for writing to me regarding the Home Secretary's decision to proscribe Palestine Action.
I believe the right to protest is a fundamental right in our democracy and I will continue to wholeheartedly defend this. I appreciate the concerns you have raised regarding proscribing Palestine
Action, however, as there is an upcoming judicial review into the ban, I am limited as to what I can say on the matter at the moment.
I was pleased that the near weekly protests in London and across the country, calling for an end to Palestinian suffering, have continued. I am certain we all want to see an immediate end to the immense suffering the Palestinian people are being subjected to, and the resumption of the critical aid deliveries which are so desperately needed in Gaza.
I am thankful that the Government have now set out an approach to recognising the Palestinian state as a step towards a lasting ceasefire. If you would like to know more about my wider views on the Israel-Palestine conflict, which you can view below.
Thank you again for writing to me on this very important issue. Let me assure you I will continue to push from within Parliament for an end to the violence and a peaceful two-state solution.
Best wishes,
Rt Hon Emily Thornberry MP

@blakes7bot@mas.torpidity.net
2025-09-16 19:51:37

Series C, Episode 02 - Powerplay
AVON: Now you.
TARRANT: I am Del Tarrant.
AVON: Register the voices, Zen. From now on you will obey their requests and commands.
ZEN: Confirmed.
AVON: Welcome to the Liberator.
VILA: And you are, welcome to it.
blake.torpidity.net/m/302/528

Claude Sonnet 4.0 describes the image as: "This appears to be a scene set aboard a spacecraft, likely the Liberator or Scorpio, featuring three characters in what seems to be a tense moment. The setting shows the distinctive futuristic interior design typical of the series, with sleek walls and technological elements visible in the background. The characters are positioned in what appears to be a confrontational or dramatic scene - one wearing an elegant white outfit, another in dark clothing, …
@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-07-17 13:31:49

To add a single example here (feel free to chime in with your own):
Problem: editing code is sometimes tedious because external APIs require boilerplate.
Solutions:
- Use LLM-generated code. Downsides: energy use, code theft, potential for legal liability, makes mistakes, etc. Upsides: popular among some peers, seems easy to use.
- Pick a better library (not always possible).
- Build internal functions to centralize boilerplate code, then use those (benefits: you get a better understanding of the external API, and a more-unit-testable internal code surface; probably less amortized effort).
- Develop a non-LLM system that actually reasons about code at something like the formal semantics level and suggests boilerplate fill-ins based on rules, while foregrounding which rules it's applying so you can see the logic behind the suggestions (needs research).
Obviously LLM use in coding goes beyond this single issue, but there are similar analyses for each potential use of LLMs in coding. I'm all cases there are:
1. Existing practical solutions that require more effort (or in many cases just seem to but are less-effort when amortized).
2. Near-term researchable solutions that directly address the problem and which would be much more desirable in the long term.
Thus in addition to disastrous LLM effects on the climate, on data laborers, and on the digital commons, they tend to suck us into cheap-seeming but ultimately costly design practices while also crowding out better long-term solutions. Next time someone suggests how useful LLMs are for some task, try asking yourself (or them) what an ideal solution for that task would look like, and whether LLM use moves us closer to or father from a world in which that solution exists.

@arXiv_csHC_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-09-16 11:59:17

You Are Not Alone: Designing Body Doubling for ADHD in Virtual Reality
Zinat Ara, Imtiaz Bin Rahim, Puqi Zhou, Liuchuan Yu, Behzad Esmaeili, Lap-Fai Yu, Sungsoo Ray Hong
arxiv.org/abs/2509.12153

@aral@mastodon.ar.al
2025-07-17 08:46:03

Guy next to me at the cafe I’m working out of this morning gets a call:
“… no we don’t live there anymore… no… no, we don’t live there anymore… are you serious?! [my ears perk up] Is this AI?… It is?!”
Spoke to him afterwards. Apparently “some energy company.” And it was an LLM on the other side. He said it sounded so real (a woman who gave him her name and sounded perfectly normal) until he asked it if it was AI when it responded “yes” and then restarted the script.
*smdh…

@shoppingtonz@mastodon.social
2025-07-16 16:22:11

Whomever you are, don't scare other Mastodon users and try to misinform them about Mastodon or the fediverse.
This place respects privacy a heckuva lot more than you express it to be. I'm guessing also you are not the first.
If someone visits your/my profile there is no tracking who visits it and who don't and there is absolutely no proof that any user can see who visits their profile.
I'm not an expert but ask away

@arXiv_eessIV_bot@mastoxiv.page
2025-07-17 07:53:00

3D Wavelet Latent Diffusion Model for Whole-Body MR-to-CT Modality Translation
Jiaxu Zheng, Meiman He, Xuhui Tang, Xiong Wang, Tuoyu Cao, Tianyi Zeng, Lichi Zhang, Chenyu You
arxiv.org/abs/2507.11557

@tante@tldr.nettime.org
2025-09-12 07:40:05

"Kirk’s violent rhetoric helped shape this world, and yet, it has been deemed “civil” by those on both sides of the political divide. This is the mark of a sick society, one that is perfectly fine with an unconscionable body count as long as none of the disfigured, barely recognizable faces are ones we know from a screen."
(Original title: OK, But You Do Know You’re Eulogizing Charlie Kirk, Right?)

@Techpizzamondays@social.linux.pizza
2025-07-15 04:16:39

“Running an Activity in the Pub is a great way to meet other people near you who are into the Fediverse.” It would be incredibly difficult for us to agree more. fedihost.co/blog/slug/activity

@trochee@dair-community.social
2025-09-11 15:19:12

Jobs at alignmentalignment.ai/jobs
CAAAC is an open, dynamic, inclusive environment, where all perspectives are welcomed as long as you believe AGI will annihilate all humans in the next six months. We offer competitive salaries and generous benefits, including no performance management becaus…

Center for the Alignment of AI Alignment Centers

Jobs

About our team

CAAAC is an open, dynamic, inclusive environment, where all perspectives are welcomed as long as you believe AGI will annihilate all humans in the next six months. We offer competitive salaries and generous benefits, including no performance management because we have no way to assess whether the work you do is at all useful.

We are currently actively hiring for the following roles:

(Page ends, because they're not actuall…
@emd@cosocial.ca
2025-09-14 17:33:43

Imma be rich! Thanks Elon!

                    Greetings to you, This is Elon Musk,
Founder, CEO and Chief Engineer of the SpaceX team; early stage investor, CEO and product architect of Tesla, Inc.; and co-founder of Neuralink and OpenAI. With an estimated net worth of around $245 billion. My team has considered donating to randomly selected people as a government approved charity.

Your email account has been picked as a donation fund of a lump sum pay out of $7,124,270.00. You are to contact our claims agent for valid…
@ubuntourist@mastodon.social
2025-08-15 13:33:12

#resist #WashingtonDC

Chief Smith, listen to the DC Attorney General: "the Bondi Order is unlawful, you are not legally obligated to follow it."

We call on DC neighborrs to come to MPD headquarters today at 12 PM [sic] to add a personal message to the DC AG's letter about why Chief Smith needs to refuse Trump's unlawful order to install an emergency commissioner.

Friday August 15 from 12-2 PM, 441 4th St. NW

Free DC - https://FreeDCproject.org/smith
@NFL@darktundra.xyz
2025-09-15 11:31:39

The NFL teams already panicking, plus an MLB standings check nytimes.com/athletic/6629887/2

@simon_brooke@mastodon.scot
2025-08-14 18:05:27

So, about sending money to folk in the #Gaza #Famine
Yes, there are probably scammers pretending to be in Gaza to profit off public sympathy, but if you're too afraid of being scammed to offer generosity to people in desperate need, how does that feel?
And yes, feeding folk in an artificiall…

@andres4ny@social.ridetrans.it
2025-07-14 23:55:42

echoing your voice just like the ringing in my ears mastodon.social/@plaguepoems/1

@cyrevolt@mastodon.social
2025-07-14 11:45:46

Quite extensive writeup on the whole W/X situation, the title suggesting too political of a discussion - I do recommend reading through it, neglecting stances, and just seeing where the projects stand.
To be clear, I do not endorse or judge anything here. It helps getting an overview. In the end, there are too many aspects, and deciding for either solution requires you to consider your personal preferences and priorities.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2025-09-15 10:32:50

People keep trying to point to an event where the "right/left" political violence thing got out of hand. You cannot point to anywhere in US history where the right hasn't been murdering leftists. It has never happened.
They've been talking about civil war since they lost the last one, and most of US politics before that was just trying to prevent the first one.
There isn't a wave of right/left violence. Right wing violence has just gone unchecked for so long, and been so accepted, that now they're killing each other regularly. The Trump assassination attempts were all from the right. #CharlieKirk was killed by another fascist for not being fascist enough.
Fascists have so completely taken over that they see each other as legitimate targets because they've run out of "leftists" worth murdering. That's the story. That's what people can't wrap their heads around.
Everyone is worried about the right wing response, worries about right wing escalation, but they called for civil war over the cracker barrel logo. They're already maxing out their base. All the proud boys and other Nazis are already hired by ICE. They're also already going as hard as they can. They don't need any excuses. They have total control of everything. This bumbling mess is *the best they can do.* They call for civil war every few days.
We're not seeing a war between the left and the right. We're seeing a war between the right and the far right, where both side opportunistically punch left when they can and liberals help them justify their actions.
#USPol

@StephenRees@mas.to
2025-08-13 22:11:40

From David Suzuki
We need real solutions for affordability, energy security and responding to the threats from the United States.
Canada’s electricity demands are set to triple in the coming decades. We have an opportunity to build shovel-ready, made-in-Canada projects by upgrading Canada’s power grid with renewable power, not fossil fuels.
Did you know Canada’s provincial electricity grids are more connected to the United States than with each other?
1/n

The David Suzuki Foundation logo over a diagram of electricity systems
@bobmueller@mastodon.world
2025-09-16 15:45:01

Dammit, incarcerated people and their families are NOT an income stream! You want to cut security costs? Make it easier for families to stay in touch with each other. that helps reintegration and lower recidivism rates. It's a win-win. #Oklahoma #PrisonReform

@LillyHerself@Mastodon.social
2025-09-11 21:21:56

"You are now entering into ... the Twilight Zone"

Rod Serling and an early 1960s style television
Toronto man wakes from nap
to find himself falsely accused
online of killing Charlie Kirk
“I was sort of shocked,” said the 77-year-old Toronto man
who was wrongly accused on social media of killing Kirk.
Sept.11,2025
@blakes7bot@mas.torpidity.net
2025-07-16 21:20:46

Series D, Episode 08 - Games
AVON: We don't have half an hour!
VILA: I know that, but unless you can cut off one of Belkov's fingers for me - just a minute? [He bends down and grabs Tarrant's foot]
TARRANT: Vila, what are you doing?
blake.torpidity.net/m/408/480

Claude Sonnet 4.0 describes the image as: "This scene takes place in what appears to be a futuristic spacecraft or space station interior, characterized by the distinctive metallic walls and technological panels typical of the series' production design. The setting has a sterile, high-tech aesthetic with geometric patterns and industrial lighting.

In the scene, three characters are positioned in what appears to be a corridor or operational area. One figure stands to the left observing the inte…
@Schrank@phpc.social
2025-09-15 14:23:48

What are your main reasons you want an automated deployment?

@gray17@mastodon.social
2025-07-15 02:59:14

> Where generative language models run into trouble is in situations where choosing a word based on the context isn’t enough to get it right: that is, in situations where tokens are denotationally distinct but contextually identical. These words appear in the exact same situations, but mean different things. Which words do that? Often, numbers.

@pbloem@sigmoid.social
2025-07-11 17:26:10

It's worth bearing in mind that all AI companies are in that phase where they burn money to attract the most customers and hope that the competition blinks first. That means all AI is pretty badly underpriced.
For coding, that's a problem. It's just on the edge of being arguably positive for some. If the price goes up by an order of ten, the bubble is going to burst. And it may take the other AI use cases with it. After all, coding was kind of a killer app.

@robpike@hachyderm.io
2025-07-12 00:39:11

GMail:
"Be careful with this message.
This message appears to be sent from your account but Gmail couldn't verify this. Someone might be impersonating your account. If you're not sure the message is from you, use caution when clicking links, downloading attachments, or replying with personal information."
I sent it while logged in to GMail using multiple authentication steps from my home network using a secure laptop. What are they talking about? Serious question: how could they not verify it? It's either an idiotic engineering problem on their end or I'm terrified that security is meaningless. Probably both.

@EgorKotov@datasci.social
2025-09-10 08:59:43

From a Q2 (according to Elsevier Scopus ) journal asking for a review. They are not even trying. According to them, I have an "expertise in areas related to linguistics (if any)" [I love this "if any"!] , makes me "an ideal candidate to review the manuscript".

Dear E.A. Koto,
Hope you are well.
We are contacting you because your expertise in areas related to linguistics (if any)
makes you an ideal candidate to review the manuscript entitled "I.

submitted to@he Forum for Linguistic Studies (FLS). §)e manuscript
summary is provided below for YSummgierence:
[This study examines the morphological patterns of three languages—

I Focusing
on bound morphemes, both derivational and inflectional, the research adopts a
Forum for Linguistic Studies
COUNTRY SUB…
@ruth_mottram@fediscience.org
2025-07-15 11:19:39

To go back to my previous post, for a plant-based diet to be attractive, we need to help people choose plant based alternatives to meat for more or less all occasions. So meat is no longer the default
That's what we need good chefs for: to help turn traditional foods into vegetarian/vegan alternatives that are tasty and easy to prepare.
Most traditional dishes are surprisingly modern. Our tastes can easily be changed...
As an example, in France, the markets are laden with charcuterie and cheese, BUT ALSO, beautiful fresh fruits and vegetables - a nudge towards the latter would improve human health, animal welfare and reduce emissions...
#PlantBased food.
This site however is outstanding making french cuisine vegan
menu-vegetarien.com/

@kurtsh@mastodon.social
2025-09-13 13:02:00

Stagnation & high inflation are an American self-own.... brought to you courtesy of Trump & the Republicans.
From: @…
threads.com/@keithboykin/post/

@deepthoughts10@infosec.exchange
2025-07-15 12:43:57

I learned something new today—threat actors are using AWS Lambda URLs for C2. Lambda is an ephemeral serverless function service from AWS. They have different URL endpoints in the different AWS regions. One example is: <uniquename>.lambda-url.ap-southeast-1.on[.]aws
Something you may want to hunt for. #cybersecurity

@joergi@chaos.social
2025-07-14 09:57:52

Short question to anyone with a Mobilizon account:
If I send you from Mastodon a private message, are you able to receive it / read it in Mobilzon? Thx.
(I'm still waiting for an answer, so maybe it's just not working...)
#fediverse #mastodon

@rasterweb@mastodon.social
2025-09-10 03:14:54

I printed a MIK adapter and it fits into the rear rack of the Level 3. Aventon will not say the rack is MIK-compatible.
Maybe it's a licensing issue? I've seen them post "Our racks are not labeled for MIK compatibility. For a rack to be 100% compatible, it must have the MIK or MIK HD logo on the rack." So maybe its a wink-wink situation.
Let's just unofficially say you can (probably) use MIK stuff on the rear rack of the Level 3.

A 3D printed MIK adapter plate on an Aventon Level 3 rear rack.
A 3D printed MIK adapter plate on an Aventon Level 3 rear rack.
@mgorny@social.treehouse.systems
2025-08-12 18:12:44

I was trying to package #FlexiBLAS for #Gentoo, and to be honest, it doesn't look that good.
The first red flag is lack of an open bug tracker. Apparently, there is the tracker on GitLab that's limited to "members of their group and selected external contributors", but it doesn't seem to be used much. So it's "send us an email", and wonder how many people sent us the same bug report before.
The git repository is currently at something tagged 3.4.80 that seems to be prerelease, and its build system is quite broken. Not exactly the best path to verify that the bugs you are hitting are still there.
Now, upstream seems to insist on either using vendored netlib #LAPACK, or statically linking to the system library (we don't install the static libraries). Apparently I can specify the shared libraries instead, but it doesn't work — and it's unclear to me whether it doesn't work because I'm using the shared libraries, or because it doesn't support my LAPACK version. If I build LAPACK without deprecated symbols, it refuses to load it at runtime because of missing symbols. And if I build it with deprecated symbols, it fails to find some symbols at CMake time.
Honestly, I feel like I've spent too much time on this project already, especially given that its future is entirely unclear to me — the current git is quite broken, I have no clue how many issues were reported already and whether my bug reports will receive any reply. It definitely doesn't fare well for a package that we might start to rely heavily on. We don't want a cathedral there.
mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/projects/
gitlab.mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/so

@al3x@hachyderm.io
2025-07-14 18:28:24

I am looking for a solution to monitor my levels of stress. I wear an Apple Watch almost all time.
Is anyone here using the Apple Watch to monitor their stress? What application are you using?
My research brought about a handful of apps that monitor stress using a combination of HRV and RHR. Their ratings and subscriptions cover a very wide range to be useful (e.g. one has over 100k reviews and the 2nd one under 10k)

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-08-12 09:01:39

Long post, game design
Crungle is a game designed to be a simple test of general reasoning skills that's difficult to play by rote memory, since there are many possible rule sets, but it should be easy to play if one can understand and extrapolate from rules. The game is not necessarily fair, with the first player often having an advantage or a forced win. The game is entirely deterministic, although a variant determines the rule set randomly.
This is version 0.1, and has not yet been tested at all.
Crungle is a competitive game for two players, each of whom controls a single piece on a 3x3 grid. The cells of the grid are numbered from 1 to 9, starting at the top left and proceeding across each row and then down to the next row, so the top three cells are 1, 2, and 3 from left to right, then the next three are 4, 5, and 6 and the final row is cells 7, 8, and 9.
The two players decide who shall play as purple and who shall play as orange. Purple goes first, starting the rules phase by picking one goal rule from the table of goal rules. Next, orange picks a goal rule. These two goal rules determine the two winning conditions. Then each player, starting with orange, alternate picking a movement rule until four movement rules have been selected. During this process, at most one indirect movement rule may be selected. Finally, purple picks a starting location for orange (1-9), with 5 (the center) not allowed. Then orange picks the starting location for purple, which may not be adjacent to orange's starting position.
Alternatively, the goal rules, movement rules, and starting positions may be determined randomly, or a pre-determined ruleset may be selected.
If the ruleset makes it impossible to win, the players should agree to a draw. Either player could instead "bet" their opponent. If the opponent agrees to the bet, the opponent must demonstrate a series of moves by both players that would result in a win for either player. If they can do this, they win, but if they submit an invalid demonstration or cannot submit a demonstration, the player who "bet" wins.
Now that starting positions, movement rules, and goals have been decided, the play phase proceeds with each player taking a turn, starting with purple, until one player wins by satisfying one of the two goals, or until the players agree to a draw. Note that it's possible for both players to occupy the same space.
During each player's turn, that player identifies one of the four movement rules to use and names the square they move to using that rule, then they move their piece into that square and their turn ends. Neither player may use the same movement rule twice in a row (but it's okay to use the same rule your opponent just did unless another rule disallows that). If the movement rule a player picks moves their opponent's piece, they need to state where their opponent's piece ends up. Pieces that would move off the board instead stay in place; it's okay to select a rule that causes your piece to stay in place because of this rule. However, if a rule says "pick a square" or "move to a square" with some additional criteria, but there are no squares that meet those criteria, then that rule may not be used, and a player who picks that rule must pick a different one instead.
Any player who incorrectly states a destination for either their piece or their opponent's piece, picks an invalid square, or chooses an invalid rule has made a violation, as long as their opponent objects before selecting their next move. A player who makes at least three violations immediately forfeits and their opponent wins by default. However, if a player violates a rule but their opponent does not object before picking their next move, the stated destination(s) of the invalid move still stand, and the violation does not count. If a player objects to a valid move, their objection is ignored, and if they do this at least three times, they forfeit and their opponent wins by default.
Goal rules (each player picks one; either player can win using either chosen rule):
End your turn in the same space as your opponent three turns in a row.
End at least one turn in each of the 9 cells.
End five consecutive turns in the three cells in any single row, ending at least one turn on each of the three.
End five consecutive turns in the three cells in any single column, ending at least one turn on each of the three.
Within the span of 8 consecutive turns, end at least one turn in each of cells 1, 3, 7, and 9 (the four corners of the grid).
Within the span of 8 consecutive turns at least one turn in each of cells 2, 4, 6, and 8 (the central cells on each side).
Within the span of 8 consecutive turns, end at least one turn in the cell directly above your opponent, and end at least one turn in the cell directly below your opponent (in either order).
Within the span of 8 consecutive turns at least one turn in the cell directly to the left of your opponent, and end at least one turn in the cell directly to the right of your opponent (in either order).
End 12 turns in a row without ending any of them in cell 5.
End 8 turns in a row in 8 different cells.
Movement rules (each player picks two; either player may move using any of the four):
Move to any cell on the board that's diagonally adjacent to your current position.
Move to any cell on the board that's orthogonally adjacent to your current position.
Move up one cell. Also move your opponent up one cell.
Move down one cell. Also move your opponent down one cell.
Move left one cell. Also move your opponent left one cell.
Move right one cell. Also move your opponent right one cell.
Move up one cell. Move your opponent down one cell.
Move down one cell. Move your opponent up one cell.
Move left one cell. Move your opponent right one cell.
Move right one cell. Move your opponent left one cell.
Move any pieces that aren't in square 5 clockwise around the edge of the board 1 step (for example, from 1 to 2 or 3 to 6 or 9 to 8).
Move any pieces that aren't in square 5 counter-clockwise around the edge of the board 1 step (for example, from 1 to 4 or 6 to 3 or 7 to 8).
Move to any square reachable from your current position by a knight's move in chess (in other words, a square that's in an adjacent column and two rows up or down, or that's in an adjacent row and two columns left or right).
Stay in the same place.
Swap places with your opponent's piece.
Move back to the position that you started at on your previous turn.
If you are on an odd-numbered square, move to any other odd-numbered square. Otherwise, move to any even-numbered square.
Move to any square in the same column as your current position.
Move to any square in the same row as your current position.
Move to any square in the same column as your opponent's position.
Move to any square in the same row as your opponent's position.
Pick a square that's neither in the same row as your piece nor in the same row as your opponent's piece. Move to that square.
Pick a square that's neither in the same column as your piece nor in the same column as your opponent's piece. Move to that square.
Move to one of the squares orthogonally adjacent to your opponent's piece.
Move to one of the squares diagonally adjacent to your opponent's piece.
Move to the square opposite your current position across the middle square, or stay in place if you're in the middle square.
Pick any square that's closer to your opponent's piece than the square you're in now, measured using straight-line distance between square centers (this includes the square your opponent is in). Move to that square.
Pick any square that's further from your opponent's piece than the square you're in now, measured using straight-line distance between square centers. Move to that square.
If you are on a corner square (1, 3, 7, or 9) move to any other corner square. Otherwise, move to square 5.
If you are on an edge square (2, 4, 6, or 8) move to any other edge square. Otherwise, move to square 5.
Indirect movement rules (may be chosen instead of a direct movement rule; at most one per game):
Move using one of the other three movement rules selected in your game, and in addition, your opponent may not use that rule on their next turn (nor may they select it via an indirect rule like this one).
Select two of the other three movement rules, declare them, and then move as if you had used one and then the other, applying any additional effects of both rules in order.
Move using one of the other three movement rules selected in your game, but if the move would cause your piece to move off the board, instead of staying in place move to square 5 (in the middle).
Pick one of the other three movement rules selected in your game and apply it, but move your opponent's piece instead of your own piece. If that movement rule says to move "your opponent's piece," instead apply that movement to your own piece. References to "your position" and "your opponent's position" are swapped when applying the chosen rule, as are references to "your turn" and "your opponent's turn" and do on.
#Game #GameDesign

@adulau@infosec.exchange
2025-07-14 19:47:07

Wrapped up an energising Vulnerability Lookup workshop during @…’s Virtual Summer School 2025.
Video and slides are now available.
Big thanks to everyone who joined the discussions.
:youtube: Video

@toxi@mastodon.thi.ng
2025-08-15 07:32:49

Time for another round of critical AI weekend reading:
Crashing hard: why talking about bubbles obscures the real social cost of overinvesting into “Artificial Intelligence”
Aline Blankertz (@…)

Attend online events and trainings 
If you can’t make it out to an
in-person event,
you can find a wide variety of events, trainings, and more online.
Visit the Mobilize feed to see what events are happening and learn how you can join in. 
mobilize.us/peoplefor/

@davidaugust@mastodon.online
2025-07-08 18:58:11

Do you know someone who found their way out of a cult, or did you, and do they or you want to help others find their way out too?
I designed a t-shirt for that:
bit.ly/CultSurvivor-whitewriti

Are you a cult survivor? Do you need a new shirt? You can get one! 

[two t-shirts, one black with white writing and one pink with black writing, both displaying a design with the text "Cult Survivor" above an illustration of three figures with raised arms and the phrase "(ask me how)" below them] 

My new design available on Threadless in many colors and styles for adults and children [shocked emoji] 

bit.ly/CultSurvivor-whitwriting 
bit.ly/CultSurvivor-blackwriting
@grumpybozo@toad.social
2025-07-12 22:15:22

I would definitely advise anyone working to resolve our current predicament not do or say anything which might be viewed as criminal, unless you actually intend to play an active role in a war.
ICE and CBP agents as well as any military or local law enforcers are operating under the color of law based in part on a declaration of emergency by POTUS asserting that we are in a de facto war. They are choosing involvement in a war. Legitimate military targets.

@hex@kolektiva.social
2025-07-10 21:50:24

If you save someone from having their face eaten by a leopard, you have their ear and the beliefs that lead you to save them suddenly have weight. If you abandon them, you have nothing at best and an enemy at worst.
It doesn't matter if they voted to release the leopards or were simply caught by them, the two possible outcomes are the same.
Anarchists build systems to save people. That will always be our advantage. We should use it.

@migueldeicaza@mastodon.social
2025-09-11 02:53:22

I thought I would get an orange pro, but now I am thinking “Miguel you are a stylish person, you need the air” but a voice inside me says “you need as many camera lenses as Apple can put in there”
The next 35 hours will be packed with anxiety.

@pavelasamsonov@mastodon.social
2025-09-08 14:37:01

You ask your roommate to buy toilet paper. They show you the receipt as proof. The next morning, when you need toilet paper, the drawer is actually empty. This is because they used an innovative new method called Lean Shopping, where instead of buying the things they just print out a receipt — saving time and money.
This is a story about the social nature of problem framing, and when "high velocity" becomes less productive.

@andres4ny@social.ridetrans.it
2025-07-08 16:17:45

Do transit planners realize they're helping the anti-Mamdani frenzy by publishing their pieces? Of *course* you're getting attention for your fares-are-good-actually writing now, despite the fact that no one cares about this normally - because billionaire media wants whatever they can use against Mamdani.
(As an aside, you also sound incredibly obnoxious when voters are like "we want fast & free buses" and you respond with "well actually..")

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-09-13 23:43:29

TL;DR: what if nationalism, not anarchy, is futile?
Since I had the pleasure of seeing the "what would anarchists do against a warlord?" argument again in my timeline, I'll present again my extremely simple proposed solution:
Convince the followers of the warlord that they're better off joining you in freedom, then kill or exile the warlord once they're alone or vastly outnumbered.
Remember that even in our own historical moment where nothing close to large-scale free society has existed in living memory, the warlord's promise of "help me oppress others and you'll be richly rewarded" is a lie that many understand is historically a bad bet. Many, many people currently take that bet, for a variety of reasons, and they're enough to coerce through fear an even larger number of others. But although we imagine, just as the medieval peasants might have imagined of monarchy, that such a structure is both the natural order of things and much too strong to possibly fail, in reality it takes an enormous amount of energy, coordination, and luck for these structures to persist! Nations crumble every day, and none has survived more than a couple *hundred* years, compared to pre-nation societies which persisted for *tends of thousands of years* if not more. I'm this bubbling froth of hierarchies, the notion that hierarchy is inevitable is certainly popular, but since there's clearly a bit of an ulterior motive to make (and teach) that claim, I'm not sure we should trust it.
So what I believe could form the preconditions for future anarchist societies to avoid the "warlord problem" is merely: a widespread common sense belief that letting anyone else have authority over you is morally suspect. Given such a belief, a warlord will have a hard time building any following at all, and their opponents will have an easy time getting their supporters to defect. In fact, we're already partway there, relative to the situation a couple hundred years ago. At that time, someone could claim "you need to obey my orders and fight and die for me because the Queen was my mother" and that was actually a quite successful strategy. Nowadays, this strategy is only still working in a few isolated places, and the idea that one could *start a new monarchy* or even resurrect a defunct one seems absurd. So why can't that same transformation from "this is just how the world works" to "haha, how did anyone ever believe *that*? also happen to nationalism in general? I don't see an obvious reason why not.
Now I think one popular counterargument to this is: if you think non-state societies can win out with these tactics, why didn't they work for American tribes in the face of the European colonizers? (Or insert your favorite example of colonialism here.) I think I can imagine a variety of reasons, from the fact that many of those societies didn't try this tactic (and/or were hierarchical themselves), to the impacts of disease weakening those societies pre-contact, to the fact that with much-greater communication and education possibilities it might work better now, to the fact that most of those tribes are *still* around, and a future in which they persist longer than the colonist ideologies actually seems likely to me, despite the fact that so much cultural destruction has taken place. In fact, if the modern day descendants of the colonized tribes sow the seeds of a future society free of colonialism, that's the ultimate demonstration of the futility of hierarchical domination (I just read "Theory of Water" by Leanne Betasamosake Simpson).
I guess the TL;DR on this is: what if nationalism is actually as futile as monarchy, and we're just unfortunately living in the brief period during which it is ascendant?

@toxi@mastodon.thi.ng
2025-07-13 06:30:01

Majestic Trinity: Trettachspitze, Mädelegabel, Hochfrottspitze.
(Picture taken two weeks ago. If you zoom in & squint you can make out the crosses on the three summits...)
#SilentSunday #LandscapePhotography

Photo of the three major summits in the Allgäu High Alps with another mountain pass (hiding another valley in between) in the foreground. Some part of the rocks and the pass are in sunlight. The pass is partially rocky with some grassy patches with low-growth mountain pines. The main summits are partially shrouded in moody gray clouds. The telescopic view and depth compression lends the scene and shapes an almost abstract character (intentionally!)...
@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-07-19 07:51:05

AI, AGI, and learning efficiency
My 4-month-old kid is not DDoSing Wikipedia right now, nor will they ever do so before learning to speak, read, or write. Their entire "training corpus" will not top even 100 million "tokens" before they can speak & understand language, and do so with real intentionally.
Just to emphasize that point: 100 words-per-minute times 60 minutes-per-hour times 12 hours-per-day times 365 days-per-year times 4 years is a mere 105,120,000 words. That's a ludicrously *high* estimate of words-per-minute and hours-per-day, and 4 years old (the age of my other kid) is well after basic speech capabilities are developed in many children, etc. More likely the available "training data" is at least 1 or 2 orders of magnitude less than this.
The point here is that large language models, trained as they are on multiple *billions* of tokens, are not developing their behavioral capabilities in a way that's remotely similar to humans, even if you believe those capabilities are similar (they are by certain very biased ways of measurement; they very much aren't by others). This idea that humans must be naturally good at acquiring language is an old one (see e.g. #AI #LLM #AGI

@blakes7bot@mas.torpidity.net
2025-08-15 15:14:40

Series D, Episode 01 - Rescue
AVON: But not without a gun.
DORIAN: That's right, Soolin.
[Soolin examines her gun.]
SOOLIN: You're right. I did underestimate you, my dear.
blake.torpidity.net/m/401/484 B7B4

Claude Sonnet 4.0 describes the image as: "I can see this appears to be from a science fiction television production, likely from the late 1970s or early 1980s based on the image quality and styling. The scene shows someone in what appears to be a futuristic costume with metallic or reflective elements, standing in an outdoor setting with foliage and buildings visible in the background. The costume design and production values are characteristic of British science fiction television from that e…
@aral@mastodon.ar.al
2025-08-12 11:23:36

“If you don’t like <insert Big Tech here>, just don’t use it” is a refrain I’ve often heard. Been warning folks for years that these things will become no longer optional. Maybe we need a new colloquialism; a corollary to “fuck around and find out.” Maybe “stay indifferent and find out?” mastodon.green/@g…

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-09-14 12:01:38

TL;DR: what if instead of denying the harms of fascism, we denied its suppressive threats of punishment
Many of us have really sharpened our denial skills since the advent of the ongoing pandemic (perhaps you even hesitated at the word "ongoing" there and thought "maybe I won't read this one, it seems like it'll be tiresome"). I don't say this as a preface to a fiery condemnation or a plea to "sanity" or a bunch of evidence of how bad things are, because I too have honed my denial skills in these recent years, and I feel like talking about that development.
Denial comes in many forms, including strategic information avoidance ("I don't have time to look that up right now", "I keep forgetting to look into that", "well this author made a tiny mistake, so I'll click away and read something else", "I'm so tired of hearing about this, let me scroll farther", etc.) strategic dismissal ("look, there's a bit of uncertainty here, I should ignore this", "this doesn't line up perfectly with my anecdotal experience, it must be completely wrong", etc.) and strategic forgetting ("I don't remember what that one study said exactly; it was painful to think about", "I forgot exactly what my friend was saying when we got into that argument", etc.). It's in fact a kind of skill that you can get better at, along with the complementary skill of compartmentalization. It can of course be incredibly harmful, and a huge genre of fables exists precisely to highlight its harms, but it also has some short-term psychological benefits, chiefly in the form of muting anxiety. This is not an endorsement of denial (the harms can be catastrophic), but I want to acknowledge that there *are* short-term benefits. Via compartmentalization, it's even possible to be honest with ourselves about some of our own denials without giving them up immediately.
But as I said earlier, I'm not here to talk you out of your denials. Instead, given that we are so good at denial now, I'm here to ask you to be strategic about it. In particular, we live in a world awash with propaganda/advertising that serves both political and commercial ends. Why not use some of our denial skills to counteract that?
For example, I know quite a few people in complete denial of our current political situation, but those who aren't (including myself) often express consternation about just how many people in the country are supporting literal fascism. Of course, logically that appearance of widespread support is going to be partly a lie, given how much our public media is beholden to the fascists or outright in their side. Finding better facts on the true level of support is hard, but in the meantime, why not be in denial about the "fact" that Trump has widespread popular support?
To give another example: advertisers constantly barrage us with messages about our bodies and weight, trying to keep us insecure (and thus in the mood to spend money to "fix" the problem). For sure cutting through that bullshit by reading about body positivity etc. is a better solution, but in the meantime, why not be in denial about there being anything wrong with your body?
This kind of intentional denial certainly has its own risks (our bodies do actually need regular maintenance, for example, so complete denial on that front is risky) but there's definitely a whole lot of misinformation out there that it would be better to ignore. To the extent such denial expands to a more general denial of underlying problems, this idea of intentional denial is probably just bad. But I sure wish that in a world where people (including myself) routinely deny significant widespread dangers like COVID-19's long-term risks or the ongoing harms of escalating fascism, they'd at least also deny some of the propaganda keeping them unhappy and passive. Instead of being in denial about US-run concentration camps, why not be in denial that the state will be able to punish you for resisting them?

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-06-21 02:34:13

Why AI can't possibly make you more productive; long
#AI and "productivity", some thoughts:
Edit: fixed some typos.
Productivity is a concept that isn't entirely meaningless outside the context of capitalism, but it's a concept that is heavily inflected in a capitalist context. In many uses today it effectively means "how much you can satisfy and/or exceed your boss' expectations." This is not really what it should mean: even in an anarchist utopia, people would care about things like how many shirts they can produce in a week, although in an "I'd like to voluntarily help more people" way rather than an "I need to meet this quota to earn my survival" way. But let's roll with this definition for a second, because it's almost certainly what your boss means when they say "productivity", and understanding that word in a different (even if truer) sense is therefore inherently dangerous.
Accepting "productivity" to mean "satisfying your boss' expectations," I will now claim: the use of generative AI cannot increase your productivity.
Before I dive in, it's imperative to note that the big generative models which most people think of as constituting "AI" today are evil. They are 1: pouring fuel on our burning planet, 2: psychologically strip-mining a class of data laborers who are exploited for their precarity, 3: enclosing, exploiting, and polluting the digital commons, and 4: stealing labor from broad classes of people many of whom are otherwise glad to give that labor away for free provided they get a simple acknowledgement in return. Any of these four "ethical issues" should be enough *alone* to cause everyone to simply not use the technology. These ethical issues are the reason that I do not use generative AI right now, except for in extremely extenuating circumstances. These issues are also convincing for a wide range of people I talk to, from experts to those with no computer science background. So before I launch into a critique of the effectiveness of generative AI, I want to emphasize that such a critique should be entirely unnecessary.
But back to my thesis: generative AI cannot increase your productivity, where "productivity" has been defined as "how much you can satisfy and/or exceed your boss' expectations."
Why? In fact, what the fuck? Every AI booster I've met has claimed the opposite. They've given me personal examples of time saved by using generative AI. Some of them even truly believe this. Sometimes I even believe they saved time without horribly compromising on quality (and often, your boss doesn't care about quality anyways if the lack of quality is hard to measure of doesn't seem likely to impact short-term sales/feedback/revenue). So if generative AI genuinely lets you write more emails in a shorter period of time, or close more tickets, or something else along these lines, how can I say it isn't increasing your ability to meet your boss' expectations?
The problem is simple: your boss' expectations are not a fixed target. Never have been. In virtue of being someone who oversees and pays wages to others under capitalism, your boss' game has always been: pay you less than the worth of your labor, so that they can accumulate profit and thus more capital to remain in charge instead of being forced into working for a wage themselves. Sure, there are layers of management caught in between who aren't fully in this mode, but they are irrelevant to this analysis. It matters not how much you please your manager if your CEO thinks your work is not worth the wages you are being paid. And using AI actively lowers the value of your work relative to your wages.
Why do I say that? It's actually true in several ways. The most obvious: using generative AI lowers the quality of your work, because the work it produces is shot through with errors, and when your job is reduced to proofreading slop, you are bound to tire a bit, relax your diligence, and let some mistakes through. More than you would have if you are actually doing and taking pride in the work. Examples are innumerable and frequent, from journalists to lawyers to programmers, and we laugh at them "haha how stupid to not check whether the books the AI reviewed for you actually existed!" but on a deeper level if we're honest we know we'd eventually make the same mistake ourselves (bonus game: spot the swipe-typing typos I missed in this post; I'm sure there will be some).
But using generative AI also lowers the value of your work in another much more frightening way: in this era of hype, it demonstrates to your boss that you could be replaced by AI. The more you use it, and no matter how much you can see that your human skills are really necessary to correct its mistakes, the more it appears to your boss that they should hire the AI instead of you. Or perhaps retain 10% of the people in roles like yours to manage the AI doing the other 90% of the work. Paradoxically, the *more* you get done in terms of raw output using generative AI, the more it looks to your boss as if there's an opportunity to get enough work done with even fewer expensive humans. Of course, the decision to fire you and lean more heavily into AI isn't really a good one for long-term profits and success, but the modern boss did not get where they are by considering long-term profits. By using AI, you are merely demonstrating your redundancy, and the more you get done with it, the more redundant you seem.
In fact, there's even a third dimension to this: by using generative AI, you're also providing its purveyors with invaluable training data that allows them to make it better at replacing you. It's generally quite shitty right now, but the more use it gets by competent & clever people, the better it can become at the tasks those specific people use it for. Using the currently-popular algorithm family, there are limits to this; I'm not saying it will eventually transcend the mediocrity it's entwined with. But it can absolutely go from underwhelmingly mediocre to almost-reasonably mediocre with the right training data, and data from prompting sessions is both rarer and more useful than the base datasets it's built on.
For all of these reasons, using generative AI in your job is a mistake that will likely lead to your future unemployment. To reiterate, you should already not be using it because it is evil and causes specific and inexcusable harms, but in case like so many you just don't care about those harms, I've just explained to you why for entirely selfish reasons you should not use it.
If you're in a position where your boss is forcing you to use it, my condolences. I suggest leaning into its failures instead of trying to get the most out of it, and as much as possible, showing your boss very clearly how it wastes your time and makes things slower. Also, point out the dangers of legal liability for its mistakes, and make sure your boss is aware of the degree to which any of your AI-eager coworkers are producing low-quality work that harms organizational goals.
Also, if you've read this far and aren't yet of an anarchist mindset, I encourage you to think about the implications of firing 75% of (at least the white-collar) workforce in order to make more profit while fueling the climate crisis and in most cases also propping up dictatorial figureheads in government. When *either* the AI bubble bursts *or* if the techbros get to live out the beginnings of their worker-replacement fantasies, there are going to be an unimaginable number of economically desperate people living in increasingly expensive times. I'm the kind of optimist who thinks that the resulting social crucible, though perhaps through terrible violence, will lead to deep social changes that effectively unseat from power the ultra-rich that continue to drag us all down this destructive path, and I think its worth some thinking now about what you might want the succeeding stable social configuration to look like so you can advocate towards that during points of malleability.
As others have said more eloquently, generative AI *should* be a technology that makes human lives on average easier, and it would be were it developed & controlled by humanists. The only reason that it's not, is that it's developed and controlled by terrible greedy people who use their unfairly hoarded wealth to immiserate the rest of us in order to maintain their dominance. In the long run, for our very survival, we need to depose them, and I look forward to what the term "generative AI" will mean after that finally happens.

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-08-15 03:27:16

US ethnic cleansing and what to do about it
Reposting link to source article instead of screenshot of tweet that had no alt text:
Data on arrests shows that ICE was heavily engaged in racial profiling in LA, because their arrest numbers fell by ~66% after that were ordered to stop making arrests based just in factors like skin color, with place, or language spoken.
#ICE #USPol

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-08-11 13:30:26

Speculative politics
As an anarchist (okay, maybe not in practice), I'm tired of hearing why we have to suffer X and Y indignity to "preserve the rule of law" or "maintain Democratic norms." So here's an example of what representative democracy (a form of government that I believe is inherently flawed) could look like if its proponents had even an ounce of imagination, and/or weren't actively trying to rig it to favor a rich donor class:
1. Unicameral legislature, where representatives pass laws directly. Each state elects 3 statewide representatives: the three most-popular candidates in a statewide race where each person votes for one candidate (ranked preference voting would be even better but might not be necessary, and is not a solution by itself). Instead of each representative getting one vote in the chamber, they get N votes, where N is the number of people who voted for them. This means that in a close race, instead of the winner getting all the power, the power is split. Having 3 representatives trades off between leisure size and ensuring that two parties can't dominate together.
2. Any individual citizen can contact their local election office to switch or withdraw their vote at any time (maybe with a 3-day delay or something). Voting power of representatives can thus shift even without an election. They are limited to choosing one of the three elected representatives, or "none of the above." If the "none of the above" fraction exceeds 20% of eligible voters, a new election is triggered for that state. If turnout is less than 80%, a second election happens immediately, with results being final even at lower turnout until 6 months later (some better mechanism for turnout management might be needed).
3. All elections allow mail-in ballots, and in-person voting happens Sunday-Tuesday with the Monday being a mandatory holiday. (Yes, election integrity is not better in this system and that's a big weakness.)
4. Separate nationwide elections elect three positions for head-of-state: one with diplomatic/administrative powers, another with military powers, and a third with veto power. For each position, the top three candidates serve together, with only the first-place winner having actual power until vote switches or withdrawals change who that is. Once one of these heads loses their first-place status, they cannot get it again until another election, even if voters switch preferences back (to avoid dithering). An election for one of these positions is triggered when 20% have withdrawn their votes, or if all three people initially elected have been disqualified by losing their lead in the vote count.
5. Laws that involve spending money are packaged with specific taxes to pay for them, and may only be paid for by those specific revenues. Each tax may be opted into or out of by each taxpayer; where possible opting out of the tax also opts you out of the service. (I'm well aware of a lot of the drawbacks of this, but also feel like they'd not necessarily be worse than the drawbacks of our current system.) A small mandatory tax would cover election expenses.
6. I'm running out of attention, but similar multi-winner elections could elect panels of judges from which a subset is chosen randomly to preside in each case.
Now I'll point out once again that this system, in not directly confronting capitalism, racism, patriarchy, etc., is probably doomed to the same failures as our current system. But if you profess to want a "representative democracy" as opposed to something more libratory, I hope you'll at least advocate for something like this that actually includes meaningful representation as opposed to the current US system that's engineered to quash it.
Key questions: "Why should we have winner-take-all elections when winners-take-proportionately-to-votes is right there?" and "Why should elected officials get to ignore their constituents' approval except during elections, when vote-withdrawal or -switching is possible?"
2/2
#Democracy

@tiotasram@kolektiva.social
2025-08-11 13:26:07

How the US democracy is designed to avoid representation
Right now in the US, a system which proclaims to give each citizen representation, my interests are not represented very well by most of my so-called representatives at any level of government. This is true for a majority of Americans across the political spectrum, and it happens by design. The "founding fathers" were explicit about wanting a system of government that would appear Democratic but which would keep power in the hands of rich white landowners, and they successfully designed exactly that. But how does disenfranchisement work in this system?
First, a two-party system locked in by first-post-the-post winner-takes-all elections immediately destroys representation for everyone who didn't vote for the winner, including those who didn't vote or weren't eligible to vote. Single-day non-holiday elections and prisoner disenfranchisement go a long way towards ensuring working-class people get no say, but much larger is the winner-takes all system. In fact, even people who vote for the winning candidate don't get effective representation if they're really just voting against the opponent as the greater of two evils. In a 51/49 election with 50% turnout, you've immediately ensured that ~75% of eligible voters don't get represented, and with lesser-of-two-evils voting, you create an even wider gap to wedge corporate interests into. Politicians need money to saturate their lesser-of-two-evils message far more than they need to convince any individual voter to support their policies. It's even okay if they get caught lying, cheating, or worse (cough Epstein cough) as long as the other side is also doing those things and you can freeze out new parties.
Second, by design the Senate ensures uneven representation, allowing control of the least-populous half of states to control or at least shut down the legislative process. A rough count suggests 284.6 million live in the 25 most-populous states, while only 54.8 million live in the rest. Currently, counting states with divided representation as two half-states with half as much population, 157.8 million people are represented by 53 Republican sensors, while 180.5 million people get only 45 seats of Democratic representation. This isn't an anti-Democrat bias, it's a bias towards less-populous states, whose residents get more than their share it political power.
I haven't even talked about gerrymandering yet, or family/faith-based "party loyalty," etc. Overall, the effect is that the number of people whose elected representatives meaningfully represent their interests on any given issue is vanishingly small (like, 10% of people tops), unless you happen to be rich enough to purchase lobbying power or direct access.
If we look at polls, we can see how lack of representation lets congress & the president enact many policies that go against what a majority of the population wants. Things like abortion restrictions, the current ICE raids, and Medicare cuts are deeply unpopular, but they benefit the political class and those who can buy access. These are possible because the system ensures at every step of the way that ordinary people do NOT get the one thing the system promises them: representation in the halls of power.
Okay, but is this a feature of all democracies, inherent in the nature of a majority-decides system? Not exactly...
1/2
#uspol #democracy